Interesting stat on SEN

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
mickey
Club Player
Posts: 124
Joined: Fri 15 Mar 2013 8:58am
Been thanked: 68 times

Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011627Post mickey »

Daniel Hoyne from Champion data :-

In the past 4 weeks the Saints were top 4 in defence and are now 13th. From memory Wilkie went from 4th to the 20's, Battle moved from about 23rd to 29th but Howard went from 13th to the 80's. When asked if that was due to less team defence the guy said no, he was continually losing one on one contests.

The other was Gresham's performance in the midfield, he went from one of the top ranked to last. We need more from this guy.

I still think we're a good side but there's a few that continually go missing when the heat is on. I don't mind losing when the whole team has left everything out on the field but I'm not sure some can look their team mates in the eye.


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22847
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 714 times
Been thanked: 1696 times

Re: Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011628Post Teflon »

Thanks for sharing that
Fox said similar re our defence slide but did t know individual numbers so that’s interesting
I think it’s the inconsistency within players….maybe we just overrate them on a few good games ???
Need to get some more youth in imo


“Yeah….nah””
B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11145
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2447 times

Re: Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011633Post B.M »

Someone may have mentioned Gresham was disappointed

Lyon does not know how to use him imo

Needs to take a look at Longmire’s use of Papley


Annoyedsaint
Club Player
Posts: 520
Joined: Sun 27 May 2018 9:49pm
Has thanked: 109 times
Been thanked: 126 times

Re: Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011648Post Annoyedsaint »

Howard losing one on ones….
Well tickle me pink.

He’s a dud and a half.


Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6518
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1186 times
Been thanked: 444 times

Re: Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011649Post Jacks Back »

Wilkie hasn't been the same since Steele came back in and relieved him of the captaincy.

Hard for Howard to defend when the FF gets bullet passes to the chest.


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6072
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 336 times
Been thanked: 1557 times

Re: Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011666Post CQ SAINT »

Midfield pressure dropped away too has it?


User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7775
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 203 times
Been thanked: 550 times

Re: Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011674Post magnifisaint »

Jacks Back wrote: Wed 31 May 2023 7:34am Wilkie hasn't been the same since Steele came back in and relieved him of the captaincy.

Hard for Howard to defend when the FF gets bullet passes to the chest.
What bullet passes. He continually loses his footing and is turned inside out. He looks like he plays with his shoelaces tied. He's crap.


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
Beno88
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2254
Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007 11:14am
Location: Bentleigh East
Has thanked: 265 times
Been thanked: 547 times

Re: Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011676Post Beno88 »

The clear difference in our performances from Rounds 1-8 to Rounds 9-11 is all in the middle.

Our inability to win the ball cleanly from centre bounces and stoppages, combined with our lack of immediate spread is making it very easy for our opposition to control the play.

Rounds 1-8 we were moderate for clearances, sitting +0.4 per game, ranked 8th in the competition.
Rounds 9-11 we are poor, sitting -5.0 per game, ranked 16th in the competition.

Further to that, our ability to score from clearances and stoppages has been nullified.

Rounds 1-8 we were 8th for scores for, and 16th for scores against from clearances.
Round 9-11 we are ranked 13th for scores for, and 3rd for scores against.

Almost all of our key mids are down on their clearance output from the first 8 weeks – Steele (-31%), Ross (-23%), Crouch (-4%), Marshall (-2%), Clark (-17%), Byrnes (-38%), Wood (-50%), Hill (-29%).
Only Gresham (+67%) , Phillipou (+33%), Sinclair (+22%) & Owens (+5%) have shown improvement.

Once the opposition win the ball, we allow them to spread and retain possession too easily.

Round 1-8 we were good for uncontested possessions, sitting at +3.7 per game, ranked 7th.
Rounds 9-11 we are poor for uncontested possessions, sitting at -43.4 per game, ranked 18th.

We did allow the opposition to maintain possession earlier in the season, but mainly in our back half. Now it’s happening everywhere.

Since Round 9, the number of uncontested possessions conceded in our defensive half has more than doubled.

To summarize, the last three matches have seen our ability to take clean ball from stoppages completely diminish, but it seems we’re still set up to lock the ball in, thus when it’s cleared by our opposition, we’re unable to defend or even create a contest.


