Changes v Hawks

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Kernal75
Club Player
Posts: 318
Joined: Wed 16 Nov 2011 2:21pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1554033Post Kernal75 »

I don't understand all the love for Lee. The guy is undersized for KPD and too light. On top of that he's been a defender for a month. He's learning his craft as much as Goodard is. At least Goddard has the size and weight to play on the Hawks FWD's if required. IMO Lee's best shot at a long term position in defence is taking over from Fisher when he gives it away. No harm in him having to grind away in the 2's this year with a view to having a real crack next year in defence. FWIW I think Roberton will get the job on Gunston.


User avatar
mad saint guy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7025
Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 49 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1554037Post mad saint guy »

Kernal75 wrote:I don't understand all the love for Lee. The guy is undersized for KPD and too light. On top of that he's been a defender for a month. He's learning his craft as much as Goodard is.
Lee is a cm taller than Roo. Other than our rucks, only White, Bruce and Goddard are taller. He's had at least one full year of state level footy as a key defender as well. I'm very surprised that we haven't given him a crack this week. He deserves it on form and we could really use some decent ball use coming out of defence with Fisher out.


FQF
SS Life Member
Posts: 2595
Joined: Fri 03 Jul 2009 1:24am

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1554038Post FQF »

SainterK wrote:Wouldn't surprise me if we don't bring in height, why now?

A lot of hand wringing over Lee that I don't get personally.
Why now? Because Hawthorn have two elite key forwards (Roughead and Gunston) and Hale who can be very effective as a third. We have one (one!) bona fide key back (Delaney). Goddard would have be close to a certainty to play on Hale and then good luck controlling Gunston with Dempster/Webster/Roberton.


terry smith rules
SS Life Member
Posts: 2500
Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005 1:27pm
Location: Abiding
Has thanked: 168 times
Been thanked: 361 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1554039Post terry smith rules »

FQF wrote:
SainterK wrote:Wouldn't surprise me if we don't bring in height, why now?

A lot of hand wringing over Lee that I don't get personally.
Why now? Because Hawthorn have two elite key forwards (Roughead and Gunston) and Hale who can be very effective as a third. We have one (one!) bona fide key back (Delaney). Goddard would have be close to a certainty to play on Hale and then good luck controlling Gunston with Dempster/Webster/Roberton.
Um Gunston is 193 and 94 and Roberton is 194 and 88, would have thought a perfect match up


" A few will never give up on you. When you go back out on the field, those are the people I want in your minds. Those are the people I want in your hearts."

— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
FQF
SS Life Member
Posts: 2595
Joined: Fri 03 Jul 2009 1:24am

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1554042Post FQF »

terry smith rules wrote:
FQF wrote:
SainterK wrote:Wouldn't surprise me if we don't bring in height, why now?

A lot of hand wringing over Lee that I don't get personally.
Why now? Because Hawthorn have two elite key forwards (Roughead and Gunston) and Hale who can be very effective as a third. We have one (one!) bona fide key back (Delaney). Goddard would have be close to a certainty to play on Hale and then good luck controlling Gunston with Dempster/Webster/Roberton.
Um Gunston is 193 and 94 and Roberton is 194 and 88, would have thought a perfect match up
It might work, but perfect?

First, that is a 6 kg advantage to Gunston. Second, when does Roberton ever play on KPF? He plays small and is more like an oversized flanker. Gunston plays tall (and small- which is why he's good).


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1554044Post plugger66 »

FQF wrote:
terry smith rules wrote:
FQF wrote:
SainterK wrote:Wouldn't surprise me if we don't bring in height, why now?

A lot of hand wringing over Lee that I don't get personally.
Why now? Because Hawthorn have two elite key forwards (Roughead and Gunston) and Hale who can be very effective as a third. We have one (one!) bona fide key back (Delaney). Goddard would have be close to a certainty to play on Hale and then good luck controlling Gunston with Dempster/Webster/Roberton.
Um Gunston is 193 and 94 and Roberton is 194 and 88, would have thought a perfect match up
It might work, but perfect?

First, that is a 6 kg advantage to Gunston. Second, when does Roberton ever play on KPF? He plays small and is more like an oversized flanker. Gunston plays tall (and small- which is why he's good).

