Hannebury - Indefinite

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5788 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1807916Post Ghost Like »

barks4eva wrote: Wed 17 Jul 2019 8:38pm
Ghost Like wrote: Wed 17 Jul 2019 7:56pm
barks4eva wrote: Wed 17 Jul 2019 12:23pm
Ghost Like wrote: Wed 17 Jul 2019 11:26am Thank god Lethlean got him cheap. Would be interested to know which way his contract is loaded. We may have paid 1.6mill for this year.
Cheap ?
Surely you're joking.

$800,000 a year for four years = 3.2 million for a broken down, injury riddled player way past his prime.
St.kilda also forfeited their 2nd round draft selection position in this years draft which is likely to be pick 20, 21, or 22.
THIS IS NOT CHEAP, particularly for a player who is only going to play two games this year.
I predicted Hannebery would play six games at best this year before breaking down on the day they recruited him.

It was clearly obvious to anyone with a clue that Dan Hannebery was cooked after two very ordinary and injury riddled years.
I was hoping the club/Lethlean would not be so stupid when I first heard they were interested.

Simon Lethlean's decision making is shoddy at best.
The fact that he cheated on his wife is evidence of his poor decision making and is the only reason the club has him in this position at the St.kilda football club in a role he has never held before. Shipped off to St.kilda as a dumping ground to resurrect his corporate career and now the football club has to endure this foolish incompetence and his flawed decision making.

He offered 1.4 million for Dylan Shiel which would have cost the club pick four and Max King.
The only thing that saved him from making another huge mistake was Dylan Shiel rejecting St.kilda's/ Lethlean's offer.

This year Hannebery has cost the club $400,000 for each game he has played.
And you write "Thank god Lethlean got him cheap" :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

Then there is the matter of Lethlean being good mates with Hannebery's father.

Given Lethlean is good mates with Brad Scott he should not be on the selection committee for the next coach.
Given his decisions on Hannebery and Shiel he should not be on the selection committee of anything to do with this football club.
Both Lethlean and Finnis should be shown the door right now just like Alan Richardson was.

Both of these AFL snake oil salesmen have made horrendous decisions affecting the forward trajectory of the football club.

Is it any wonder the St.kilda football club is looked upon as a basket case when it's had buffoon's calling the shots for almost it's entire history.
Yes Barks, I was taking the P1SS with the opening comment. If you've read my thoughts on his contract & amount you'd have a very clear idea on my thoughts.

Just thought I'd try some HM fishing, didn't expect to find myself as Captain Ahab. All good!
Cheers

I read many posts from people around the time he was recruited saying at least it didn't cost much which is completely ridiculous.
Lethlean gave up St.kilda's second round draft selection position for Hannebery on top of all the free money for a player who was cooked and anyone with a clue could clearly see he was cooked.
Incompetence on steroids.
I feel your pain Barks, nothing about the deal made sense. Someone on another thread suggested a part TWO to this trade, possibly this year. Whilst on the whole trading with Sydney has been mutually beneficial, I'm sure they couldn't believe there luck when Lethlean walked through the door with his offer. I'm also sure they won't be giving us Jones or a Fiorini because we were so accommodating with Dan Scanaweekly.

Let's pray we are not paying out Buddy's last 3 years with an option of two more if he's not in a wheelchair at the end of 2022.


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18555
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1527 times
Been thanked: 1878 times

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1807924Post SaintPav »

Don't hold your breath on a part 2 deal.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
Furphy
Club Player
Posts: 781
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005 2:48pm
Location: Berwick
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1807926Post Furphy »

tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: Wed 17 Jul 2019 1:00pm He'll be right. Not worth risking this year if not a 100%. Pointless and stupid. Fact is, we need a champion of the game with leadership skills for our young list. When he gets fully right, he is a class above the rest.
'A ship in the harbour is safe, but that's not what ships are built for' Old proverb


User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5788 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1807931Post Ghost Like »

Furphy wrote: Wed 17 Jul 2019 11:08pm
tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: Wed 17 Jul 2019 1:00pm He'll be right. Not worth risking this year if not a 100%. Pointless and stupid. Fact is, we need a champion of the game with leadership skills for our young list. When he gets fully right, he is a class above the rest.
'A ship in the harbour is safe, but that's not what ships are built for' Old proverb
Great saying! Did I hear that in a movie or TV ad?


chook23
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7258
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:31am
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 136 times

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1807932Post chook23 »

Ghost Like wrote: Wed 17 Jul 2019 11:28pm
Furphy wrote: Wed 17 Jul 2019 11:08pm
tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: Wed 17 Jul 2019 1:00pm He'll be right. Not worth risking this year if not a 100%. Pointless and stupid. Fact is, we need a champion of the game with leadership skills for our young list. When he gets fully right, he is a class above the rest.
'A ship in the harbour is safe, but that's not what ships are built for' Old proverb
Great saying! Did I hear that in a movie or TV ad?
It was in a tv add


saint4life
User avatar
Enrico_Misso
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11662
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
Has thanked: 315 times
Been thanked: 720 times

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1807934Post Enrico_Misso »

tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: Wed 17 Jul 2019 10:02pm We are 1 year into 5 years. Quit the hysteria.
But this year should be the best of the five!


