Why not Dangerfield?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
lewdogs
Club Player
Posts: 641
Joined: Tue 17 Jun 2008 2:11pm
Has thanked: 107 times
Been thanked: 179 times

Re: Why not Dangerfield?

Post: # 1558500Post lewdogs »

Completely agree with this sentiment. If we are realistic about targeting free agency we have to go all out for Danger. Fits the age bracket and is the best out there, it's a no -brainer really.

I was wondering if perhaps pur comments about Sloane from the likes of Richo earlier in the year may have been a bit of smoke and mirrors to hide our interest in Danger?


citywest

Re: Why not Dangerfield?

Post: # 1559070Post citywest »

Stay away from FA until the end of 2017. By then they will all want to come to us so we will be able to cherry pick who we want. And more importantly, at a better price :idea: :idea: :idea: :idea: :!: :!: :!: :!:


Saintberra
Club Player
Posts: 99
Joined: Fri 23 May 2014 11:32pm

Re: Why not Dangerfield?

Post: # 1559071Post Saintberra »

lewdogs wrote:I was wondering if perhaps pur comments about Sloane from the likes of Richo earlier in the year may have been a bit of smoke and mirrors to hide our interest in Danger?
Might have been to increase Sloane's market value, meaning that they would have had to pay Sloane more than they otherwise would - leaving less in the bank for Danger :wink:


stjay
Club Player
Posts: 397
Joined: Tue 12 May 2015 2:50pm

Re: Why not Dangerfield?

Post: # 1559116Post stjay »

If it is not zero then it very close to zero chance of him coming to the Saints. It's Adelaide (Crows) or Moggs Creek(Cats) - his manager has stated as much.


User avatar
St Chris
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2153
Joined: Wed 05 Apr 2006 2:20pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 41 times

Re: Why not Dangerfield?

Post: # 1581171Post St Chris »

The Age is reporting the possibility of Dangerfield nominating for the draft....

So in the spirit of off season hypotheticals, we haven't traded out Pick 5, Dangerfield has nominated in the draft and put a $3.6M over 4 years price on his head, and picks 1 through 4 have taken kids, do you pick him at 5??

For me, I pick him. Moggs Creek isn't that far from Seaford ( if you take the Sorrento Ferry :D ), and he would be the face of the club for the next 5 years, allowing Nick to take a step back and concentrate on footy and his family for his last couple of seasons.


Sobraz
SS Life Member
Posts: 3399
Joined: Thu 29 Mar 2007 1:06pm
Has thanked: 2 times

Re: Why not Dangerfield?

Post: # 1581176Post Sobraz »

St Chris wrote:The Age is reporting the possibility of Dangerfield nominating for the draft....

So in the spirit of off season hypotheticals, we haven't traded out Pick 5, Dangerfield has nominated in the draft and put a $3.6M over 4 years price on his head, and picks 1 through 4 have taken kids, do you pick him at 5??

For me, I pick him. Moggs Creek isn't that far from Seaford ( if you take the Sorrento Ferry :D ), and he would be the face of the club for the next 5 years, allowing Nick to take a step back and concentrate on footy and his family for his last couple of seasons.
Would we need him if the bloke in your avatar eventuates??

Without question, pick 5 on Danger would be a great result, irrespective of how fanciful.


Post Reply