Lets be totally honest about this. The game will be won in the midfield. If there outside runners play well then it matters little who is on their forwards. We need to win in the midfield to be a chance. Im more worried about a guy like Smith who can really run.


FQF
SS Life Member
Posts: 2595
Joined: Fri 03 Jul 2009 1:24am

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1554045Post FQF »

plugger66 wrote:
FQF wrote:
terry smith rules wrote:
FQF wrote:
SainterK wrote:Wouldn't surprise me if we don't bring in height, why now?

A lot of hand wringing over Lee that I don't get personally.
Why now? Because Hawthorn have two elite key forwards (Roughead and Gunston) and Hale who can be very effective as a third. We have one (one!) bona fide key back (Delaney). Goddard would have be close to a certainty to play on Hale and then good luck controlling Gunston with Dempster/Webster/Roberton.
Um Gunston is 193 and 94 and Roberton is 194 and 88, would have thought a perfect match up
It might work, but perfect?

First, that is a 6 kg advantage to Gunston. Second, when does Roberton ever play on KPF? He plays small and is more like an oversized flanker. Gunston plays tall (and small- which is why he's good).

Lets be totally honest about this. The game will be won in the midfield. If there outside runners play well then it matters little who is on their forwards. We need to win in the midfield to be a chance. Im more worried about a guy like Smith who can really run.
Not sure anyone here would argue about that. But it's irrelevant. We still need to get the match ups right and its an interesting discussion.


terry smith rules
SS Life Member
Posts: 2500
Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005 1:27pm
Location: Abiding
Has thanked: 168 times
Been thanked: 361 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1554049Post terry smith rules »

FQF wrote:
SainterK wrote:Wouldn't surprise me if we don't bring in height, why now?

A lot of hand wringing over Lee that I don't get personally.
Why now? Because Hawthorn have two elite key forwards (Roughead and Gunston) and Hale who can be very effective as a third. We have one (one!) bona fide key back (Delaney). Goddard would have be close to a certainty to play on Hale and then good luck controlling Gunston with Dempster/Webster/Roberton.
Um Gunston is 193 and 94 and Roberton is 194 and 88, would have thought a perfect match up


" A few will never give up on you. When you go back out on the field, those are the people I want in your minds. Those are the people I want in your hearts."

— Coach Eric Taylor - Friday Night Lights
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1554061Post Con Gorozidis »

Kernal75 wrote:I don't understand all the love for Lee. The guy is undersized for KPD and too light. On top of that he's been a defender for a month. He's learning his craft as much as Goodard is. At least Goddard has the size and weight to play on the Hawks FWD's if required. IMO Lee's best shot at a long term position in defence is taking over from Fisher when he gives it away. No harm in him having to grind away in the 2's this year with a view to having a real crack next year in defence. FWIW I think Roberton will get the job on Gunston.
Dunno if it is love for Lee but recognition of good VFL form for the season in a new position. He is 194cm. Taller than Ted Richards and Luke McPharlin. Im not sure he is undersized. He is good in the air and can kick it. But agree his best shot is as a replacement for Dempster/Fisher.


User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8572
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 525 times
Been thanked: 1523 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1554068Post kosifantutti »

@AFL_PKeane: St K v Haw;
Int; Savage, Ross, Roberton, Sinclair.
Emerg; Curren, Goddard, Minchington.
Ray, Savage, Ross in for Weller, Dunstan, McKenzie.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1554070Post Con Gorozidis »

kosifantutti wrote:@AFL_PKeane: St K v Haw;
Int; Savage, Ross, Roberton, Sinclair.
Emerg; Curren, Goddard, Minchington.
Ray, Savage, Ross in for Weller, Dunstan, McKenzie.
Like for like changes. Cant really argue. The coach is clearly a big fan of Ross, and Ray and Savage provide some added run.
Roberton will be asked to play a more defensive role you would reckon. I also much refer Gears playing a purely defensive role (like last week) and leave the kicking to Webster and Savage who can look for Roo for the transition. Seems like a balanced side.
Last edited by Con Gorozidis on Fri 05 Jun 2015 6:22pm, edited 1 time in total.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1554071Post plugger66 »

Con Gorozidis wrote:
kosifantutti wrote:@AFL_PKeane: St K v Haw;
Int; Savage, Ross, Roberton, Sinclair.
Emerg; Curren, Goddard, Minchington.
Ray, Savage, Ross in for Weller, Dunstan, McKenzie.
Like for like changes. Cant really argue. The coach is clearly a big fan of Ross and Ray and Savage provide some run.
Roberton will be asked to play a more defensive role you would reckon. I also much refer Gears playing a purely defensive role (like last week) and leave the kicking to Webster and Savage. Seems like a balanced side.