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11145
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2447 times

Re: Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011678Post B.M »

Is it a coincidence that these numbers have happened since Nick Walsh quit?


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22562
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8519 times
Been thanked: 3751 times

Re: Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011682Post saynta »

B.M wrote: Wed 31 May 2023 1:58pm Is it a coincidence that these numbers have happened since Nick Walsh quit?
Interesting comment and worthy of further discussion.


Laurie
Club Player
Posts: 521
Joined: Tue 21 Feb 2012 1:59pm
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 108 times

Re: Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011692Post Laurie »

Totally agree with you B.M re Nick Walsh has anyone been appointed to replace him.
Who is the guy who is currently in his role?


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18533
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1525 times
Been thanked: 1875 times

Re: Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011703Post SaintPav »

Beno88 wrote: Wed 31 May 2023 1:21pm The clear difference in our performances from Rounds 1-8 to Rounds 9-11 is all in the middle.

Our inability to win the ball cleanly from centre bounces and stoppages, combined with our lack of immediate spread is making it very easy for our opposition to control the play.

Rounds 1-8 we were moderate for clearances, sitting +0.4 per game, ranked 8th in the competition.
Rounds 9-11 we are poor, sitting -5.0 per game, ranked 16th in the competition.

Further to that, our ability to score from clearances and stoppages has been nullified.

Rounds 1-8 we were 8th for scores for, and 16th for scores against from clearances.
Round 9-11 we are ranked 13th for scores for, and 3rd for scores against.

Almost all of our key mids are down on their clearance output from the first 8 weeks – Steele (-31%), Ross (-23%), Crouch (-4%), Marshall (-2%), Clark (-17%), Byrnes (-38%), Wood (-50%), Hill (-29%).
Only Gresham (+67%) , Phillipou (+33%), Sinclair (+22%) & Owens (+5%) have shown improvement.

Once the opposition win the ball, we allow them to spread and retain possession too easily.

Round 1-8 we were good for uncontested possessions, sitting at +3.7 per game, ranked 7th.
Rounds 9-11 we are poor for uncontested possessions, sitting at -43.4 per game, ranked 18th.

We did allow the opposition to maintain possession earlier in the season, but mainly in our back half. Now it’s happening everywhere.

Since Round 9, the number of uncontested possessions conceded in our defensive half has more than doubled.

To summarize, the last three matches have seen our ability to take clean ball from stoppages completely diminish, but it seems we’re still set up to lock the ball in, thus when it’s cleared by our opposition, we’re unable to defend or even create a contest.
Great analysis.

Any idea what’s happened to scoring from turnover?


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11145
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2447 times

Re: Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011704Post B.M »

Requires pressure - it’s dropped away significantly


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18533
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1525 times
Been thanked: 1875 times

Re: Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011714Post SaintPav »

True


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6072
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 336 times
Been thanked: 1557 times

Re: Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011721Post CQ SAINT »

B.M wrote: Wed 31 May 2023 1:58pm Is it a coincidence that these numbers have happened since Nick Walsh quit?
No.


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11145
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2447 times

Re: Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011723Post B.M »

Why not?


User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5788 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011730Post Ghost Like »

I wish Gresham was half as good & half as invested as Papley is with his ability & intensity.


CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6072
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 336 times
Been thanked: 1557 times

Re: Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011731Post CQ SAINT »

B.M wrote: Wed 31 May 2023 9:04pmWhy not?
Because, there was a change of strategy. That's a change. Not a coincidence.


CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6072
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 336 times
Been thanked: 1557 times

Re: Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011733Post CQ SAINT »

Jones, Billings, Bytel, Mackenzie, Coffield and others, have struggled to stay on the field for years. That never changed under Walsh.
It looks like Mason Wood has been doing his own program and a number of the new recruits have been mentored by him and are developing quickly.
Walsh got everyone who could stay fit, really fit but he didn't inherit the list. The injuries have been pretty bad to players we couldn't afford to start this year injured.


