Ben Longs report

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22562
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8520 times
Been thanked: 3751 times

Re: Ben Longs report

Post: # 1976991Post saynta »

The_Dud wrote: Tue 23 Aug 2022 10:03am So how many weeks did he end up getting?
Clearly the f****** short sighted Muppet should not have reported Ben in the first place.

Never was a case to answer,


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9480
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 131 times
Been thanked: 1206 times

Re: Ben Longs report

Post: # 1976992Post CURLY »

saynta wrote: Tue 23 Aug 2022 11:00am
The_Dud wrote: Tue 23 Aug 2022 10:03am So how many weeks did he end up getting?
Clearly the f****** short sighted Muppet should not have reported Ben in the first place.

Never was a case to answer,
Thats the point. Bang reports him when it clearly was not reportable.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
remboy
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2128
Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
Location: Rockville
Has thanked: 545 times
Been thanked: 175 times

Re: Ben Longs report

Post: # 1977000Post remboy »

D.B.Cooper wrote: Tue 23 Aug 2022 6:44am
remboy wrote: Mon 22 Aug 2022 11:21pm Been cleared not case to answer. Move on.
Where did you hear that?

Say it isn’t so!
This does not sit at all well with the conspiracy narrative that the Saints player will be suspended.
Maybe they are assuming he will be at another club next year and don’t want to penalise them. You know it makes sense.


Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13243
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1286 times
Been thanked: 1974 times

Re: Ben Longs report

Post: # 1977004Post The_Dud »

CURLY wrote: Tue 23 Aug 2022 11:03am
saynta wrote: Tue 23 Aug 2022 11:00am
The_Dud wrote: Tue 23 Aug 2022 10:03am So how many weeks did he end up getting?
Clearly the f****** short sighted Muppet should not have reported Ben in the first place.

Never was a case to answer,
Thats the point. Bang reports him when it clearly was not reportable.
So basically you've been crying for days over the umpire saying the word 'reported' a couple of times... :shock:

No 50m penalty was paid... the game is reviewed afterwards for incidents anyway... on-field reports are basically irrelevant... it was thrown out as expected...

Storm in a tea-cup (if that?)

But nothing can stop Cryin' Curly!


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13243
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1286 times
Been thanked: 1974 times

Re: Ben Longs report

Post: # 1977005Post The_Dud »

remboy wrote: Tue 23 Aug 2022 11:44am
D.B.Cooper wrote: Tue 23 Aug 2022 6:44am
remboy wrote: Mon 22 Aug 2022 11:21pm Been cleared not case to answer. Move on.
Where did you hear that?

Say it isn’t so!
This does not sit at all well with the conspiracy narrative that the Saints player will be suspended.
Maybe they are assuming he will be at another club next year and don’t want to penalise them. You know it makes sense.
Image


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9480
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 131 times
Been thanked: 1206 times

Re: Ben Longs report

Post: # 1977009Post CURLY »

The_Dud wrote: Tue 23 Aug 2022 12:29pm
CURLY wrote: Tue 23 Aug 2022 11:03am
saynta wrote: Tue 23 Aug 2022 11:00am
The_Dud wrote: Tue 23 Aug 2022 10:03am So how many weeks did he end up getting?
Clearly the f****** short sighted Muppet should not have reported Ben in the first place.

Never was a case to answer,
Thats the point. Bang reports him when it clearly was not reportable.
So basically you've been crying for days over the umpire saying the word 'reported' a couple of times... :shock:

No 50m penalty was paid... the game is reviewed afterwards for incidents anyway... on-field reports are basically irrelevant... it was thrown out as expected...

Storm in a tea-cup (if that?)

But nothing can stop Cryin' Curly!

Umpire reported a player for a nothing incident based on who it was. Remember Ziebel belting McKenzie earlier in the season and not a thing no fifty no free no report.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Freebird
Club Player
Posts: 919
Joined: Sun 29 Jan 2012 12:37pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: Ben Longs report

Post: # 1977023Post Freebird »

Unfortunately Dud is an umpires man (indicated by his nic)..freely criticizes our players but never the umpires


Post Reply