Issues

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10799
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2372 times

Re: Issues

Post: # 2046352Post B.M »

Sharman went back because

Windhager went from defence to midfield
Ross went midfield to Sub
Collard sub to forward
Sharman went forward to defence

I think they took about 2 or 3 contested marks i50

Compared to 50 possessions between our running defenders Nas and Bonner

Stocker smashed Stengle


Lennylegs
Club Player
Posts: 206
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2020 8:14pm
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 144 times

Re: Issues

Post: # 2046354Post Lennylegs »

I thought stocker was great


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18406
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1496 times
Been thanked: 1855 times

Re: Issues

Post: # 2046359Post SaintPav »

Swap Pou for Owens in the midfield.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
BringBackMadDog
Club Player
Posts: 1956
Joined: Thu 05 Aug 2004 9:29am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 129 times

Re: Issues

Post: # 2046377Post BringBackMadDog »

Vortex wrote: Sun 17 Mar 2024 12:55pm
B.M wrote: Sun 17 Mar 2024 12:12pm Forward line is not the issue - or at least it wasn’t last night

44 entries is horrendous

Look at the source
Absolutely no argument the midfield is well off the pace.

But we had 23 looks at goal, only 3 behind the Cats?

Our efficiency i50 was over 10% better than the Cats also.

Out stoppage clearance was better by 12 points also.

But did you think the forward line played well?
Well based on your stats, the forward line was great considering the lack of opportunity. We had 19 less i50 but only 3 less scoring shots.


Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6009
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 804 times
Been thanked: 939 times

Re: Issues

Post: # 2046382Post Vortex »

BringBackMadDog wrote: Sun 17 Mar 2024 8:55pm
Vortex wrote: Sun 17 Mar 2024 12:55pm
B.M wrote: Sun 17 Mar 2024 12:12pm Forward line is not the issue - or at least it wasn’t last night

44 entries is horrendous

Look at the source
Absolutely no argument the midfield is well off the pace.

But we had 23 looks at goal, only 3 behind the Cats?

Our efficiency i50 was over 10% better than the Cats also.

Out stoppage clearance was better by 12 points also.

But did you think the forward line played well?
Well based on your stats, the forward line was great considering the lack of opportunity. We had 19 less i50 but only 3 less scoring shots.
Both sides played poorly, it was a really low standard from both teams. Geelong fans should be concerned. They had home ground advantage and still only got over the line thanks to Cameron's freak goals.


Post Reply