Milne free to play

bigcarl · Post: # 1131881Post **bigcarl** » Mon 05 Sep 2011 3:32pm

I heard

saintbrat · Post: # 1131883Post **saintbrat** » Mon 05 Sep 2011 3:32pm

sense

bigcarl · Post: # 1131884Post **bigcarl** » Mon 05 Sep 2011 3:34pm

saintbrat wrote:sense

sorry, didn't see SainterK had posted it on another thread

SainterK wrote:Polo cleared, Milne offered reprimand for 5 year good record, Joseph fined $900 for standing on his hand.

saintbrat · Post: # 1131885Post **saintbrat** » Mon 05 Sep 2011 3:38pm

I hadn't read it anyway- didn't realise he was actually charged......???

good if Jacobs gets something too-

can we retrospectively charge the guy who stood on Bakes....... and cost him 4 weeks.

AnythingsPossibleSaints · Mon 05 Sep 2011 3:42pm

GT will be spewing!

plugger66 · Post: # 1131890Post **plugger66** » Mon 05 Sep 2011 3:43pm

AnythingsPossibleSaints wrote:GT will be spewing!

Why?

MCG-Unit · Post: # 1131891Post **MCG-Unit** » Mon 05 Sep 2011 3:45pm

bigcarl wrote:
saintbrat wrote:sense

sorry, didn't see SainterK had posted it on another thread

SainterK wrote:Polo cleared, Milne offered reprimand for 5 year good record, Joseph fined $900 for standing on his hand.

Doesn't matter, no need to be sorry - there are folks who post anything and everything, I had not seen the other one either

Sainterman · Mon 05 Sep 2011 3:48pm

Ok, so Milne retaliates and gets 125 points reduced but Joseph who steps on his hand (which had to have been viewed as deliberate to have copped a fine) gets no points?? How do they work that out???

Such a Mickey Mouse system. Fix it AFL, fix it!!

ThePunter · Post: # 1131896Post **ThePunter** » Mon 05 Sep 2011 3:48pm

Can take reprimand and 70.31 points due to good record and guilty plea.

Joseph fined $900 for standing on Milne.

AnythingsPossibleSaints · Mon 05 Sep 2011 3:50pm

plugger66 wrote:
AnythingsPossibleSaints wrote:GT will be spewing!
Why?

Mostly tongue in cheek, but also because he doesn't think he gets the job done in finals and even reckons he wanted to leave him out of the first final in 2005, the week after he kicked 11 against Brisbane.
I get the feeling if GT was still in charge and had all the say he may not want him to play this week, but hopefully that has eased over recent years.

saintDal · Post: # 1131903Post **saintDal** » Mon 05 Sep 2011 3:52pm

Interesting that Joseph got a fine instead of a suspension/reprimand. Anyone know why this is the case?

perfectionist · Mon 05 Sep 2011 3:56pm

Clearly Stephen was wrong to retaliate just because someone deliberately stepped on his hand. What he should have done was to place his other hand on the ground and ask Mr Joseph to step on it, just for balance. Every other AFL player would have taken this approach. Shame on you Stephen!

Sheesh!

saintbrat · Post: # 1131907Post **saintbrat** » Mon 05 Sep 2011 3:59pm

can S Baker make an ambit claim to the AFL MRP for the 4 weeks he recieved for retaliating when (named) played stood on his leg.....

maybe he could get back all the weeks he's lost but have casued rules to be changed.

plugger66 · Post: # 1131908Post **plugger66** » Mon 05 Sep 2011 4:00pm

saintbrat wrote:can S Baker make an ambit claim to the AFL MRP for the 4 weeks he recieved for retaliating when (named) played stood on his leg.....

maybe he could get back all the weeks he's lost but have casued rules to be changed.

Who did that?

kosifantutti23 · Mon 05 Sep 2011 4:07pm

This was not retaliation. Milne was reported for his cheap shot to the guts when Joseph wasn't looking. He received the appropriate points and yet people want to whinge and complain.

I'm pretty sure it was Riewoldt who stood on someone's hand last week. Where was his fine?

SainterK · Post: # 1131920Post **SainterK** » Mon 05 Sep 2011 4:07pm

Reprimand and 70.31 points, be careful Milney

plugger66 · Post: # 1131922Post **plugger66** » Mon 05 Sep 2011 4:07pm

kosifantutti23 wrote:This was not retaliation. Milne was reported for his cheap shot to the guts when Joseph wasn't looking. He received the appropriate points and yet people want to whinge and complain.

I'm pretty sure it was Riewoldt who stood on someone's hand last week. Where was his fine?

And BJ earlier in the year.

saintbrat · Post: # 1131926Post **saintbrat** » Mon 05 Sep 2011 4:11pm

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx

was some years ago plugger and Bakes definetly got weeks for retaliation.

