Recycled Players
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Recycled Players
OK i would love everyones opinion of our recruiting of recycled payers taken under RL. We have had most of them for a while now and i am going to count players we have delisted and then relisted or players we have re rookied
Pass
Ray
Schnieder
Dawson
M. Gardner
King (gets a pass on our desperate need for a ruckmen when he got there)
Fail
C. Gardner
McQualter
Eddy
Geary
Peake (probably the most border line of these)
Undeicided but not looking good
Gamble
Polo
Have no idea why we pciked these 2. You can say we got them cheap but i know 18 year olds that play VFL this year that would have been a better pick. Young kid at casey by the name of Mitch Gent who i think prob would have made it as a quickish well skilled midfielder but not given a chance
Pass
Ray
Schnieder
Dawson
M. Gardner
King (gets a pass on our desperate need for a ruckmen when he got there)
Fail
C. Gardner
McQualter
Eddy
Geary
Peake (probably the most border line of these)
Undeicided but not looking good
Gamble
Polo
Have no idea why we pciked these 2. You can say we got them cheap but i know 18 year olds that play VFL this year that would have been a better pick. Young kid at casey by the name of Mitch Gent who i think prob would have made it as a quickish well skilled midfielder but not given a chance
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: Recycled Players
McQualter & Eddy are technically recycled - from ourselves.NoMore wrote:OK i would love everyones opinion of our recruiting of recycled payers taken under RL. We have had most of them for a while now and i am going to count players we have delisted and then relisted or players we have re rookied
Pass
Ray
Schnieder
Dawson
M. Gardner
King (gets a pass on our desperate need for a ruckmen when he got there)
Fail
C. Gardner
McQualter
Eddy
Geary
Peake (probably the most border line of these)
Undeicided but not looking good
Gamble
Polo
Have no idea why we pciked these 2. You can say we got them cheap but i know 18 year olds that play VFL this year that would have been a better pick. Young kid at casey by the name of Mitch Gent who i think prob would have made it as a quickish well skilled midfielder but not given a chance
But why is Geary on the list? He was picked up in the Rookie Draft and later elevated to the Senior List where he remains
I agree with u on ray
i can't remember what he cost us but has now been with us for a while and am starting to wonder if we had used what cost us to take a decent young pplayer would we be in better shape now
i know these are hypotheticals but my opinion is u trade for guns but u look after the club by going to the draft
i can't remember what he cost us but has now been with us for a while and am starting to wonder if we had used what cost us to take a decent young pplayer would we be in better shape now
i know these are hypotheticals but my opinion is u trade for guns but u look after the club by going to the draft
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
- Spinner
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8502
- Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
- Location: Victoria
- Has thanked: 185 times
- Been thanked: 133 times
Thats the thing... That pick 32 for Ray would be having an impact today... Pity picks 13 (Lynch) 48 (Heyne) and 49 (Who we got in the Ray trade ' Stanley) havnt made an impact at all.NoMore wrote:I agree with u on ray
i can't remember what he cost us but has now been with us for a while and am starting to wonder if we had used what cost us to take a decent young pplayer would we be in better shape now
i know these are hypotheticals but my opinion is u trade for guns but u look after the club by going to the draft
Its like the Lovett trade pick 16.. (Pittard) Did he play his first game on the weekend?
Lets get something straight - 95% of all the picks (especially picks like '30' for Luke Ball would be having next to nothing impact right now.
It cheeses me off flippant responses like this.......
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5429
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 460 times
- Contact:
I think you've missed some...
Dempster (came with Schneider)
Jess Smith
Fraser Gehrig
Colm Begley
Brad Howard
Andrew Lovett
And on the Farren Ray trade...we also got Nick Heyne with the Bulldog's pick...so you should also include him in your analysis.
On Gamble & Polo...There were no other new players picked by any club after Gamble and Polo...All other clubs used these picks late in the draft to promote their rookies whilst other clubs (Gold Coast, Richmond and Fremantle) had already passed. What does that tell you about the quality of the players left?
Most clubs by that stage of the draft would rather place a young kid on the rookie list as it is seriously doubtful they will make it. While they're being developed you don't have to pay them much until they actually play. It's a smart move, really.
Dempster (came with Schneider)
Jess Smith
Fraser Gehrig
Colm Begley
Brad Howard
Andrew Lovett
And on the Farren Ray trade...we also got Nick Heyne with the Bulldog's pick...so you should also include him in your analysis.
On Gamble & Polo...There were no other new players picked by any club after Gamble and Polo...All other clubs used these picks late in the draft to promote their rookies whilst other clubs (Gold Coast, Richmond and Fremantle) had already passed. What does that tell you about the quality of the players left?
Most clubs by that stage of the draft would rather place a young kid on the rookie list as it is seriously doubtful they will make it. While they're being developed you don't have to pay them much until they actually play. It's a smart move, really.
]Life Long Saint wrote:I think you've missed some...
Dempster (came with Schneider)
Jess Smith
Fraser Gehrig
Colm Begley
Brad Howard
Andrew Lovett
And on the Farren Ray trade...we also got Nick Heyne with the Bulldog's pick...so you should also include him in your analysis.
On Gamble & Polo...There were no other new players picked by any club after Gamble and Polo...All other clubs used these picks late in the draft to promote their rookies whilst other clubs (Gold Coast, Richmond and Fremantle) had already passed. What does that tell you about the quality of the players left?
Most clubs by that stage of the draft would rather place a young kid on the rookie list as it is seriously doubtful they will make it. While they're being developed you don't have to pay them much until they actually play. It's a smart move, really.
We need to win the flag this year or next. A young kid isnt going to do that. We took the punt 4 years a go to draft more senior players because the window was open at that time. In retrospect maybe we should not have but you could also argued it was one point off working. Once we took that punt there was no turning back.
