Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4125
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1327 times

Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2040934Post cwrcyn »

2020

Steele
Ross
Hill
Jones
Clark (played half back)
Hannebery (did not play)
Billings
Dunstan
Bytel (2nd year player)
Byrnes (first year player)



2024


Steele
Ross
Hill
Jones

Clark
Dow
Owens
Windhager
Henry
Byrnes
Hotton (2nd year player)
Phillipou (2nd year player)
Wilson (1st year player)

We've certainly added more numbers and greater speed. Hard to believe we made finals in 2020 with so few options in the midfield


loris
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4524
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
Has thanked: 331 times
Been thanked: 408 times

Re: Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2040935Post loris »

You’ve forgotten Crouch😇


AnythingsPossibleSaints
SS Life Member
Posts: 3152
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 2:44am
Location: Next to what's next to me.
Has thanked: 71 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Re: Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2040937Post AnythingsPossibleSaints »

loris wrote: Sun 28 Jan 2024 1:04pm You’ve forgotten Crouch😇
And Maso Wood 😉


YOU GET WHAT YOU SETTLE FOR.
AnythingsPossibleSaints
SS Life Member
Posts: 3152
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 2:44am
Location: Next to what's next to me.
Has thanked: 71 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Re: Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2040939Post AnythingsPossibleSaints »

We certainly could have one of the best outside running brigades in the comp, with Wood, Hill, Henry, Byrnes and Wilson all genuine options for the wing, or high half-forward. Then with the likes of Sincs, Wangmil, Windy, Clark and Bonner options off half back. That’s some serious running power.

If we can get Steele back to his beastly best on the inside and a few step up to help him in there we could be very hard to beat most weeks.

With Steele well short of his best for most of last season, or missing altogether, we would have had one of the 3 or 4 weakest midfields in the comp, so there’s loads of scope for improvement there, as there obviously is with the forward line.

Which augurs well for us when you consider the fact we were top 6 for all bar one week of the H&A season year.

Yet almost all the “experts” are tipping us to be considerably worse. It doesn’t make a heap of sense.


YOU GET WHAT YOU SETTLE FOR.
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22499
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8422 times
Been thanked: 3723 times

Re: Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2040942Post saynta »

AnythingsPossibleSaints wrote: Sun 28 Jan 2024 2:06pm We certainly could have one of the best outside running brigades in the comp, with Wood, Hill, Henry, Byrnes and Wilson all genuine options for the wing, or high half-forward. Then with the likes of Sincs, Wangmil, Windy, Clark and Bonner options off half back. That’s some serious running power.

If we can get Steele back to his beastly best on the inside and a few step up to help him in there we could be very hard to beat most weeks.

With Steele well short of his best for most of last season, or missing altogether, we would have had one of the 3 or 4 weakest midfields in the comp, so there’s loads of scope for improvement there, as there obviously is with the forward line.

Which augurs well for us when you consider the fact we were top 6 for all bar one week of the H&A season year.

Yet almost all the “experts” are tipping us to be considerably worse. It doesn’t make a heap of sense.
No love and no respect from those clowns who are still pissed off that we showed up their lack of football smarts last year.

Who cares? Not I.


Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6009
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 804 times
Been thanked: 939 times

Re: Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2040944Post Vortex »

cwrcyn wrote: Sun 28 Jan 2024 12:48pm 2020

Steele
Ross
Hill
Jones
Clark (played half back)
Hannebery (did not play)
Billings
Dunstan
Bytel (2nd year player)
Byrnes (first year player)



2024


Steele
Ross
Hill
Jones

Clark
Dow
Owens
Windhager
Henry
Byrnes
Hotton (2nd year player)
Phillipou (2nd year player)
Wilson (1st year player)

We've certainly added more numbers and greater speed. Hard to believe we made finals in 2020 with so few options in the midfield
The Covid Cup was way to compromised to use it as a true measure, clearly we adapted to the hub life better than most which afforded us a fake finals appearance.


Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6009
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 804 times
Been thanked: 939 times

Re: Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2040945Post Vortex »

AnythingsPossibleSaints wrote: Sun 28 Jan 2024 2:06pm We certainly could have one of the best outside running brigades in the comp, with Wood, Hill, Henry, Byrnes and Wilson all genuine options for the wing, or high half-forward. Then with the likes of Sincs, Wangmil, Windy, Clark and Bonner options off half back. That’s some serious running power.

If we can get Steele back to his beastly best on the inside and a few step up to help him in there we could be very hard to beat most weeks.

