http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx
“That’s not right. From my understanding he’s OK. He may have gone off but he hasn’t reported that he’s been injured,â€
Hutchison denies Stanley injury
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
iwantmeseats
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3303
- Joined: Tue 23 May 2006 6:14pm
- Location: East Oakleigh
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 40 times
-
Mr X from the West
- Club Player
- Posts: 1239
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 5:58pm
- Location: Subiaco
-
saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30060
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 706 times
- Been thanked: 1219 times
-
Unforgiven
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3258
- Joined: Wed 23 Feb 2005 9:48pm
- Location: Full Forward
Good news if true regarding Stanley. I think the players in contention to replace Kosi are Cahill, Stanley, Gardiner and maybe Lynch.
Gardiner and King to ruck, Benny Mac to FF.
Or a straight swap with Stanley, Cahill or Lynch to FF, and Gardiner/Benny, King/Benny to ruck.
While we are playing North this week, I think the selection choice should be stuck with and seen through the next 3 rounds. No point playing Stanley/Cahill for a game only to be dropped for collingwood.
Gardiner and King to ruck, Benny Mac to FF.
Or a straight swap with Stanley, Cahill or Lynch to FF, and Gardiner/Benny, King/Benny to ruck.
While we are playing North this week, I think the selection choice should be stuck with and seen through the next 3 rounds. No point playing Stanley/Cahill for a game only to be dropped for collingwood.
Carpe Diem
or nick heyneUnforgiven wrote:Good news if true regarding Stanley. I think the players in contention to replace Kosi are Cahill, Stanley, Gardiner and maybe Lynch.
Gardiner and King to ruck, Benny Mac to FF.
Or a straight swap with Stanley, Cahill or Lynch to FF, and Gardiner/Benny, King/Benny to ruck.
While we are playing North this week, I think the selection choice should be stuck with and seen through the next 3 rounds. No point playing Stanley/Cahill for a game only to be dropped for collingwood.
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
-
Unforgiven
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3258
- Joined: Wed 23 Feb 2005 9:48pm
- Location: Full Forward
for a key position though? Heyne strikes me as a flanker in both heigh, build and playing style.
Stanley and Cahill are legitimate Key poisition players, and while I reckon Lynch is more a lead up 3rd tall, at 192 he also a key position player potentailly or has some size about him.
I think with the current forward set up, Riewoldt, Mini, Milne, Schneider etc, a bit more height and size is the way to go.
Stanley and Cahill are legitimate Key poisition players, and while I reckon Lynch is more a lead up 3rd tall, at 192 he also a key position player potentailly or has some size about him.
I think with the current forward set up, Riewoldt, Mini, Milne, Schneider etc, a bit more height and size is the way to go.
Carpe Diem
-
ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10700
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 29 times
- Been thanked: 804 times
Gardiner may replace McEvoy or King but whoever they pick at full forward it should be a 3 game solution not a one gamer.Unforgiven wrote:Good news if true regarding Stanley. I think the players in contention to replace Kosi are Cahill, Stanley, Gardiner and maybe Lynch.
Gardiner and King to ruck, Benny Mac to FF.
Or a straight swap with Stanley, Cahill or Lynch to FF, and Gardiner/Benny, King/Benny to ruck.
While we are playing North this week, I think the selection choice should be stuck with and seen through the next 3 rounds. No point playing Stanley/Cahill for a game only to be dropped for collingwood.
That means a genuine forward, not a ruckman or other makeshift filling in.
Cahill or Lynch would seem to be the more likely.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
-
groupie1
- Club Player
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 4:21am
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
Lynch used the ball nicely couple times in NAB cup. Looks like he could be a full forward, if necessary. bit like a Tony Modra.Unforgiven wrote:for a key position though? Heyne strikes me as a flanker in both heigh, build and playing style.
Stanley and Cahill are legitimate Key poisition players, and while I reckon Lynch is more a lead up 3rd tall, at 192 he also a key position player potentailly or has some size about him.
I think with the current forward set up, Riewoldt, Mini, Milne, Schneider etc, a bit more height and size is the way to go.
Gordon Fode couldda been Plugga