Hey all you Foxtel viewers

[Enrico_Misso]

Was there anything we should be worried about in the TV vision tonight ?

There seemed to be a lot more niggling than usual going on.
Gram, Baker and Milne seemed to lose their cool.

And can someone talk us through the Dal Danto incident ?

[SainterK]

Gram was really upset by something, I didn't see what....I will have to watch the replay

[mad saint guy]

No concerns for the saints. Davey could get a week for jumping into the air and knocking Dal Santo's face with his shoulder. Was a stupid, undisciplined and unnecessary act.

[Enrico_Misso]

Gram was really upset by something, I didn't see what....I will have to watch the replay

I think the "something" was Lovett

[plugger66]

No concerns for the saints. Davey could get a week for jumping into the air and knocking Dal Santo's face with his shoulder. Was a stupid, undisciplined and unnecessary act.

May get points but not much in it at all.

[saintbrat]

there was a second report later in the match on a bomber too I thought, will have to check the replay

I too thought there was more niggle tonight. Bombers were certainly not the FIRST to let go at any time..

[dcstkfc]

I wonder if it is at all related to last year's Riewoldt/Lovett incident when Roo made a comment about Lovett being a missus basher.

[python]

report was on alwyn davey i think, he did something to dal after he disposed of the ball, didnt see what exactly as my eyes followed the ball.

[saint66au]

COrrect..Davey reported.

Yep Grammy was an angry ant over on the Docklands wing for a lil while there...couldnt see what it was all about

[plugger66]

there was a second report later in the match on a bomber too I thought, will have to check the replay

I too thought there was more niggle tonight. Bombers were certainly not the FIRST to let go at any time..

Dont think so.

[python]

riewoldt also had a bit of a push and shove with hooker off the ball halfway through the last, it was odd to see him so frustrated, he rarely gets like that, even on the quiet days (which are just as rare)

[Solar]

there was a second report later in the match on a bomber too I thought, will have to check the replay

I too thought there was more niggle tonight. Bombers were certainly not the FIRST to let go at any time..

Dont think so.

the bombers were alot harder at the body in the second quarter and it seemed to work to change the momentum of the game. The saints players lost track of their game plan and seemed to play the man. Good tactic when it works.

(waiting for plugger to come back and quote it with a well explained argument along of the lines of "dont think so")

[plugger66]

there was a second report later in the match on a bomber too I thought, will have to check the replay

I too thought there was more niggle tonight. Bombers were certainly not the FIRST to let go at any time..

Dont think so.

the bombers were alot harder at the body in the second quarter and it seemed to work to change the momentum of the game. The saints players lost track of their game plan and seemed to play the man. Good tactic when it works.

(waiting for plugger to come back and quote it with a well explained argument along of the lines of "dont think so")

Not much to quote. Just dont think there was a second report. What is wrong with that?

[Ghost Like]

Answer to the OP is no, nothing was highlighted or spoken about. Agree the Davey incident will draw points at worst (for Ess).

[Solar]

there was a second report later in the match on a bomber too I thought, will have to check the replay

I too thought there was more niggle tonight. Bombers were certainly not the FIRST to let go at any time..

Dont think so.

the bombers were alot harder at the body in the second quarter and it seemed to work to change the momentum of the game. The saints players lost track of their game plan and seemed to play the man. Good tactic when it works.

(waiting for plugger to come back and quote it with a well explained argument along of the lines of "dont think so")

Not much to quote. Just dont think there was a second report. What is wrong with that?

if you actually explained your point then perhaps it would look more like a post and less like a sniping effort which is your usual fare.

[plugger66]

there was a second report later in the match on a bomber too I thought, will have to check the replay

I too thought there was more niggle tonight. Bombers were certainly not the FIRST to let go at any time..

Dont think so.

the bombers were alot harder at the body in the second quarter and it seemed to work to change the momentum of the game. The saints players lost track of their game plan and seemed to play the man. Good tactic when it works.

(waiting for plugger to come back and quote it with a well explained argument along of the lines of "dont think so")

Not much to quote. Just dont think there was a second report. What is wrong with that?

if you actually explained your point then perhaps it would look more like a post and less like a sniping effort which is your usual fair.

At it again. please go away and annoy someone else.

[westy]

fare!

[Solar]

there was a second report later in the match on a bomber too I thought, will have to check the replay

I too thought there was more niggle tonight. Bombers were certainly not the FIRST to let go at any time..

Dont think so.

the bombers were alot harder at the body in the second quarter and it seemed to work to change the momentum of the game. The saints players lost track of their game plan and seemed to play the man. Good tactic when it works.

(waiting for plugger to come back and quote it with a well explained argument along of the lines of "dont think so")

Not much to quote. Just dont think there was a second report. What is wrong with that?

if you actually explained your point then perhaps it would look more like a post and less like a sniping effort which is your usual fair.

At it again. please go away and annoy someone else.

At it again?

you spam almost every thread I have read since I have some back from QLD and I make ONE comment in passing and your crying foul.

For someone who seems to lecture people you do not seem to take critisism very well.

You know what the beauty of this board. I can post sensible posts pointing things out and the only one who turns this into annoyance is yourself.

You never know, I might highlight one of your comments next month

[Solar]

fare!

fare cop

[Bernard Shakey]

I wonder if it is at all related to last year's Riewoldt/Lovett incident when Roo made a comment about Lovett being a missus basher.

No way. Roo and Lovett embraced at the end of the game.

[Munga]

I thought Milne was a little slow with his decision making, probably because the bombers are a quicker team.

Dal Santo was poor, really poor by his standards. Turned it over plenty. Hopefully just an off night.

Apart from that, just a quiet game. The bombers threw absolutely everything at us, and I'm glad they did so we know where both of us stand.
I thought we spent most of the game chasing them down, but we still won!

[plugger66]

there was a second report later in the match on a bomber too I thought, will have to check the replay

I too thought there was more niggle tonight. Bombers were certainly not the FIRST to let go at any time..

Dont think so.

the bombers were alot harder at the body in the second quarter and it seemed to work to change the momentum of the game. The saints players lost track of their game plan and seemed to play the man. Good tactic when it works.

(waiting for plugger to come back and quote it with a well explained argument along of the lines of "dont think so")

Not much to quote. Just dont think there was a second report. What is wrong with that?

if you actually explained your point then perhaps it would look more like a post and less like a sniping effort which is your usual fair.

At it again. please go away and annoy someone else.

At it again?

you spam almost every thread I have read since I have some back from QLD and I make ONE comment in passing and your crying foul.

For someone who seems to lecture people you do not seem to take critisism very well.

You know what the beauty of this board. I can post sensible posts pointing things out and the only one who turns this into annoyance is yourself.

You never know, I might highlight one of your comments next month

I make a comment that I dont think there was a second report and you make a smartarse comment. Do you actually have a brain in your head or is it just one solid lump of fat like the rest of you. Now go away and leave me alone like I do to you unless you have some little smartarse thing to say.

[Enrico_Misso]

I thought Milne was a little slow with his decision making, probably because the bombers are a quicker team.

Milne copped a brutal tackle on the 50m arc (hence covered in red dye all night) that seemed to take the wind out of him.
Looked to be quite sore after it.
But still presented himself strongly.

Similarly Schneider man laid some great tackles.

But, unlike last week, both were "missing" to shark lose balls in the forward 50.

[asiu]

The bombers threw absolutely everything at us, and I'm glad they did so...

agree bigtime



good timing , in the bigger picture of things