Heat/Interchange restrictions created an unsafe workplace!

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Heat/Interchange restrictions created an unsafe workplace!

Post: # 529280Post saintspremiers »

FACTS: Adelaide was stinking hot last night, much hotter than you'd reasonably expect even for early March, but it can happen - it was only early Autumn.

Interchange restrictions of 16 rotations per quarter is a bit nasty in very hot weather!

The AFL knew the whole pre-season was prone to the odd stinking hot day, and their only compromise was extending the quarter/3 qtr and half time breaks.

I still have my doubts if this was sufficient to prevent heat related stress on the players bodies, we all know the Saints went into the air con rooms at each break and delayed the start of the final term due to heat related stress fears and precautions by our conditioning staff (good work!).

I believe the AFL created an unsafe work environment last night.

Sure, they couldn't really call the game off due to the heat, but why not either delay the start, increase the bench size, allow more than 16 rotations, or shorten the quarters???

I don't believe extending the breaks was sufficient.

I hope some players from Adelaide suffered due to heat (not our guys of course!), and they try and take the AFL on with their bloody stupid rules.


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Heat/Interchange restrictions created an unsafe workplac

Post: # 529413Post plugger66 »

saintspremiers wrote:FACTS: Adelaide was stinking hot last night, much hotter than you'd reasonably expect even for early March, but it can happen - it was only early Autumn.

Interchange restrictions of 16 rotations per quarter is a bit nasty in very hot weather!

The AFL knew the whole pre-season was prone to the odd stinking hot day, and their only compromise was extending the quarter/3 qtr and half time breaks.

I still have my doubts if this was sufficient to prevent heat related stress on the players bodies, we all know the Saints went into the air con rooms at each break and delayed the start of the final term due to heat related stress fears and precautions by our conditioning staff (good work!).

I believe the AFL created an unsafe work environment last night.

Sure, they couldn't really call the game off due to the heat, but why not either delay the start, increase the bench size, allow more than 16 rotations, or shorten the quarters???

I don't believe extending the breaks was sufficient.

I hope some players from Adelaide suffered due to heat (not our guys of course!), and they try and take the AFL on with their bloody stupid rules.
I agree lets sue the AFL and get them to go bankrupt then we can get back to the AFL. Sue them I say.


User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12701
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 717 times
Been thanked: 401 times

Re: Heat/Interchange restrictions created an unsafe workplac

Post: # 529415Post Mr Magic »

plugger66 wrote:
saintspremiers wrote:FACTS: Adelaide was stinking hot last night, much hotter than you'd reasonably expect even for early March, but it can happen - it was only early Autumn.

Interchange restrictions of 16 rotations per quarter is a bit nasty in very hot weather!

The AFL knew the whole pre-season was prone to the odd stinking hot day, and their only compromise was extending the quarter/3 qtr and half time breaks.

I still have my doubts if this was sufficient to prevent heat related stress on the players bodies, we all know the Saints went into the air con rooms at each break and delayed the start of the final term due to heat related stress fears and precautions by our conditioning staff (good work!).

I believe the AFL created an unsafe work environment last night.

Sure, they couldn't really call the game off due to the heat, but why not either delay the start, increase the bench size, allow more than 16 rotations, or shorten the quarters???

I don't believe extending the breaks was sufficient.

I hope some players from Adelaide suffered due to heat (not our guys of course!), and they try and take the AFL on with their bloody stupid rules.
I agree lets sue the AFL and get them to go bankrupt then we can get back to the AFL. Sue them I say.
I'm staggered it took you nearly 4 hours to respond to this.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Heat/Interchange restrictions created an unsafe workplac

Post: # 529417Post plugger66 »

Mr Magic wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
saintspremiers wrote:FACTS: Adelaide was stinking hot last night, much hotter than you'd reasonably expect even for early March, but it can happen - it was only early Autumn.

Interchange restrictions of 16 rotations per quarter is a bit nasty in very hot weather!

The AFL knew the whole pre-season was prone to the odd stinking hot day, and their only compromise was extending the quarter/3 qtr and half time breaks.

I still have my doubts if this was sufficient to prevent heat related stress on the players bodies, we all know the Saints went into the air con rooms at each break and delayed the start of the final term due to heat related stress fears and precautions by our conditioning staff (good work!).

I believe the AFL created an unsafe work environment last night.

Sure, they couldn't really call the game off due to the heat, but why not either delay the start, increase the bench size, allow more than 16 rotations, or shorten the quarters???

I don't believe extending the breaks was sufficient.

I hope some players from Adelaide suffered due to heat (not our guys of course!), and they try and take the AFL on with their bloody stupid rules.
I agree lets sue the AFL and get them to go bankrupt then we can get back to the AFL. Sue them I say.
I'm staggered it took you nearly 4 hours to respond to this.
Been at the silly family day. So do agree with him or not.


User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12701
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 717 times
Been thanked: 401 times

Re: Heat/Interchange restrictions created an unsafe workplac

Post: # 529418Post Mr Magic »

plugger66 wrote:
Mr Magic wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
saintspremiers wrote:FACTS: Adelaide was stinking hot last night, much hotter than you'd reasonably expect even for early March, but it can happen - it was only early Autumn.

Interchange restrictions of 16 rotations per quarter is a bit nasty in very hot weather!

The AFL knew the whole pre-season was prone to the odd stinking hot day, and their only compromise was extending the quarter/3 qtr and half time breaks.

I still have my doubts if this was sufficient to prevent heat related stress on the players bodies, we all know the Saints went into the air con rooms at each break and delayed the start of the final term due to heat related stress fears and precautions by our conditioning staff (good work!).

I believe the AFL created an unsafe work environment last night.

Sure, they couldn't really call the game off due to the heat, but why not either delay the start, increase the bench size, allow more than 16 rotations, or shorten the quarters???

I don't believe extending the breaks was sufficient.

I hope some players from Adelaide suffered due to heat (not our guys of course!), and they try and take the AFL on with their bloody stupid rules.
I agree lets sue the AFL and get them to go bankrupt then we can get back to the AFL. Sue them I say.
I'm staggered it took you nearly 4 hours to respond to this.
Been at the silly family day. So do agree with him or not.
I'm not qualified medically to determine whether the players were put at risk by the AFL im,posed conditions.

My instinct tells me that the maximum 16 interchanges per quarter should have been 'relaxed' given the circumstances.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 529422Post plugger66 »

Was talking about taking the AFL on which I gather means sueing.

By the way I think the interchange rule is stupid but I guess the AFL need to try it because the rules committee have been thinking about the amount of interchanges according to KB


User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12701
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 717 times
Been thanked: 401 times

Post: # 529427Post Mr Magic »

plugger66 wrote:Was talking about taking the AFL on which I gather means sueing.

By the way I think the interchange rule is stupid but I guess the AFL need to try it because the rules committee have been thinking about the amount of interchanges according to KB
I agree but would have thought that 'commonsense' should have been used rather than 'bloody mindedness' which is what appears to have been the case over the # of interchanges.


User avatar
Solar
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8144
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 12:43pm

Post: # 529430Post Solar »

I was suprised they started the game so early in that type of heat


FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust

2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10683
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 801 times

Post: # 529718Post ace »

I say sue Demetriou and Anderson instead of the AFL.
They are paid so much most of the AFLs discretionary cash must end up in their pockets.


Post Reply