Agree. The only way you beat the Hawks is with run.


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1554076Post saintspremiers »

Happy Goddard has been protected against the might of the Hawks and not selected.


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
realdeal
Club Player
Posts: 843
Joined: Tue 30 Mar 2004 5:44pm
Has thanked: 92 times
Been thanked: 115 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1554080Post realdeal »

So the key defensive match ups are what exactly?

Has Dempster grown 12cm and 15kg in the past week?

Lions didn't really have any tall forwards so replacing Fisher wasn't as important but this week is a different story. Yes we want run but the ball will only have to be kicked in the vicinity of their tall forwards for them to use their height advantage.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1554084Post Con Gorozidis »

realdeal wrote:So the key defensive match ups are what exactly?

Has Dempster grown 12cm and 15kg in the past week?

Lions didn't really have any tall forwards so replacing Fisher wasn't as important but this week is a different story. Yes we want run but the ball will only have to be kicked in the vicinity of their tall forwards for them to use their height advantage.
'Team defence' will be the motto.

Breust - Shenton/Webster?
Roughie - Delaney
Gunston - Roberton/Dempster?
Cyril - Geary/Savage?

Maybe even play someone defensive (Ray?) on Smith as well.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22562
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8519 times
Been thanked: 3751 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1554086Post saynta »

kosifantutti wrote:@AFL_PKeane: St K v Haw;
Int; Savage, Ross, Roberton, Sinclair.
Emerg; Curren, Goddard, Minchington.
Ray, Savage, Ross in for Weller, Dunstan, McKenzie.
I always knew that Ross would be one of the ins.

He would always get a game before Curran


realdeal
Club Player
Posts: 843
Joined: Tue 30 Mar 2004 5:44pm
Has thanked: 92 times
Been thanked: 115 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1554087Post realdeal »

FF Hale- ?


Saint wagga
Club Player
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sat 27 Apr 2013 7:44pm
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1554088Post Saint wagga »

Surprised ray and Ross comes in before curren or Minchi...not exactly solid with the whole rewarding vfl form line, but that's the biggest throwaway line in the coaching caper. I'm not unhappy with Ross coming in, just think he may have benefitted from another 2 weeks in the vfl before having a really good crack at the 2nd half of the season. He has come back well and I hope the coaches have made an excellent call.

Savage is an interesting one, sounds as if he was almost rested from the lions game, because how else does he come back in on vfl form? Again, I don't the call, thought he was stiff to be left out against the lions, but the public logic of the decisions don't always add up...guess that's what we get for being in the outer.


Richter
SS Life Member
Posts: 3914
Joined: Wed 30 Nov 2005 1:18pm
Location: Elwood

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1554089Post Richter »

Seems ok for mine. Only extra I would have done would have been Lee for Shenton. Lee might not cope with one of their Talls but IMO would have been worth a shot. Anyhow, presumably Savage has served his penalty for whatever off-field misdemeanour he committed, so glad he is back. I'm also chomping to see how Seb is with another pre-season under his belt. Ray - good solid citizen.


Hird... The unflushable one is now... just a turd...
Bunk_Moreland
SS Life Member
Posts: 3602
Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1554096Post Bunk_Moreland »

realdeal wrote:FF Hale- ?
Omitted - as per SEN


You are garbage - Enough said
Bunk_Moreland
SS Life Member
Posts: 3602
Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Changes v Hawks

Post: # 1554097Post Bunk_Moreland »

Richter wrote:Seems ok for mine. Only extra I would have done would have been Lee for Shenton. Lee might not cope with one of their Talls but IMO would have been worth a shot. Anyhow, presumably Savage has served his penalty for whatever off-field misdemeanour he committed, so glad he is back. I'm also chomping to see how Seb is with another pre-season under his belt. Ray - good solid citizen.
Think whatever benefit Ross got from a preseason has been lost with the terrible injury he has recovered from.

Maybe best to have a look in 2016 to judge if he has an injury free pre season


You are garbage - Enough said
Post Reply