The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules. 
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
User avatar
Furphy
Club Player
Posts: 781
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005 2:48pm
Location: Berwick
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1807935Post Furphy »

Ghost Like wrote: Wed 17 Jul 2019 11:28pm
Furphy wrote: Wed 17 Jul 2019 11:08pm
tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: Wed 17 Jul 2019 1:00pm He'll be right. Not worth risking this year if not a 100%. Pointless and stupid. Fact is, we need a champion of the game with leadership skills for our young list. When he gets fully right, he is a class above the rest.
'A ship in the harbour is safe, but that's not what ships are built for' Old proverb
Great saying! Did I hear that in a movie or TV ad?
It was on a NAB TV ad about 4 years ago, but it's a very old saying


User avatar
Furphy
Club Player
Posts: 781
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005 2:48pm
Location: Berwick
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1807941Post Furphy »

tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: Wed 17 Jul 2019 10:02pm We are 1 year into 5 years. Quit the hysteria.
Not another '5 year plan', please. 40 years ago it kept critics quiet for 4 years, it doesn't fly now. At least the 'by 2019 we'll be a premiership contender' was a nice spin on an old fob


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30058
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 705 times
Been thanked: 1219 times

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1807988Post saintsRrising »

tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: Wed 17 Jul 2019 10:02pm We are 1 year into 5 years. Quit the hysteria.

What of? Scoops?


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
bigred
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11463
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 609 times

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1808000Post bigred »

Anyone else think we need to f*** Lethlean off?

Something about him is just not sitting right. I've bitched on these forums before about admin flogs that just repeatedly use our club as a springboard for their own agendas.

I don't really care about the Hana's money. Or Hana's fitness level in general. Would prefer to get more than two games a year out of him...but regardless.

Lethlean has an odour.


"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
User avatar
tedtheodorelogan2018
SS Life Member
Posts: 3022
Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2018 12:02am
Has thanked: 559 times
Been thanked: 452 times

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1808035Post tedtheodorelogan2018 »

Disagree. Lethers is good for the club. He has brought in a number of good appointments. E.g. the assistants last year

We need a bit of mongrel. Lethers looks like he wants to get s*** sorted at Moorabbin.


Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
User avatar
barks4eva
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10748
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:39pm
Has thanked: 190 times
Been thanked: 92 times

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1808042Post barks4eva »

bigred wrote: Thu 18 Jul 2019 11:11am Anyone else think we need to f*** Lethlean off?

Something about him is just not sitting right. I've bitched on these forums before about admin flogs that just repeatedly use our club as a springboard for their own agendas.
Lethlean has an odour.
ABSOLUTELY

He displays incredibly poor judgement and cheats on his wife, gets sacked from his AFL gig and then five minutes later he's shipped off to St.kilda and into a position he's never held before.

WHY?


DO THE MATHS AND THE SQUARES ARE ALL ROOTED.
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13290
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1288 times
Been thanked: 1979 times

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1808044Post The_Dud »

tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: Thu 18 Jul 2019 12:38pm Disagree. Lethers is good for the club. He has brought in a number of good appointments. E.g. the assistants last year

We need a bit of mongrel. Lethers looks like he wants to get s*** sorted at Moorabbin.
Isn’t giving out a bit of mongrel what got him in trouble in the first place? 🤔


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
tedtheodorelogan2018
SS Life Member
Posts: 3022
Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2018 12:02am
Has thanked: 559 times
Been thanked: 452 times

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1808046Post tedtheodorelogan2018 »

No idea Dudley. I'm not into Women's Day type gossip.


Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
ss1986
Club Player
Posts: 610
Joined: Mon 11 Sep 2017 5:32pm
Has thanked: 267 times
Been thanked: 177 times

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1808051Post ss1986 »

You should all be banned for demeaning a Saints official!


User avatar
samoht
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5740
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
Has thanked: 581 times
Been thanked: 433 times
Contact:

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1808054Post samoht »

There are two things that are infinite and definite ... the universe and St Kilda’s capacity to make stupid recruiting decisions.


Toy Saint
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2203
Joined: Wed 19 Aug 2009 10:32pm
Location: Del Mar, California
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1808084Post Toy Saint »

barks4eva wrote: Thu 18 Jul 2019 12:44pm
bigred wrote: Thu 18 Jul 2019 11:11am Anyone else think we need to f*** Lethlean off?

