Crouch outcome

[terry smith rules]

I think it will be graded

Careless
Low impact (did not leave ground to be assessed)
High

According to AFL matrix that is a fine

[wally]

St.Kilda ……..means he will get weeks

[skeptic]

No way he doesn’t get weeks

Certainly will get one as Gardiner kept playing

I think one is a good outcome

Knowing the AFL, he cops 2

[Wayne42]

Does the club know a good QC to use during the Tribunal process ?

Could they afford one ?

[Templar]

Gives Bytel a go.

[SaintPav]

2 weeks according to Daisy and father of the year looking to make amends.

It has already been decided.

[terry smith rules]

2 weeks according to Daisy and father of the year looking to make amends.

It has already been decided.

Please refer to the AFL matrix

To be two weeks it needs to be either

Intentional, high and medium impact

Or

Careless, high and high impact

Did Gardiner even leave the ground, the impact must be graded as low

[SaintPav]

2 weeks according to Daisy and father of the year looking to make amends.

It has already been decided.

Please refer to the AFL matrix

To be two weeks it needs to be either

Intentional, high and medium impact

Or

Careless, high and high impact

Did Gardiner even leave the ground, the impact must be graded as low

Indeed.

That’s not how Daisy saw it last night.

[perfectionist]

1 match

Crouch has been offered a one-match ban, with the Match Review Officer deeming the incident careless, high contact and medium impact.

[Banger9798]

1 match

Crouch has been offered a one-match ban, with the Match Review Officer deeming the incident careless, high contact and medium impact.

About right, good year from Crouch, gives Bytel a chance in that role

[terry smith rules]

1 match

Crouch has been offered a one-match ban, with the Match Review Officer deeming the incident careless, high contact and medium impact.

Absolutely disgraceful, how can it possibly be medium impact

Gardiner did not even have a concussion test, played 95% of the game

Club must appeal as it just shows the club, screw you , you are only St Kilda

[therabbitinthehat]

Absolutely disgraceful, how can it possibly be medium impact

Gardiner did not even have a concussion test, played 95% of the game

Club must appeal as it just shows the club, screw you , you are only St Kilda

While I agree, it's not worth the time and money for the appeal

[Sainter_Dad]

Absolutely disgraceful, how can it possibly be medium impact

Gardiner did not even have a concussion test, played 95% of the game

Club must appeal as it just shows the club, screw you , you are only St Kilda

While I agree, it's not worth the time and money for the appeal

Yes it f@rking is - I don't care about the outcome of this appeal - but I care about us becoming RELEVANT - and someone needs to challenge the Cripps decision - and the AFL can't AFFORD to.

[therabbitinthehat]

Yes it f@rking is - I don't care about the outcome of this appeal - but I care about us becoming RELEVANT - and someone needs to challenge the Cripps decision - and the AFL can't AFFORD to.

Based on our past experience with appeals he'd end up with the same result with it costing us thousands. We either need better lawyers or a war chest for the bribes

[meher baba]

I can’t imagine that too many SS posters would be happy with a fine if it had been Gardiner who has made the hit on Crouch.

Sure, the appeal decision re Cripps was outrageous, but that’s a separate matter. And trying to use that as a precedent will simply piss off the AFL for a minimal practical benefit, given that we don’t desperately need to beat the Swans for any particular reason.