Make no mistake once our window closes we will fall very quickly but after one flag in 114 years the punt was probably worth it.
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5429
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 460 times
- Contact:
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
OK, cheers...we don't want to start up the inevitible arguement again. But, I've got nothing but support for furnishing our team with retreads...as p66 pointed out, they're more likely to produce instant results than a project.Life Long Saint wrote:The OP placed the qualifier of "taken under Ross Lyon"...so Milne and Gram don't qualify...Nor would have Hamill, Voss, Black, Fiora, Brooks...the list goes on.degruch wrote:Milne. I reckon he's a pass. Gram, not bad either.Life Long Saint wrote:I think you've missed some...
It's a shame kids like Attard, Allen, Tungarumbelumbelum, etc. didn't come on, as they may have made us less reliant on recruiting action-ready players.
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30060
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 706 times
- Been thanked: 1219 times
From memory with Ray we actually got a young player as well as we swapped a pick for Ray plus a later. = Heyne).NoMore wrote:I agree with u on ray
i can't remember what he cost us but has now been with us for a while and am starting to wonder if we had used what cost us to take a decent young pplayer would we be in better shape now
i know these are hypotheticals but my opinion is u trade for guns but u look after the club by going to the draft
That pick may have also aloowed them to speculate on Stanley as Stanley was taken with Heyne in consecutive picks.
So that trade would seem good value to me.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30060
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 706 times
- Been thanked: 1219 times
Howard was a straight pick..nota retread. Pick 27 from memory.Life Long Saint wrote:I think you've missed some...
Dempster (came with Schneider)
Jess Smith
Fraser Gehrig
Colm Begley
Brad Howard
Andrew Lovett
.
Last edited by saintsRrising on Mon 28 Mar 2011 2:31pm, edited 2 times in total.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30060
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 706 times
- Been thanked: 1219 times
Overall our retreads, if you want to call them at have by and large returned good, if not very good value, relative to the cost.
The big waste was the first round pick for Lovett....which holds the trusim to not trade your first round pick.
What has been the problem IMO is not thhe retreads...but rather that our picks of the kids have not been as good as they could have been (apologies to this years crop which looks to be pretty fair value relative to where taken.
One could make a good case that he we had not gone down the recycled player path as much as we have that we would be in even worse shape.
It also should be remembered that the recycled path put us within a bee's-dick of two Grand Final wins ina row.
The big waste was the first round pick for Lovett....which holds the trusim to not trade your first round pick.
What has been the problem IMO is not thhe retreads...but rather that our picks of the kids have not been as good as they could have been (apologies to this years crop which looks to be pretty fair value relative to where taken.
One could make a good case that he we had not gone down the recycled player path as much as we have that we would be in even worse shape.
It also should be remembered that the recycled path put us within a bee's-dick of two Grand Final wins ina row.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
NoMore wrote:I agree with u on ray
i can't remember what he cost us but has now been with us for a while and am starting to wonder if we had used what cost us to take a decent young pplayer would we be in better shape now
We got Ray and pick 48 (used on Heyne) for a pick in the low 30s after which Ross said he wanted Heyne with that low 30s pck anyway which means Ray cost us absolutely zero.saintsRrising wrote: From memory with Ray we actually got a young player as well as we swapped a pick for Ray plus a later. = Heyne).
That pick may have also aloowed them to speculate on Stanley as Stanley was taken with Heyne in consecutive picks.
So that trade would seem good value to me.
"I'm a better coach when Nick Riewoldt is in the side" - Ross Lyon 2007
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
I actually think out of our list of retreads we have some beauties. Farren is a GOP to VGOP. that is better than the likely result of a guy taken in the mid 30s and he would still be finding their feet at Sandy.
There was an interesting Age article by Garry lyon about Sydney v Melbourne in recruiting. It kind of made the point that there are two ways to go and when one works everyone copies. Remember the real breakthrough the Pies made were in recruiting Jolly, Ball and L Brown. They looked a heap better straight off the bat not in the 4 years it would have taken to develop them. Might just be the model everyone copies if The GC doesn't hit it's straps in a couple of years.
The Pies now have Kraquer(can't spell it still) our f$#@ up in Lovett stopped us being able to have a go at him, so careful what you wish for.
There was an interesting Age article by Garry lyon about Sydney v Melbourne in recruiting. It kind of made the point that there are two ways to go and when one works everyone copies. Remember the real breakthrough the Pies made were in recruiting Jolly, Ball and L Brown. They looked a heap better straight off the bat not in the 4 years it would have taken to develop them. Might just be the model everyone copies if The GC doesn't hit it's straps in a couple of years.
The Pies now have Kraquer(can't spell it still) our f$#@ up in Lovett stopped us being able to have a go at him, so careful what you wish for.
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5429
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 460 times
- Contact:
ok so seem we need to do some tidying up
I was specifically looking at players taken under Ross Lyon
i would classify dempster as a fail
Gram and Gehrig were icked up under GT both are big passes
Smith = Fail
Lovett need i say more
Howard it would be totally unfair coz not sure when he was drafted but since R. Clarkes draft i would think McEnvoy would be the only play to recieve a pass mark.
So maybe this argument is not about recycled players but more about our recruiting under RL
I was specifically looking at players taken under Ross Lyon
i would classify dempster as a fail
Gram and Gehrig were icked up under GT both are big passes
Smith = Fail
Lovett need i say more
Howard it would be totally unfair coz not sure when he was drafted but since R. Clarkes draft i would think McEnvoy would be the only play to recieve a pass mark.
So maybe this argument is not about recycled players but more about our recruiting under RL
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5429
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 460 times
- Contact:
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga