Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
Your a stranger person cairnsman. If i said I think there are problems with some of the players and the coach, you would be first to say where is the proof so i say I heard it first hand and im a big noter. You are the only one that says big noter, I certainly dont think its big noting but coming from a small noter like you, meeting Rooy's brothers best friend would be a thrill for you.
And again I dont see where I mentioned senior players.
Anyone that backs themselves by referencing inside knowledge is not only a bignoter but also doesn't have any credible ground to stand on unless anonymous posters can prove the veracity of their posts. To me I think it is a wasted post to say "I think this", or "I argue this" and "believe me", or "I don't care if you don't believe me" because I have inside knowledge and it's the truth. It's exactly what Jaxons does and we all know what his agenda is and yours is the same but you're just are little more subtle and "white ant" than he is. It's embarrassing but hey Barry you keep on talking to those players about what is really going on.
Rubbish but at least its consistant rubbish. Not once have I said SW should be sacked so I have no idea what you think my agenda is. And by the way if you hear something how should you go about saying it on here? Why isnt Tony 74 talking crap then? because it suits what you think. At least make it a bit less obvious. It seems the only thing we should ever discuss on here is opinion or fact that we have seen in the media because anything else in your opinion is lies to suit an agenda unless of course it suits your agenda. Very weird. hey did you know I lived with a test cricketer?
Anyone that backs themselves by referencing inside knowledge is not only a bignoter but also doesn't have any credible ground to stand on unless anonymous posters can prove the veracity of their posts. To me I think it is a wasted post to say "I think this", or "I argue this" and "believe me", or "I don't care if you don't believe me" because I have inside knowledge and it's the truth. It's exactly what Jaxons does and we all know what his agenda is and yours is the same but you're just are little more subtle and "white ant" than he is. It's embarrassing but hey Barry you keep on talking to those players about what is really going on.
Rubbish but at least its consistant rubbish. Not once have I said SW should be sacked so I have no idea what you think my agenda is. And by the way if you hear something how should you go about saying it on here? Why isnt Tony 74 talking crap then? because it suits what you think. At least make it a bit less obvious. It seems the only thing we should ever discuss on here is opinion or fact that we have seen in the media because anything else in your opinion is lies to suit an agenda unless of course it suits your agenda. Very weird. hey did you know I lived with a test cricketer?
I've never accused you of saying he should be sacked, not once, Jaxons has, but as I say he's a lot more forthright in his belief on that topic than you are. You just have little nibble here and there and then throw in the odd post that says you know stuff we don't know. Don't know what your agenda is but I do know that you are not a fan of SWs. BTW I don't care if you are gay, good on you for landing a catch, no pun intended, I bet all of your girlfriends are jealous.
Anyone that backs themselves by referencing inside knowledge is not only a bignoter but also doesn't have any credible ground to stand on unless anonymous posters can prove the veracity of their posts. To me I think it is a wasted post to say "I think this", or "I argue this" and "believe me", or "I don't care if you don't believe me" because I have inside knowledge and it's the truth. It's exactly what Jaxons does and we all know what his agenda is and yours is the same but you're just are little more subtle and "white ant" than he is. It's embarrassing but hey Barry you keep on talking to those players about what is really going on.
Rubbish but at least its consistant rubbish. Not once have I said SW should be sacked so I have no idea what you think my agenda is. And by the way if you hear something how should you go about saying it on here? Why isnt Tony 74 talking crap then? because it suits what you think. At least make it a bit less obvious. It seems the only thing we should ever discuss on here is opinion or fact that we have seen in the media because anything else in your opinion is lies to suit an agenda unless of course it suits your agenda. Very weird. hey did you know I lived with a test cricketer?
I've never accused you of saying he should be sacked, not once, Jaxons has, but as I say he's a lot more forthright in his belief on that topic than you are. You just have little nibble here and there and then throw in the odd post that says you know stuff we don't know. Don't know what your agenda is but I do know that you are not a fan of SWs. BTW I don't care if you are gay, good on you for landing a catch, no pun intended, I bet all of your girlfriends are jealous.
You didnt read again. Lived. And im not a huge fan of SW yet. lets see what happens next season. There are plenty of people here who arent huge fans of half our list of players. Whats the difference if you arent a huge fan of the coach? One thing i am strong on though is he must coach next year and about midway through the year if he meets the criteria that the set then he should be signed up for a further 2 years. If he doesnt at the half way mark then he has another 11 games to meet the criteria. if he doesnt then we look for a new coach. he isnt sacked that way, just not re signed.
