the magpies forum is bagging the saints and our forum

saintly · Post: # 734958Post **saintly** » Wed 06 May 2009 6:02pm

http://www.magpies.net/nick/bb/viewtopic.php?t=50014

BakesFan · Post: # 734960Post **BakesFan** » Wed 06 May 2009 6:15pm

Who really cares about the opinions from a pack of inbred, feral scum?

Iceman234 · Post: # 734964Post **Iceman234** » Wed 06 May 2009 6:16pm

BakesFan wrote:Who really cares about the opinions from a pack of inbred, feral scum?

You forgot "toothless"

stinger · Post: # 734968Post **stinger** » Wed 06 May 2009 6:28pm

pity the wardon doesn't ban them from using the prison's pcs.......

BakesFan · Post: # 734970Post **BakesFan** » Wed 06 May 2009 6:32pm

....and how many are going to be at the game seeing they can't get their weekend release on a Monday night?

Iceman234 · Post: # 734975Post **Iceman234** » Wed 06 May 2009 6:44pm

BakesFan wrote:....and how many are going to be at the game seeing they can't get their weekend release on a Monday night?

If they leave the roof open at Etihad, can they see in from the Remand Centre?

The Saintsational Man · Wed 06 May 2009 6:45pm

I love attention from trolls.....shows we have them scared!!!

Sunday Red · Post: # 734983Post **Sunday Red** » Wed 06 May 2009 6:55pm

Did you notice how the first few replies on the Collingwood forum basically shot down the OP?

Ghost Like · Post: # 734985Post **Ghost Like** » Wed 06 May 2009 7:00pm

Just had a quick read. Dools is in amongst it...god bless him.

Not a lot to it though, surprisingly a few reasonable posts by some of their supporters...all pretty tame in the whole though, their insults are fairly predictable and unimaginative.

Our 'pie' mate Dave who posted his match review is having a foot in both camps but mainly sooking that people don't rate him or his report because he started it by saying the pies will win.

Poor kid, appears longing for some validation

goodie · Post: # 734986Post **goodie** » Wed 06 May 2009 7:04pm

the stuff i read on this makes me furious , the resort to us as the "filth"

1. Resort?
2. We're hardly alone in 'resorting' to them as that
3. Resort?

Now I realise that, technically speaking, one and three are the same but I thought it was worth mentioning twice.

SaintDebi · Post: # 734987Post **SaintDebi** » Wed 06 May 2009 7:10pm

goodie wrote:
the stuff i read on this makes me furious , the resort to us as the "filth"

1. Resort?
2. We're hardly alone in 'resorting' to them as that
3. Resort?

Now I realise that, technically speaking, one and three are the same but I thought it was worth mentioning twice.

That was the first thing I noticed too, Goodie. Collingwood would be the last thing I'd resort to in any circumstance!
Still, not a bad effort for a pies fan: after all resort and refer both start with the same letter and have the same number of syllables.

GrumpyOne · Post: # 734991Post **GrumpyOne** » Wed 06 May 2009 7:28pm

Just read some of that Collingwood Forum.

I promise never to criticise the spelling on this forum ever again.

santazzi · Post: # 734996Post **santazzi** » Wed 06 May 2009 7:41pm

Hey saintly ....I read through the entire material posted on the link you provided..........I did not understand a thing of what they are trying to say. It is all jibberish.....they cannot be that linguistically challenged....can they?...or did you just make up the link for a laugh......!!!!

VietNam_Saint · Wed 06 May 2009 8:28pm

SaintDebi wrote:
goodie wrote:
the stuff i read on this makes me furious , the resort to us as the "filth"

1. Resort?
2. We're hardly alone in 'resorting' to them as that
3. Resort?

Now I realise that, technically speaking, one and three are the same but I thought it was worth mentioning twice.

Unreal ,, he doesnt know they have been known as the Filth for many years by all.
Hardly surprising I guess.

send out the runner · Wed 06 May 2009 10:19pm

They continually refer to our wooden spoon collection.

I think we gather them up make them into a stack, light it, and hang their sorry arses over the flames.

Every game this year I have gone out of my way to give it to every and any collingwood( they dont even deserve a capital c) first name: Imbe, second name: Cile, supporter I can.

