Tom Lee
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
SydneySainter
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2356
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 142 times
Re: Tom Lee
Don't think he's been that bad, just don't put him in the ruck.
Last edited by SydneySainter on Sat 02 Jul 2016 4:31pm, edited 1 time in total.
Until we have an administration that demands success and a playing group that bleeds for the guernsey, St. Kilda will just be a sh*tty football club.
-
saintbob
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed 21 May 2008 8:51pm
- Location: Tassie
- Has thanked: 447 times
- Been thanked: 288 times
Re: Tom Lee
saintbob wrote:Wayne42 wrote:Lee doesn't appear to be good enough at this level.
An absolute spud and whoever said he was an elite kick is full of s***!!!
-
evertonfc
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7261
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 9:11pm
- Location: 'Quietly Confident' County
- Has thanked: 115 times
- Been thanked: 267 times
- Contact:
Re: Tom Lee
Happy to give him a few games before the end of the season but at this rate I cannot see him on the list next season.
Clueless and mediocre petty tyrant.
-
saintspremiers
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Tom Lee
Agreeevertonfc wrote:Happy to give him a few games before the end of the season but at this rate I cannot see him on the list next season.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Re: Tom Lee
I think his tank is a big issue - its looking like its not AFL standard. He's also not good off the deck. Having both him and Delaney in the backline makes us pretty stodgy - Delaney had 0 kicks which shows you how much he feels confident kicking.
-
Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
-
saintspremiers
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Re: Tom Lee
True. Shame as I'd prefer him at Sandy. Very handy VFL playerCon Gorozidis wrote:Gone. Will be in the WAFL season.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Re: Tom Lee
Could be... from what I saw was toweled up and not up to it.saintspremiers wrote:Seems injured again. Just not up to it it seems.
defence where lazy and asleep today, bloody horrid the lot of em JG was best out of the bunch for me
Re: Tom Lee
Fish, not necessarily Demps. We are already too flat at the back. We need more half back creators, not more shut down players like Demps. I want to see White come in and show what he can do. Rice and Mckenzie are the others that can fire shots from the back. Games like that shows up how we can't work the ball out of the back cleanly.felix wrote:A lot of posters wanted fish and Dempster gone ...would have been handy today.
-
whiskers3614
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4494
- Joined: Thu 20 May 2010 11:49pm
- Has thanked: 118 times
- Been thanked: 297 times
-
cwrcyn
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4176
- Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
- Location: earth
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1358 times
Re: Tom Lee
Doesn't have the body that will hold up to the physicality of AFL football. Being undersized for key position (strength-wise), his future seems pretty clear. Feel sorry for him. He's been injured for most of his time with us. Wasn't his fault we gave up a first round pick for him.
-
To the top
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
Re: Tom Lee
The ultimate question with Lee is not if he is a KPP defender but if, with Carlisle and Goddard long term (and Fisher and Dempster both retired and I would not be forcing either out), can he play that 3rd "tall" defender role because, whilst we still have Fisher that role is not a problem because Fisher is one of the all time best in that role, but there is no obvious alternate candidate on our List currently other than Lee (ie Delaney and others mentioned, who are all mid-size defenders do not provide that option).
-
Impatient Sainter
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4089
- Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
- Has thanked: 2622 times
- Been thanked: 1077 times
Re: Tom Lee
Looked like he was playing injured - trying to save his career. Roberton & Gilbert were no better.
Re: Tom Lee
Second chance on an afl list, and people still call him a kid...he isn't
Both relevant points
Not many get that opportunity, and he somehow got a 2 year deal...
Both relevant points
Not many get that opportunity, and he somehow got a 2 year deal...
-
saintkid
- Club Player
- Posts: 1740
- Joined: Tue 16 Sep 2008 12:30am
- Has thanked: 140 times
- Been thanked: 296 times
Re: Tom Lee
Lee is a nice bloke who has tried hard and it's not his fault that our recruiters at the time were either blinded or under the influence of something to swap such a high draft pick for him. A very poor choice. There were never any quality highlights of him remotely justifying his worth.
-
CURLY
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9480
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 131 times
- Been thanked: 1206 times
-
saynta
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 22562
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8520 times
- Been thanked: 3751 times
Re: Tom Lee
Wayne42 wrote:Lee doesn't appear to be good enough at this level.
I have been saying that for a number of years.
He is a liability. Like playing a man short.
After today's piss poor effort,surely his papers have been stamped
-
saynta
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 22562
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8520 times
- Been thanked: 3751 times
Re: Tom Lee
felix wrote:A lot of posters wanted fish and Dempster gone ...would have been handy today.
I think todays poor effort has just about guaranted both an extra year