With Steele well short of his best for most of last season, or missing altogether, we would have had one of the 3 or 4 weakest midfields in the comp, so there’s loads of scope for improvement there, as there obviously is with the forward line.

Which augurs well for us when you consider the fact we were top 6 for all bar one week of the H&A season year.

Yet almost all the “experts” are tipping us to be considerably worse. It doesn’t make a heap of sense.
I think the prevailing consensus is we were afforded a very easy draw that helped us pick up cheap wins early and then looked very average through the middle of the season even struggling against Hawks, North and West Coast. And then we were lucky towards the back end of the season with many results from other teams around us on the ladder falling our way. And even though we started to play better in the final month or so of the H&A to scrape into the finals, we were shown to be only making up the numbers against GWS.

Id say that is what is leading most footy pundits who aren't one eyed Sainters to predict a slide.


User avatar
Life Long Saint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5356
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
Has thanked: 56 times
Been thanked: 447 times
Contact:

Re: Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2040946Post Life Long Saint »

Vortex wrote: Sun 28 Jan 2024 4:08pm I think the prevailing consensus is we were afforded a very easy draw that helped us pick up cheap wins early and then looked very average through the middle of the season even struggling against Hawks, North and West Coast. And then we were lucky towards the back end of the season with many results from other teams around us on the ladder falling our way. And even though we started to play better in the final month or so of the H&A to scrape into the finals, we were shown to be only making up the numbers against GWS.

Id say that is what is leading most footy pundits who aren't one eyed Sainters to predict a slide.
The first three early "cheap wins" were against Fremantle (2022 finalists), Bulldogs (2022 finalists and tipped to go higher in 23), and Essendon (also tipped to be a serious finals contender).
Essendon were flying when we played them, so the "cheap" wins were not so cheap. They won their next two games after they lost to us including a win over Melbourne.

What we really lacked last year (and for many years) is a killer instict to bury teams when we should. We blew a 20 point lead with a five goal turn around against the Hawks. We fell over the line against West Coast and North (8 points each game).
Good teams make sure those games are easy wins and percentage boosters.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22499
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8422 times
Been thanked: 3723 times

Re: Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2040947Post saynta »

Vortex wrote: Sun 28 Jan 2024 3:51pm
cwrcyn wrote: Sun 28 Jan 2024 12:48pm 2020

Steele
Ross
Hill
Jones
Clark (played half back)
Hannebery (did not play)
Billings
Dunstan
Bytel (2nd year player)
Byrnes (first year player)



2024


Steele
Ross
Hill
Jones

Clark
Dow
Owens
Windhager
Henry
Byrnes
Hotton (2nd year player)
Phillipou (2nd year player)
Wilson (1st year player)

We've certainly added more numbers and greater speed. Hard to believe we made finals in 2020 with so few options in the midfield
The Covid Cup was way to compromised to use it as a true measure, clearly we adapted to the hub life better than most which afforded us a fake finals appearance.
A finals appearance is exactly that, a finals appearance. Nothing fake about it all all. A very stupid comment.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22499
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8422 times
Been thanked: 3723 times

Re: Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2040948Post saynta »

Vortex wrote: Sun 28 Jan 2024 4:08pm
AnythingsPossibleSaints wrote: Sun 28 Jan 2024 2:06pm We certainly could have one of the best outside running brigades in the comp, with Wood, Hill, Henry, Byrnes and Wilson all genuine options for the wing, or high half-forward. Then with the likes of Sincs, Wangmil, Windy, Clark and Bonner options off half back. That’s some serious running power.

If we can get Steele back to his beastly best on the inside and a few step up to help him in there we could be very hard to beat most weeks.

With Steele well short of his best for most of last season, or missing altogether, we would have had one of the 3 or 4 weakest midfields in the comp, so there’s loads of scope for improvement there, as there obviously is with the forward line.

Which augurs well for us when you consider the fact we were top 6 for all bar one week of the H&A season year.

Yet almost all the “experts” are tipping us to be considerably worse. It doesn’t make a heap of sense.
I think the prevailing consensus is we were afforded a very easy draw that helped us pick up cheap wins early and then looked very average through the middle of the season even struggling against Hawks, North and West Coast. And then we were lucky towards the back end of the season with many results from other teams around us on the ladder falling our way. And even though we started to play better in the final month or so of the H&A to scrape into the finals, we were shown to be only making up the numbers against GWS.

Id say that is what is leading most footy pundits who aren't one eyed Sainters to predict a slide.
Or anti saints posters like you.