Something about him is just not sitting right. I've bitched on these forums before about admin flogs that just repeatedly use our club as a springboard for their own agendas.
Lethlean has an odour.
ABSOLUTELY

He displays incredibly poor judgement and cheats on his wife, gets sacked from his AFL gig and then five minutes later he's shipped off to St.kilda and into a position he's never held before.

WHY?

St Kilda has been reemed by the AFL for several years, back in the day Grant Thomas would fight with them, but I feel Lethlean is actually an 'AFL plant' to ensure St Kilda tows the company line. Get rid of him, he's probably a traitor.


Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11293
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1288 times
Been thanked: 435 times

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1808088Post Sainternist »

It wasn’t like we didn’t see this coming. The warning signs were there right from the start: a broken body and a penchant for Wizz Fizz.

We were being laughed at for instigating this trade for a reason. It was always going to be a huge gamble. If Hannebery had any dignity, he’d take a pay cut.


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16573
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3457 times
Been thanked: 2723 times

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1808107Post skeptic »

tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: Thu 18 Jul 2019 12:38pm Disagree. Lethers is good for the club. He has brought in a number of good appointments. E.g. the assistants last year

We need a bit of mongrel. Lethers looks like he wants to get s*** sorted at Moorabbin.
One thing that has been immensely painful over the last 18mths... Moreover here on this forum rather than at the club per’se is the constant attempts to put a positive spin onto what are clearly bad decisions and outcomes.

Hannebery is a great example of it.

Brought in to essentially be our best mid and a leader. One of the highest paid at the club and was pricey in terms of cost.

Almost 12 months in and he’s booted from the leadership group, and has missed all but 2 games of the season with the injury that all knew about and were concerned would derail the rest of his career... that I should confirm, we as a club have admitted was worse than we thought.

On every measurable level, the decision to recruit him for what we gave up was clearly a bad one.

Not to say that Dan can’t get better and still be a good player for us or even represent good value... but it’s clear that the basis for that outcome was not formed by our due diligence... it’s on hope and prayer that it’s okay.

I for one and sick to death of “hoping” things work out instead doing the due diligence and making informed decisions to help maximise the chances of getting the results we want.

We hoped that 2018 was an aberration
We hoped that Kent would be the outside mid that we wanted
We hoped that Hannebery would be ok
We hoped that 2019 we’d recover and play finals... that Richo was a better coach than we were seeing

On and on it went


User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12734
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 452 times
Been thanked: 1760 times

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1808111Post The Fireman »

skeptic wrote: Thu 18 Jul 2019 4:43pm
tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: Thu 18 Jul 2019 12:38pm Disagree. Lethers is good for the club. He has brought in a number of good appointments. E.g. the assistants last year

We need a bit of mongrel. Lethers looks like he wants to get s*** sorted at Moorabbin.
One thing that has been immensely painful over the last 18mths... Moreover here on this forum rather than at the club per’se is the constant attempts to put a positive spin onto what are clearly bad decisions and outcomes.

Hannebery is a great example of it.

Brought in to essentially be our best mid and a leader. One of the highest paid at the club and was pricey in terms of cost.

Almost 12 months in and he’s booted from the leadership group, and has missed all but 2 games of the season with the injury that all knew about and were concerned would derail the rest of his career... that I should confirm, we as a club have admitted was worse than we thought.

On every measurable level, the decision to recruit him for what we gave up was clearly a bad one.

Not to say that Dan can’t get better and still be a good player for us or even represent good value... but it’s clear that the basis for that outcome was not formed by our due diligence... it’s on hope and prayer that it’s okay.

I for one and sick to death of “hoping” things work out instead doing the due diligence and making informed decisions to help maximise the chances of getting the results we want.

We hoped that 2018 was an aberration
We hoped that Kent would be the outside mid that we wanted
We hoped that Hannebery would be ok
We hoped that 2019 we’d recover and play finals... that Richo was a better coach than we were seeing

On and on it went
It's annoying everyone on here , it's tantamount to trolling.


Josh Battle
Club Player
Posts: 456
Joined: Sun 19 May 2019 7:49pm
Has thanked: 236 times
Been thanked: 129 times

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1808124Post Josh Battle »

You guys are being ridiculous and you are jealous of supporters who are uber positive

We are at the top of players lists for clubs to come to if you want to live in Melbourne

We are still a mathematical chance to make the 8

Hannas is still a valuable leader at our club and he could lead St Kilda as our captain when we win our second premiership

Bookmark it


gone fission
Club Player
Posts: 67
Joined: Sun 10 Apr 2016 4:14pm
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1808144Post gone fission »

Astute.


SAINT-LEE
Club Player
Posts: 1126
Joined: Fri 22 Mar 2019 10:46pm
Has thanked: 499 times
Been thanked: 365 times

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1808161Post SAINT-LEE »

ss1986 wrote: Thu 18 Jul 2019 1:06pm You should all be banned for demeaning a Saints official!
Can't be demeaning if it's true.

