Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
I reckon B4E might be thinking to himself should he divulge any information from the meeting to the people who mocked him for asking in the first place?
In some respects cant say I blame him
As for the validity of the meeting, his track record on following through on this sort of thing is very good. I have no reason whatsoever to doubt the meeting took place
saint66au wrote:I reckon B4E might be thinking to himself should he divulge any information from the meeting to the people who mocked him for asking in the first place?
In some respects cant say I blame him
As for the validity of the meeting, his track record on following through on this sort of thing is very good. I have no reason whatsoever to doubt the meeting took place
GrumpyOne wrote:Is nobody else going to call this?
OK...... I will.
Did not happen.
Complete fabrication by B4.
Bet 1 player sponsor share that B4 cannot back this meeting up with one confirmable bit of evidence.
C'mon Grumpy, show me the money!
Up it or shut it!
Barks, I'll give you a share to put us all out of our misery!
Remember I've got 23 left to 'unload' so giving you 1 is not an issue.
And you never know how lucky a single share can be?
Ask Ralphy who has a single share and won 2 tickets to teh pre-season launch.
saint66au wrote:I reckon B4E might be thinking to himself should he divulge any information from the meeting to the people who mocked him for asking in the first place?
In some respects cant say I blame him
As for the validity of the meeting, his track record on following through on this sort of thing is very good. I have no reason whatsoever to doubt the meeting took place
great but considering your history of defending him and not banning when should...
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
GrumpyOne wrote:Is nobody else going to call this?
OK...... I will.
Did not happen.
Complete fabrication by B4.
Bet 1 player sponsor share that B4 cannot back this meeting up with one confirmable bit of evidence.
C'mon Grumpy, show me the money!
Up it or shut it!
The dosh is only coming from one direction ATM..... That share is worth twice your net assets B4, what will you put on the table?
Name your price and I'll match it!
Mine's on the table.
So if I provide verifiable evidence you are betting one player sponsor share?
What is the net benefit to me?
Why would I be interested in one player sponsor share?
I'd prefer a tube of KY jelly and happy hour at the Peel on Tranny night, which I might add will not suffice, c'mon make it meaningful Grumpy, if ya have da ball's that is!
You made the call, back it up with something more substantial!!!!!!!!!!
Am I bluffing, do you hold the aces, c'mon Grumps, you can do better than that surely!
saint66au wrote:I reckon B4E might be thinking to himself should he divulge any information from the meeting to the people who mocked him for asking in the first place?
In some respects cant say I blame him
As for the validity of the meeting, his track record on following through on this sort of thing is very good. I have no reason whatsoever to doubt the meeting took place
You read my thoughts precisely, well done Michael
LOL...
Given your rantings on here which border on the psychotic.. you should fess up.
What a crock.
You made the running with all the accusations and carried on like a blithering idiot.
So maybe YOU should put up, eh? Instead of running around like 5YO... I've got a secret and I'm not telling, infatile attitude.
If nothing more than to show that you have a modicum of self-respect... given all the accusations and racial understones you've posted about the matter.
Either you were right... or you were wrong.
History shows that you tend to go quiet when you're wrong. So which one was it this time?
It's no wonder you get mocked on a regular basis, with the immaturity you show on here sometimes.
The lid is off after Round 2! Enjoy the journey, coz you just don't know where we'll end up. Live for today and seize the moment.
saint66au wrote:I reckon B4E might be thinking to himself should he divulge any information from the meeting to the people who mocked him for asking in the first place?
In some respects cant say I blame him
As for the validity of the meeting, his track record on following through on this sort of thing is very good. I have no reason whatsoever to doubt the meeting took place
You read my thoughts precisely, well done Michael
LOL...
Given your rantings on here which border on the psychotic.. you should fess up.
What a crock.
You made the running with all the accusations and carried on like a blithering idiot.
So maybe YOU should put up, eh? Instead of running around like 5YO... I've got a secret and I'm not telling, infatile attitude.
If nothing more than to show that you have a modicum of self-respect... given all the accusations and racial understones you've posted about the matter.
Either you were right... or you were wrong.
History shows that you tend to go quiet when you're wrong. So which one was it this time?
It's no wonder you get mocked on a regular basis, with the immaturity you show on here sometimes.
she/he/hippie/captain useless in life will not respond to this due to formuluating a theory as to how the jewish regime screwed st kilda over
saint66au wrote:I reckon B4E might be thinking to himself should he divulge any information from the meeting to the people who mocked him for asking in the first place?
In some respects cant say I blame him
As for the validity of the meeting, his track record on following through on this sort of thing is very good. I have no reason whatsoever to doubt the meeting took place
Do you support everything he does? If he thinks he shouldnt divulge anything from the meeting why bring it up. I think I have a clue. To big note himself. As he brought it up then tell us what happened or delete the thread. We know he met him so big deal.
If I was to find out that one skerrick of confidential information was passed onto someone outside of the club, by our departing CEO - I'd be staggered, shocked and appalled.
I'd guess that the club's lawyers would be staggered, shocked and appalled too.
To those who still believe footy clubs are 'big business' run by serious people - this thread is Exhibit A in the prosecution.
I'm sure if it happened he told him nothing and took him nowhere... and even if this is not entirely the case.... who gives a flying rats.
But if our CEO has nothing better to do on a Monday morning, days out from round 1, than to meet with a serial-malcontent supporter for an hour and a half... oh dear.
!!