Lived in Sydney for a while, went to a Parramatta game (NRL) there were many, how can I put it " intellectually starved " supporters. Thought I was at a collingwood match. Didn't know who won the game, I just maggot watched.... really enjoyed the day out !!!!

Saint Bev · Post: # 735069Post **Saint Bev** » Wed 06 May 2009 10:40pm

Tools, if we are so pathetic, how come we smashed them in the finals last year

stinger · Post: # 735072Post **stinger** » Wed 06 May 2009 10:46pm

Saint Bev wrote:Tools, if we are so pathetic, how come we smashed them in the finals last year

a fact that the little troll on here has conveniently forgotten....

saintdooley · Wed 06 May 2009 10:53pm

stinger wrote:
Saint Bev wrote:Tools, if we are so pathetic, how come we smashed them in the finals last year

a fact that the little troll on here has conveniently forgotten....

hes not a troll you idiot. he came here to post his write up of the game.
do you think every non saints fan on this site is a troll?

anyway, you are due for another post on the general forum, one of those posts you copy and paste from a news site, and no one reads or replies to.

bobby hancock · Wed 06 May 2009 10:56pm

My first post after years of being the voyeur. That Collingwood link was too much. It's like some scary Children of the Damned horror movie...

Ralphy · Post: # 735076Post **Ralphy** » Wed 06 May 2009 10:57pm

let them bag us... after monday we will know who the real winners are

stinger · Post: # 735079Post **stinger** » Wed 06 May 2009 11:04pm

saintdooley wrote:
stinger wrote:
Saint Bev wrote:Tools, if we are so pathetic, how come we smashed them in the finals last year

a fact that the little troll on here has conveniently forgotten....
hes not a troll you idiot. he came here to post his write up of the game.
do you think every non saints fan on this site is a troll?
anyway, you are due for another post on the general forum, one of those posts you copy and paste from a news site, and no one reads or replies to.

you state that the saints premiership team only had 18 players because there was no interchange bench...then you have the cheek to call me an idiot......why don't you stick to brown nosing with your filth mates......
or booing saints players from the safety of our pathetic cheer squad....

.if you can't spot a troll that's not my problem....

anyway it's past your bedtime and i think your mummy is calling you....

bigred · Post: # 735090Post **bigred** » Wed 06 May 2009 11:22pm

My Grandfather always told me to refer to Collingwood as the "Filth".

No foolin....when I was like six years old.

Always have, always will.

saintdooley · Wed 06 May 2009 11:24pm

^^ i never said we only had 18 players back then, there would of been reserves etc...but there was no interchange bench in the 60's

sendmehomehappy · Wed 06 May 2009 11:25pm

Well notice over there on Nick's filth site, they've all got tiny blue things on their avatars.

Hit on them and up comes Leo or Aries etc.

They're all into astology! Consistent with their collective non-brainpower.

All the planets will need to line up in a big V for Victory shape for Collingwood to have a hope of winning on Monday. Get out our telescopes and wait for it.

Guys, what's wrong with your crystal balls? Polish them up now and see the real future!

stinger · Post: # 735097Post **stinger** » Wed 06 May 2009 11:29pm

saintdooley wrote:^^ i never said we only had 18 players back then, there would of been reserves etc...but there was no interchange bench in the 60's

...didn't your mummy teach you that if you tell lies your nose will grow.....

...this is what you actually said..

". what i said came out wrong.
what i mean is that so many people brag about their club having so many premierships, yet a lot of them were not even born for the 1990 one. IMO people shouldnt be braging about a premiership unless they saw it or they were there. you dont see many of us sainters going around talking about 66, and we shouldnt be because about 50% of our supporters were not born back then. but this does not mean i dont care about that premiership and dont respect the players who played that day. any player who plays in an AFL/VFL Grand Final should be rememberd and honoured by the blub, and i respect all our players who were there that day and won our clubs only premiership. what is very sad that a lot of you may not know is that last year one of the blokes died, so back then there were 18 in a team (no interchange bench) and we now only have 17 of them remaining.
i respect your blub and the way they have won 14 premierships, and all those past players. i just dont respect people who brag about having 14 premierships when some were not even born in 1990 for your last one.
"

there are 19 left ......not 17 ffs.....