AnythingsPossibleSaints
SS Life Member
Posts: 3152
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 2:44am
Location: Next to what's next to me.
Has thanked: 71 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Re: Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2040949Post AnythingsPossibleSaints »

Vortex wrote: Sun 28 Jan 2024 3:51pm
cwrcyn wrote: Sun 28 Jan 2024 12:48pm 2020

Steele
Ross
Hill
Jones
Clark (played half back)
Hannebery (did not play)
Billings
Dunstan
Bytel (2nd year player)
Byrnes (first year player)



2024


Steele
Ross
Hill
Jones

Clark
Dow
Owens
Windhager
Henry
Byrnes
Hotton (2nd year player)
Phillipou (2nd year player)
Wilson (1st year player)

We've certainly added more numbers and greater speed. Hard to believe we made finals in 2020 with so few options in the midfield
The Covid Cup was way to compromised to use it as a true measure, clearly we adapted to the hub life better than most which afforded us a fake finals appearance.
That’s certainly an interesting theory, but here’s a fun fact. Before we went up to the hub, in R6, do you know where we were on the ladder?

4th.

So we were actually higher on the ladder in non-hub football than we subsequently were in hub football.

And in hub football we beat the top team Port, in Adelaide, 73 to 44, and they obviously adapted to “hub life” very well, hence being on top of the ladder. Yet we comprehensively beat them. While we lost to 2nd on the ladder Brisbane by just 2 points, at the Gabba.

We were a good team that year, in and out of the hub.


YOU GET WHAT YOU SETTLE FOR.
Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6009
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 804 times
Been thanked: 939 times

Re: Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2040951Post Vortex »

AnythingsPossibleSaints wrote: Sun 28 Jan 2024 4:51pm
Vortex wrote: Sun 28 Jan 2024 3:51pm
cwrcyn wrote: Sun 28 Jan 2024 12:48pm 2020

Steele
Ross
Hill
Jones
Clark (played half back)
Hannebery (did not play)
Billings
Dunstan
Bytel (2nd year player)
Byrnes (first year player)



2024


Steele
Ross
Hill
Jones

Clark
Dow
Owens
Windhager
Henry
Byrnes
Hotton (2nd year player)
Phillipou (2nd year player)
Wilson (1st year player)

We've certainly added more numbers and greater speed. Hard to believe we made finals in 2020 with so few options in the midfield
The Covid Cup was way to compromised to use it as a true measure, clearly we adapted to the hub life better than most which afforded us a fake finals appearance.
That’s certainly an interesting theory, but here’s a fun fact. Before we went up to the hub, in R6, do you know where we were on the ladder?

4th.

So we were actually higher on the ladder in non-hub football than we subsequently were in hub football.

And in hub football we beat the top team Port, in Adelaide, 73 to 44, and they obviously adapted to “hub life” very well, hence being on top of the ladder. Yet we comprehensively beat them. While we lost to 2nd on the ladder Brisbane by just 2 points, at the Gabba.

We were a good team that year, in and out of the hub.
It was a terribly compromised competition and if we were a very good side then there was a significant correction the following year when the competition returned to full strength.


cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4125
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1327 times

Re: Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2040955Post cwrcyn »

It's been a long time since we had this many midfield options. The good thing is the ones we've added are not the treacle slow types like Dunstan and Bytel. It's up to Brendan Goddard to now make them a cohesive, dynamic and organised unit


User avatar
Impatient Sainter
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4089
Joined: Tue 05 Apr 2016 3:30pm
Has thanked: 2622 times
Been thanked: 1077 times

Re: Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2040982Post Impatient Sainter »

If we can win first use of the footy this year, we will slice teams up on the outside similarly to Collingwood last year.

Contested marking is something we need to improve in as a group.


Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6009
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 804 times
Been thanked: 939 times

Re: Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2040983Post Vortex »

cwrcyn wrote: Sun 28 Jan 2024 6:53pm It's been a long time since we had this many midfield options. The good thing is the ones we've added are not the treacle slow types like Dunstan and Bytel. It's up to Brendan Goddard to now make them a cohesive, dynamic and organised unit
Whilst the list of midfielders is now growing in the right direction it’s probably important to temper expectations with regards to available midfielders who can compete with the elite midfields around the top 4 of the ladder throughout 2024.

Our midfield department is still very much a work in progress and will need another season or two to develop and/or determine if some of our recent additions have A grade or elite capabilities.

