Deliberate

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6521
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1192 times
Been thanked: 445 times

Deliberate

Post: # 1242281Post Jacks Back »

Hi folks, Not sure if this belongs here or has been brought up but here goes.

In last nights deliberate against Thornton of Carlton, shouldn't the deliberate behind have counted?

I ask this as the behind was not registered for the rest of the night on the TV scoreboard at least. Only one behind was registered when the bulldogs bloke hit the post (another drama because the goal umpire thought it was a goal :roll: - why don't they just have two goal umpires at each end)?

Does anyone know what the go is here?


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Deliberate

Post: # 1242285Post plugger66 »

The behind does not count.


User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8962
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 59 times
Been thanked: 342 times

Re: Deliberate

Post: # 1242288Post perfectionist »

Jacks Back wrote:Hi folks, Not sure if this belongs here or has been brought up but here goes.

In last nights deliberate against Thornton of Carlton, shouldn't the deliberate behind have counted?

I ask this as the behind was not registered for the rest of the night on the TV scoreboard at least. Only one behind was registered when the bulldogs bloke hit the post (another drama because the goal umpire thought it was a goal :roll: - why don't they just have two goal umpires at each end)?

Does anyone know what the go is here?
Some good issues raised. First, it was deliberate, despite the antics of the supporters, one whom jumped the fence and should spend time in the hoosegow (but will probably just get a fine). Second, although under current rules it doesn't count, it would be worth considering whether it should (probably not). Third, the issue of where the kick is taken from should be examined (should be the same spot, top of the square, no matter where the ball crosses the line). And finally, yes of course there should be four goal umpires - it's a no brainer, as we have seen it work in preseason comps and there has not (to my knowledge) been one incorrect decision regarding the ball hitting the post. We know that there was one incorrect decision in the 2009 GF. What we don't know is whether the final result would have been changed. It didn't help our chances.
Last edited by perfectionist on Sun 22 Jul 2012 1:07pm, edited 1 time in total.


Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6521
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1192 times
Been thanked: 445 times

Re: Deliberate

Post: # 1242290Post Jacks Back »

plugger66 wrote:The behind does not count.
But isn't it a "deliberate behind"? Therefore a behind that was deliberately given to the opposition team? Why then shouldn't THAT count?

On four goal umpires (two at each end) - they can get behind each goal post (with the boundary umpires behind the point posts). If its a touch and go situation then one is behind the goal post while the other looks for touched on the line. Fair dinkum, its not rocket science.

Of course you could just take the hitting the post rule away and pay it a goal or point (or on the full) depending which side of the post the ball goes through or play on when the ball bounces back into play. That would be the easiest solution.


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6521
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1192 times
Been thanked: 445 times

Re: Deliberate

Post: # 1242291Post Jacks Back »

On where the kick should be taken it should be from where the ball was hand balled through last night or a set spot 25 metres out or put a spot on the ground where the full forward should stand for a kick in after a behind.


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6521
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1192 times
Been thanked: 445 times

Re: Deliberate

Post: # 1242297Post Jacks Back »

plugger66 wrote:The behind does not count.
Hi plugger. I just had a look at the rules of the game and I can't find where it says that the behind DOES NOT count.

15.7 free kIcks — deLIBerate rushed BehINd
15.7.1 when awarded
A Free Kick shall be awarded against a Player from the defending Team
who intentionally Kicks, Handballs or forces the football over the attacking
Team’s Goal Line or Behind Line or onto one of the attacking Team’s Goal
Posts. In assessing whether a Free Kick should be awarded under this
Law, the field Umpire shall give the benefit of the doubt to the Defender.
15.7.2 taking free kick
A Free Kick awarded under Law 15.7.1 shall be taken at the point where
the football crossed the Goal Line or Behind Line or from the relevant
Goal Post.


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Deliberate

Post: # 1242298Post plugger66 »

Jacks Back wrote:
plugger66 wrote:The behind does not count.
Hi plugger. I just had a look at the rules of the game and I can't find where it says that the behind DOES NOT count.

15.7 free kIcks — deLIBerate rushed BehINd
15.7.1 when awarded
A Free Kick shall be awarded against a Player from the defending Team
who intentionally Kicks, Handballs or forces the football over the attacking
Team’s Goal Line or Behind Line or onto one of the attacking Team’s Goal
Posts. In assessing whether a Free Kick should be awarded under this
Law, the field Umpire shall give the benefit of the doubt to the Defender.
15.7.2 taking free kick
A Free Kick awarded under Law 15.7.1 shall be taken at the point where
the football crossed the Goal Line or Behind Line or from the relevant
Goal Post.

A behind cant be registered without the all clear. As no all clear is given no behind is given to the side. The free is paid before the all clear so takes precedence.


Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6521
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1192 times
Been thanked: 445 times

Re: Deliberate

Post: # 1242304Post Jacks Back »

ok thanks plugger - Go saints


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
St DAC
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2119
Joined: Tue 28 Sep 2004 7:43pm
Location: Gippsland
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Deliberate

Post: # 1242305Post St DAC »

IANAL, but a I believe a deliberate behind is an infringement, and a free kick is awarded with no score recorded. Same result if a free is paid in a marking contest where the ball ends up through the points, but a free is awarded against a player in that contest. No score recorded ...


Post Reply