Selhurst Saint · Mon 05 Sep 2011 4:11pm

plugger66 wrote:
saintbrat wrote:can S Baker make an ambit claim to the AFL MRP for the 4 weeks he recieved for retaliating when (named) played stood on his leg.....

maybe he could get back all the weeks he's lost but have casued rules to be changed.
Who did that?

Stephen Alessio, the miserable dog.

Sainterman · Mon 05 Sep 2011 4:13pm

plugger66 wrote:
kosifantutti23 wrote:This was not retaliation. Milne was reported for his cheap shot to the guts when Joseph wasn't looking. He received the appropriate points and yet people want to whinge and complain.

I'm pretty sure it was Riewoldt who stood on someone's hand last week. Where was his fine?
And BJ earlier in the year.

Were BJ or Roo charged with an offence?

The difference here is that Joseph was seen as intentional and the others were not.

Once it was seen as intentional I am wondering how it gets a fine and not points?

Able to explain?

plugger66 · Post: # 1131930Post **plugger66** » Mon 05 Sep 2011 4:15pm

Sainterman wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
kosifantutti23 wrote:This was not retaliation. Milne was reported for his cheap shot to the guts when Joseph wasn't looking. He received the appropriate points and yet people want to whinge and complain.

I'm pretty sure it was Riewoldt who stood on someone's hand last week. Where was his fine?
And BJ earlier in the year.
Were BJ or Roo charged with an offence?

The difference here is that Joseph was seen as intentional and the others were not.

Once it was seen as intentional I am wondering how it gets a fine and not points?

Able to explain?

Have no idea but it looked very similar to BJ's. Thought he would get off. Anyway couldnt give a stuff. All I care about is Milney plays Saturday night.

Sainterman · Mon 05 Sep 2011 4:17pm

plugger66 wrote:
Sainterman wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
kosifantutti23 wrote:This was not retaliation. Milne was reported for his cheap shot to the guts when Joseph wasn't looking. He received the appropriate points and yet people want to whinge and complain.

I'm pretty sure it was Riewoldt who stood on someone's hand last week. Where was his fine?
And BJ earlier in the year.
Were BJ or Roo charged with an offence?

The difference here is that Joseph was seen as intentional and the others were not.

Once it was seen as intentional I am wondering how it gets a fine and not points?

Able to explain?
Have no idea but it looked very similar to BJ's. Thought he would get off. Anyway couldnt give a stuff. All I care about is Milney plays Saturday night.

Why post if you couldn't give a stuff?

Also happy Milney is playing, shame he now has carry overs.

plugger66 · Post: # 1131933Post **plugger66** » Mon 05 Sep 2011 4:18pm

Sainterman wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Sainterman wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
kosifantutti23 wrote:This was not retaliation. Milne was reported for his cheap shot to the guts when Joseph wasn't looking. He received the appropriate points and yet people want to whinge and complain.

I'm pretty sure it was Riewoldt who stood on someone's hand last week. Where was his fine?
And BJ earlier in the year.
Were BJ or Roo charged with an offence?

The difference here is that Joseph was seen as intentional and the others were not.

Once it was seen as intentional I am wondering how it gets a fine and not points?

Able to explain?
Have no idea but it looked very similar to BJ's. Thought he would get off. Anyway couldnt give a stuff. All I care about is Milney plays Saturday night.
Why post if you couldn't give a stuff?

Also happy Milney is playing, shame he now has carry overs.

So if you ask a question I should ignore it. Strange.

Sainterman · Mon 05 Sep 2011 4:20pm

plugger66 wrote:
Sainterman wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
Sainterman wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
kosifantutti23 wrote:This was not retaliation. Milne was reported for his cheap shot to the guts when Joseph wasn't looking. He received the appropriate points and yet people want to whinge and complain.

I'm pretty sure it was Riewoldt who stood on someone's hand last week. Where was his fine?
And BJ earlier in the year.
Were BJ or Roo charged with an offence?

The difference here is that Joseph was seen as intentional and the others were not.

Once it was seen as intentional I am wondering how it gets a fine and not points?

Able to explain?
Have no idea but it looked very similar to BJ's. Thought he would get off. Anyway couldnt give a stuff. All I care about is Milney plays Saturday night.
Why post if you couldn't give a stuff?

Also happy Milney is playing, shame he now has carry overs.
So if you ask a question I should ignore it. Strange.

No, was honored that you responded to my question, more about why you'd post on the topic in the first place if you didn't give a stuff about Joseph and only cared about Milney.

saintspremiers · Mon 05 Sep 2011 4:58pm

kosifantutti23 wrote:This was not retaliation. Milne was reported for his cheap shot to the guts when Joseph wasn't looking. He received the appropriate points and yet people want to whinge and complain.

I'm pretty sure it was Riewoldt who stood on someone's hand last week. Where was his fine?

Crap. The force was negligible not reportable iMO.

Buggers his 5 yr clean record also.

s*** system.