The man had an ongoing affair with an employee.
Then after being caught ( it's a fact he was caught AT WORK) and "resigning", he publically stated he was going to take a long break and focus on what mattered most....rebuilding his family. 4 and a bit months later he was hired at St Kilda....some kind of goddamn marriage rebuilding guru!!!!

I think as a newly appointed person to the role, he was under immense pressure ( no excuse). His affair began in September 2016 through the first week of April 2017 ( documented by several journalist with no denials).
He lied and said it was a very short, " few weeks" affair.
He only resigned the day AFTER Caroline Wilson named him and the woman he had an affair with in an article July 2017.

He made a mega speech about integrity and blah blah blah.
All things he didn't display.

Now we hired him to bring that integrity here.

I was against it 100%, not because people make mistakes but because he had a long term affair with a person under him at work and didn't show integrity until he was publically named. Red flags galore!!!

But he did what he was told, step down, be a good lad and he would get another appointment.

Now we have him. Can't go back. So I chose to let go of the past.

I won't trust him until I see him acting trustworthy. So far not so good with Hanner Scam.


User avatar
tedtheodorelogan2018
SS Life Member
Posts: 3022
Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2018 12:02am
Has thanked: 559 times
Been thanked: 452 times

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1808241Post tedtheodorelogan2018 »

skeptic wrote: Thu 18 Jul 2019 4:43pm
tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: Thu 18 Jul 2019 12:38pm Disagree. Lethers is good for the club. He has brought in a number of good appointments. E.g. the assistants last year

We need a bit of mongrel. Lethers looks like he wants to get s*** sorted at Moorabbin.
One thing that has been immensely painful over the last 18mths... Moreover here on this forum rather than at the club per’se is the constant attempts to put a positive spin onto what are clearly bad decisions and outcomes.

Hannebery is a great example of it.

Brought in to essentially be our best mid and a leader. One of the highest paid at the club and was pricey in terms of cost.

Almost 12 months in and he’s booted from the leadership group, and has missed all but 2 games of the season with the injury that all knew about and were concerned would derail the rest of his career... that I should confirm, we as a club have admitted was worse than we thought.

On every measurable level, the decision to recruit him for what we gave up was clearly a bad one.

Not to say that Dan can’t get better and still be a good player for us or even represent good value... but it’s clear that the basis for that outcome was not formed by our due diligence... it’s on hope and prayer that it’s okay.

I for one and sick to death of “hoping” things work out instead doing the due diligence and making informed decisions to help maximise the chances of getting the results we want.

We hoped that 2018 was an aberration
We hoped that Kent would be the outside mid that we wanted
We hoped that Hannebery would be ok
We hoped that 2019 we’d recover and play finals... that Richo was a better coach than we were seeing

On and on it went
Great waffle.

Don't read anything positive then. Stay in a cycle of doom and gloom. It's much easier.


Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16573
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3457 times
Been thanked: 2723 times

Re: Hannebury - Indefinite

Post: # 1808264Post skeptic »

tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: Thu 18 Jul 2019 9:16pm
skeptic wrote: Thu 18 Jul 2019 4:43pm
tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: Thu 18 Jul 2019 12:38pm Disagree. Lethers is good for the club. He has brought in a number of good appointments. E.g. the assistants last year

We need a bit of mongrel. Lethers looks like he wants to get s*** sorted at Moorabbin.
One thing that has been immensely painful over the last 18mths... Moreover here on this forum rather than at the club per’se is the constant attempts to put a positive spin onto what are clearly bad decisions and outcomes.

Hannebery is a great example of it.

Brought in to essentially be our best mid and a leader. One of the highest paid at the club and was pricey in terms of cost.

Almost 12 months in and he’s booted from the leadership group, and has missed all but 2 games of the season with the injury that all knew about and were concerned would derail the rest of his career... that I should confirm, we as a club have admitted was worse than we thought.

On every measurable level, the decision to recruit him for what we gave up was clearly a bad one.

Not to say that Dan can’t get better and still be a good player for us or even represent good value... but it’s clear that the basis for that outcome was not formed by our due diligence... it’s on hope and prayer that it’s okay.

I for one and sick to death of “hoping” things work out instead doing the due diligence and making informed decisions to help maximise the chances of getting the results we want.

We hoped that 2018 was an aberration
We hoped that Kent would be the outside mid that we wanted
We hoped that Hannebery would be ok
We hoped that 2019 we’d recover and play finals... that Richo was a better coach than we were seeing

On and on it went
Great waffle.

Don't read anything positive then. Stay in a cycle of doom and gloom. It's much easier.
The easiest thing is lying to yourself rather than confronting reality.
You were the guy that predicted we’d bounce back this year and play finals... comforting thoughts for you I guess


Post Reply