Cairnsman wrote:
Rubbish but at least its consistant rubbish. Not once have I said SW should be sacked so I have no idea what you think my agenda is. And by the way if you hear something how should you go about saying it on here? Why isnt Tony 74 talking crap then? because it suits what you think. At least make it a bit less obvious. It seems the only thing we should ever discuss on here is opinion or fact that we have seen in the media because anything else in your opinion is lies to suit an agenda unless of course it suits your agenda. Very weird. hey did you know I lived with a test cricketer?
I've never accused you of saying he should be sacked, not once, Jaxons has, but as I say he's a lot more forthright in his belief on that topic than you are. You just have little nibble here and there and then throw in the odd post that says you know stuff we don't know. Don't know what your agenda is but I do know that you are not a fan of SWs. BTW I don't care if you are gay, good on you for landing a catch, no pun intended, I bet all of your girlfriends are jealous.
You didnt read again. Lived. And im not a huge fan of SW yet. lets see what happens next season. There are plenty of people here who arent huge fans of half our list of players. Whats the difference if you arent a huge fan of the coach? One thing i am strong on though is he must coach next year and about midway through the year if he meets the criteria that the set then he should be signed up for a further 2 years. If he doesnt at the half way mark then he has another 11 games to meet the criteria. if he doesnt then we look for a new coach. he isnt sacked that way, just not re signed.
Ok sorry so does that mean you have switched back to being a hetro or did you replace the test cricketer with another man, anyway I digress, it would seem that we are almost on the same page with regards to how the club should treat SW. Even if he doesn't stack up to the clubs measure they shouldn't sack him before his contract is up. Makes no sense at all to do that based on where the list is at and also where the finances are at. One other thing I'd like a club to do in our position is publicise what it is he will be judged on, the Chairman has already stated that the win/loss is not the main indicator for next season so why not get on the front foot and let the public know what is require of him next year and hopefully take all of the oxygen out of any media blood hunt. Then hopefully it provides not only the coach but the club and players the ability to focus on the job at hand and not be distracted by insane hounding from the media.
Caro has just written that SW has received at least 2 warnings from the club in the last few weeks. Next step The Pelican will be made to give him the cuts. 6 of the best.
He's a very naughty boy.
_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
8856brother wrote:Caro has just written that SW has received at least 2 warnings from the club in the last few weeks. Next step The Pelican will be made to give him the cuts. 6 of the best.
He's a very naughty boy.
'Twas interesting that Caro reported the "warnings" were for job "parameters".
Given she doesn't mention "performance" as the reason, I wonder what would have happened if she'd used "clarifications" and "as a result of the review".
Maybe Watters needs to trot out "not my job" more often. A lot of people use it as a 1st resort.
'I have no new illusions, and I have no old illusions' - Vladimir Putin, Geneva, June 2021
SW went through exhaustive scrutiny by a very well regarded panel. I wonder what's gone wrong in such a short time? Understandably, people operate/react differently in real life situations, but what does that say about our choice of SW in the first place? Extend that thought to the eventual next coach !
White Winmar wrote:Now there's one thing I do know. He made an unauthorised appearance in the electronic media.
Which the pres said made no difference, because the board meeting started at 8 a.m. and they made the decision in there, on the basis of what they took in there.
'I have no new illusions, and I have no old illusions' - Vladimir Putin, Geneva, June 2021
White Winmar wrote:Now there's one thing I do know. He made an unauthorised appearance in the electronic media.
Which the pres said made no difference, because the board meeting started at 8 a.m. and they made the decision in there, on the basis of what they took in there.
... and what they heard in there with the tranny in the middle of the boardroom table.
Ned Stark wrote:That press conference left me with zero confidence in the management of this football club.
You have that much?
A fter what they have doe to us as supporters, I have less than zero
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
Ive been looking for actual footy related examples and fine ally (pun intended) i heard one.
Finey mentioned the ahmed saad selection v brisbane.
Saad was dropped to sandy
Had a positive asada test
Had 7 touches at sandy
Got injured and was put on injury list
Then for some weird power ego reason watters insisted on playing him .
Despite selection committee medicos and ceo not wanting him to play.
Of course he came off injured at half time without touching the ball.
I do remember it was bizarre. Many on here commented at the time.
Saad barely touched the ball all year and scott insisted in picking him and refused/ignored curren until the end.
Im sure there will be other examples of footy related weirdness.