What will be helpful is if we can get some service out of the likes of Jones in his final years while we are in this development stage.


nostalgicsaint
Club Player
Posts: 813
Joined: Mon 20 Jan 2020 7:38am
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 236 times

Re: Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2040987Post nostalgicsaint »

Vortex wrote: Mon 29 Jan 2024 11:56am
cwrcyn wrote: Sun 28 Jan 2024 6:53pm It's been a long time since we had this many midfield options. The good thing is the ones we've added are not the treacle slow types like Dunstan and Bytel. It's up to Brendan Goddard to now make them a cohesive, dynamic and organised unit
Whilst the list of midfielders is now growing in the right direction it’s probably important to temper expectations with regards to available midfielders who can compete with the elite midfields around the top 4 of the ladder throughout 2024.

Our midfield department is still very much a work in progress and will need another season or two to develop and/or determine if some of our recent additions have A grade or elite capabilities.

What will be helpful is if we can get some service out of the likes of Jones in his final years while we are in this development stage.

Agree with this. If we break them into 3 categories.

Able to compete currently
Steele
Crouch
Ross
Wood
Hill
Byrnes (can he step up to his best footy consistently)
Henry
Dow (can he prove Carlton wrong)
Jones (injury prone)

Potential to compete this year
Pou
Owens
Windhager

Developing
Wilson
Hotton


It highlights how important Pou, Owens and Windy are to us this year and the lack of genuine star power in the top group.


Disclaimer: posts are my views and shouldn't be taken as fact, even if I am in fact right.
cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4125
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1327 times

Re: Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2040988Post cwrcyn »

We really need the youngsters to shine. Ross probably has two seasons left, Crouch three.

The key is mids who can really run. The difference that Walsh makes for Carlton is enormous. Same with Neale at Brisbane, and Oliver at Melbourne. Having that kind of tank combine with speed is a real advantage.

It's critical that Hotton, Henry, and Wilson prove to be the goods. Owens can be our Paddy Cripps and windhager the lock down mid. This other guys can add the relentless running


Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6009
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 804 times
Been thanked: 939 times

Re: Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2041006Post Vortex »

nostalgicsaint wrote: Mon 29 Jan 2024 1:37pm
Vortex wrote: Mon 29 Jan 2024 11:56am
cwrcyn wrote: Sun 28 Jan 2024 6:53pm It's been a long time since we had this many midfield options. The good thing is the ones we've added are not the treacle slow types like Dunstan and Bytel. It's up to Brendan Goddard to now make them a cohesive, dynamic and organised unit
Whilst the list of midfielders is now growing in the right direction it’s probably important to temper expectations with regards to available midfielders who can compete with the elite midfields around the top 4 of the ladder throughout 2024.

Our midfield department is still very much a work in progress and will need another season or two to develop and/or determine if some of our recent additions have A grade or elite capabilities.

What will be helpful is if we can get some service out of the likes of Jones in his final years while we are in this development stage.

Agree with this. If we break them into 3 categories.

Able to compete currently
Steele
Crouch
Ross
Wood
Hill
Byrnes (can he step up to his best footy consistently)
Henry
Dow (can he prove Carlton wrong)
Jones (injury prone)

Potential to compete this year
Pou
Owens
Windhager

Developing
Wilson
Hotton


It highlights how important Pou, Owens and Windy are to us this year and the lack of genuine star power in the top group.
I think Byrnes has peaked and will/must get pushed out if we are to become a top 4 contender.

Pou will need 2 or more years before he can endure a full season and some finals and be capable of competing with the elite midfielders in the final 2 weeks of September.

We will have a better idea at season end if Dow is A, B or C grade.

Henry is the one I'm looking forward to see in the RW&B.

And here's hoping Steele's shoulder holds up, outside of that I'm with Ross, I want to see him light it up in the midfield more, Steele needs to look to be first to win the ball and get us going forward more rather than be second to the ball to be the stopper and rack up the tackle stats.


Killa
Club Player
Posts: 630
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2021 10:27am
Been thanked: 264 times

Re: Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2041013Post Killa »

And you could be excused for offering that if we had not lost Carlisle, Ryder and Long we may have gone a bit further

Carlisle was particularly missed v Richmond where both he and Long received Brownlow votes when we beat them thru the season (so Carlisle took out Lynch who was a problem for us in the finals)

And Ryder was just class


Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6009
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 804 times
Been thanked: 939 times

Re: Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2041014Post Vortex »

Killa wrote: Mon 29 Jan 2024 10:18pm And you could be excused for offering that if we had not lost Carlisle, Ryder and Long we may have gone a bit further

Carlisle was particularly missed v Richmond where both he and Long received Brownlow votes when we beat them thru the season (so Carlisle took out Lynch who was a problem for us in the finals)

And Ryder was just class
Absolutely those three names not being in the side would have helped but realistically had we come up against Richmond in a full strength competition the year before then I think most footy pundits would agree we were way off the pace. It's pointless really to make any comparisons with results from the Covid Cup as the season was severely compromised and is not comparing apples with apples.


