Do’h
I don’t get it. What could you hope to get from Paton late in the game other than for him to come on and possibly blanket a staring Hawk mid.
I’d have had him top 22 or nothing
Team vs Hawks
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16564
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3454 times
- Been thanked: 2716 times
Re: Team vs Hawks
I don’t get it. What could you hope to get from Paton late in the game other than for him to come on and possibly blanket a staring Hawk mid.
I’d have had him top 22 or nothing
-
meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7067
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 461 times
Re: Team vs Hawks
Spot on.
The only sense I can make of it is that perhaps the club doesn't feel that Paton is quite ready to run out a full game.
Oh well, Breust for the Hawks doesn't make too much sense either. Don't running mids, wingmen or halfbacks make the best subs?
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
- Jonathan Swift
-
spert
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8936
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 398 times
Re: Team vs Hawks
Sub out Henry or Wood or Membrey or Ross, or Hayes and put Paton in the middle and Sincs in the forward half.