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11145
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2447 times

Re: Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011736Post B.M »

Injuries happen - ballistic contact sport


Zed
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2170
Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:59pm
Location: by the seaside..
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 180 times

Re: Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011744Post Zed »

saynta wrote: Wed 31 May 2023 2:13pm
B.M wrote: Wed 31 May 2023 1:58pm Is it a coincidence that these numbers have happened since Nick Walsh quit?
Interesting comment and worthy of further discussion.
Same observation made in our household .
Hawks had no issue running over the top of us - we look to have lost our fitness edge and that ability to grind away at teams late in the game.


Life is never more fun than when you're the underdog competing against the giants.
User avatar
SydneySainter
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2356
Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
Has thanked: 52 times
Been thanked: 142 times

Re: Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011766Post SydneySainter »

Annoyedsaint wrote: Wed 31 May 2023 3:33am Howard losing one on ones….
Well tickle me pink.

He’s a dud and a half.
Howard is not definitely not an AFL level fullback. Atm, he’s barely an AFL level defender - period.

Problem being, who is there to replace him? We’re stuck with him until we get a quality tall.


Until we have an administration that demands success and a playing group that bleeds for the guernsey, St. Kilda will just be a sh*tty football club.
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22847
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 714 times
Been thanked: 1696 times

Re: Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011768Post Teflon »

Zed wrote: Wed 31 May 2023 10:05pm
saynta wrote: Wed 31 May 2023 2:13pm
B.M wrote: Wed 31 May 2023 1:58pm Is it a coincidence that these numbers have happened since Nick Walsh quit?
Interesting comment and worthy of further discussion.
Same observation made in our household .
Hawks had no issue running over the top of us - we look to have lost our fitness edge and that ability to grind away at teams late in the game.
Our fitness edge was never going to be sustainable- sone sides start pre season slower (cats do it every year , Dogs notorious fir not prioritising running)
The difference is our senior midfield leaders have badly dropped away - stats tell you that we couldn’t win a clearance against Hawks
That’s not cause we weren’t fitter - that’s down to the ability of the individual to deliver when the heat goes up
Ours can’t
They did exactly the same thing last year - Nick Walsh was there then??????
Sometimes if it looks like a duck..


“Yeah….nah””
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22847
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 714 times
Been thanked: 1696 times

Re: Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011769Post Teflon »

Beno88 wrote: Wed 31 May 2023 1:21pm The clear difference in our performances from Rounds 1-8 to Rounds 9-11 is all in the middle.

Our inability to win the ball cleanly from centre bounces and stoppages, combined with our lack of immediate spread is making it very easy for our opposition to control the play.

Rounds 1-8 we were moderate for clearances, sitting +0.4 per game, ranked 8th in the competition.
Rounds 9-11 we are poor, sitting -5.0 per game, ranked 16th in the competition.

Further to that, our ability to score from clearances and stoppages has been nullified.

Rounds 1-8 we were 8th for scores for, and 16th for scores against from clearances.
Round 9-11 we are ranked 13th for scores for, and 3rd for scores against.

Almost all of our key mids are down on their clearance output from the first 8 weeks – Steele (-31%), Ross (-23%), Crouch (-4%), Marshall (-2%), Clark (-17%), Byrnes (-38%), Wood (-50%), Hill (-29%).
Only Gresham (+67%) , Phillipou (+33%), Sinclair (+22%) & Owens (+5%) have shown improvement.

Once the opposition win the ball, we allow them to spread and retain possession too easily.

Round 1-8 we were good for uncontested possessions, sitting at +3.7 per game, ranked 7th.
Rounds 9-11 we are poor for uncontested possessions, sitting at -43.4 per game, ranked 18th.

We did allow the opposition to maintain possession earlier in the season, but mainly in our back half. Now it’s happening everywhere.

Since Round 9, the number of uncontested possessions conceded in our defensive half has more than doubled.

To summarize, the last three matches have seen our ability to take clean ball from stoppages completely diminish, but it seems we’re still set up to lock the ball in, thus when it’s cleared by our opposition, we’re unable to defend or even create a contest.
Seriously good post 👍


“Yeah….nah””
B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11145
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2447 times

Re: Interesting stat on SEN

Post: # 2011770Post B.M »

Another misnomer in footy

Fitness staff control injuries

The fittest guys sometimes get injured, the most unfit sometimes don’t.
When you train any muscle group to it extremes- injury may happen.

Fitness staff prepare athletes for games.

Rehab guys manage injuries


Post Reply