Killa
Club Player
Posts: 630
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2021 10:27am
Been thanked: 264 times

Re: Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2041028Post Killa »

But you could put that it was a more even contest, basically absent home grounds and the reduced number of Minor Round games.

Simply, each side had a full List of available players with whom to compete.


Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6009
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 804 times
Been thanked: 939 times

Re: Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2041037Post Vortex »

Killa wrote: Tue 30 Jan 2024 6:43pm But you could put that it was a more even contest, basically absent home grounds and the reduced number of Minor Round games.

Simply, each side had a full List of available players with whom to compete.
Possibly, but for every argument that attempts to present the Covid Cup as a comp that was equal to a full strength comp and not a circuis only concocted to keep the gates open for booze and gambling revenue, there are 10 counter arguments.


AnythingsPossibleSaints
SS Life Member
Posts: 3152
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 2:44am
Location: Next to what's next to me.
Has thanked: 71 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Re: Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2041070Post AnythingsPossibleSaints »

cwrcyn wrote: Mon 29 Jan 2024 2:48pm We really need the youngsters to shine. Ross probably has two seasons left, Crouch three.

The key is mids who can really run. The difference that Walsh makes for Carlton is enormous. Same with Neale at Brisbane, and Oliver at Melbourne. Having that kind of tank combine with speed is a real advantage.

It's critical that Hotton, Henry, and Wilson prove to be the goods. Owens can be our Paddy Cripps and windhager the lock down mid. This other guys can add the relentless running
I agree that Seb and Crouch probably have 2-3 years each where they could keep playing at the level, but if we’re going to go places, we really need the likes of Owens, Clark, Dow, Windhager and Phillipou to push those two out of the side ASAP.

If we have a good run with injuries I reckon Seb could start to be pushed back to sub duties or further as soon as this year.

On the inside we’ll all-things-equal have Steele and Crouch, and probably/hopefully Dow and Clark, and ideally Jones, with the likes of Owens, Windy and Pou rotating through there more, which makes it really hard to see where Seb fits, as he’s not great on a wing, and out there he’d be competing with the likes of Wood, Henry, Hill, Byrnes and Wilson.

So I could see him being squeezed out as soon as this year and if Owens starts to own the midfield Fyfe-style, and Clark happens to start producing the goods consistently in there, Crouch could be squeezed out the season after.

Those two are good soldiers to have in your team when you just want to be competitive, but if you really want to contend, you ideally need guys who are just that next level up. Especially if you can really only play one position, like Crouch.


YOU GET WHAT YOU SETTLE FOR.
Killa
Club Player
Posts: 630
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2021 10:27am
Been thanked: 264 times

Re: Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2041076Post Killa »

But with the draw including who and when you play the competition is “concocted to keep the gates open”

The draw and the venues were compromised pre vaccine and then pre the vaccination levels as put by the medical experts and adopted by National Cabinet being achieved (was the figure 80%?)

But each Club had their List of players available so the quality of the competition was not compromised

The assessment of the List as put by Rattan when called upon to interview for his then job and agreed by the Board remains

The challenge for the Football Department to continue to address that assessment similarly remains

I am one who is of the view that firstly you need to bridge the gap to the premiership side then improve by another 20% because all other teams will improve

And the only time you can pass opinion on progress is once the season starts and we see the structure of the side and results

It is a results driven competition

Which is not unique across life


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18406
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1496 times
Been thanked: 1855 times

Re: Our midfield/wing options 2020 v 2024

Post: # 2041088Post SaintPav »

Killa wrote: Wed 31 Jan 2024 3:13pm But with the draw including who and when you play the competition is “concocted to keep the gates open”

The draw and the venues were compromised pre vaccine and then pre the vaccination levels as put by the medical experts and adopted by National Cabinet being achieved (was the figure 80%?)

But each Club had their List of players available so the quality of the competition was not compromised

The assessment of the List as put by Rattan when called upon to interview for his then job and agreed by the Board remains

The challenge for the Football Department to continue to address that assessment similarly remains

I am one who is of the view that firstly you need to bridge the gap to the premiership side then improve by another 20% because all other teams will improve

And the only time you can pass opinion on progress is once the season starts and we see the structure of the side and results

It is a results driven competition

Which is not unique across life
Yep. The target changed to 95% shortly later. It changed again the following year to 100% and now the moving target stands at around 500% after you're supposed to have your fourth booster.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Post Reply