Hickey, Bruce and Hind

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10634
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3315 times
Been thanked: 2287 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1911440Post Scollop »

desertsaint wrote: Wed 30 Jun 2021 4:02pm is hind having a better season than sinclair. possibly. but not much in it.
haven't seen enough of him to base it on any more than a few games and their comparative stats for the season.
https://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_ ... 1=S&fid2=S
Thanks for the footywire link

I just did a comparison between Hind and Hill…just for shitsandgiggles

https://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_ ... 1=S&fid2=S

Hmmm…interesting that Hind is apparently worth $607,000 for AFL Fantasy and Hill is worth just $465,000

Does that mean we got screwed?


User avatar
shanegrambeau
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5958
Joined: Thu 25 Jan 2018 2:15pm
Has thanked: 327 times
Been thanked: 710 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1911442Post shanegrambeau »

I wonder what sort of values Rioli senior (Hawthorn) Sean Burgoyne and other low possession but impactful players got on the kind of metrics those fantasy games use?


You're quite brilliant Shane, yeah..terrific!
User avatar
desertsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10344
Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
Location: out there
Has thanked: 183 times
Been thanked: 688 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1911473Post desertsaint »

pretty sure scollop was very much to gue in cheek, but yes, i'd ignore the fantasy ratings and values and just concentrate on the game stats. even they are open to some debate, but at least its a more objective measure.


"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10634
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3315 times
Been thanked: 2287 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1912500Post Scollop »

desertsaint wrote: Thu 01 Jul 2021 9:48pm pretty sure scollop was very much to gue in cheek, but yes, i'd ignore the fantasy ratings and values and just concentrate on the game stats. even they are open to some debate, but at least its a more objective measure.
I was going to let this thread die, but after watching Foxfooty, it’s time to revive the discussion and re-examine a genuine comparison of Hill versus Hind in season 2021. It’s significant and pertinent in terms of where St Kilda has been playing Hill for the majority of this year.

I wonder whether people actually looked at the website to see the comparison between Hind and Hill (based on stats for the current season). Here’s the link again;

https://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/ft_ ... 1=S&fid2=S

On The Couch (Foxfooty) showed the top 5 kicks so far this year - where they get the footy inside 50 - and a mark is taken by their teammate. These were the best 5 kicks inside 50 starting with McLuggage who hits a target 36% of the time. Next was David Mundy at 33% followed by Tim Kelly at 32% and last was Jarrod Lyons (Brisbane) who went at 25%. The fourth spot was Nick Hind.

Hind hit a target and a teammate marked the footy inside 50 with 31% of Nick’s passes. That’s impressive! Hind is definitely going to be high up in Essendon’s Best and Fairest too

Last two years at St Kilda it was always Hind that was finding himself on the outer. You could see that this kid had an asset that was a weapon and somehow St Kilda couldn’t develop and nurture and utilise his speed and allow him to flourish. It’s disappointing and it highlights again with a guy like Dunny that we always had the asset there and we went and picked up Crouch even though we had a player with similar ability right under our nose

No doubt that when Geary is fit they’ll find a spot for him in the team. Seb Ross and Jack Billings somehow get slotted in ahead of others, even when there’s no perfect role for them to play. When Brad Hill had 2 or 3 stinkers the coach and Simon Lethlean came out and publicly declared that Hill was not going to be dropped.

The thing that coaches need to learn is that a team has to evolve and change and you can’t rely on the same players getting the job done each week if they’ve shown time and time again that they’re not up to it.

It annoys me that team selection is based on past history of a player or his reputation or his draft pick or his current salary.

I’d love for DMac and Long to cement their place in the side. Both are tough. Both have speed and both have unique assets that need to be utilised for St Kilda to get back into finals.


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16564
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3454 times
Been thanked: 2716 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1912518Post skeptic »

I don’t get it Scollop.

A fairly constant pattern of this football club over at least the last 10-12 years or so and pbly longer has been persisting with incredibly out of form, mediocre players for ages.
Phrases such as ‘he’s playing a role’, ‘guarding space’, ‘blocking’, ‘applies pressure’, ‘has good attack’, ‘has good leadership’ etc are and have been prevalent on this forum for what feels like an eternity.

I know because I’ve been complaining for years about the metrics that people use to rationalise performance that has nothing to do with what a player does on the field that actually effects the game.

McQualter in 2010
Schneider, Gwilt, Jones and Gilbert in later years
Weller
Newnes
Longer
Kent
Etc etc

At least 2 forumites have told me that I’ve been obsessive on the topic

All of them played mediocre game after mediocre game with the odd delight in the lead up to the end and most ahead of guys like a Hind that had good qualities but were horribly underdeveloped and inconsistent.

But why the fascination with Hill beyond the fact that he gets paid a lot. He’s clearly top 22 and churning out regular good to excellent performances even if he’s had patches of really bad form. He’s certainly surpassed all of those in terms of contribution in say their last 2-3 years on the list above whilst getting substantially more heat.
And the connection to Hind is odd to me to.

Hill didn’t keep Hind out of the time - the blunder clearly was made by the coaches who once again incorrectly identified how to best use a player and their overall quality.

It’s starting to feel like the perception on this forum is that everything is Hill’s fault. Heaven forbid he misses a tall target these days because every mistake gets highlighted to death


User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5758
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: M32
Has thanked: 789 times
Been thanked: 754 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1917455Post samuraisaint »

Tonight is proof positive we should have held on to all three of these guys.
All three.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5758
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: M32
Has thanked: 789 times
Been thanked: 754 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1919002Post samuraisaint »

Well, I am extremely happy to say - a second gamer outrucked him in the forward line tonight!!!!
And Marshall was no slouch either.
Looks like we kept the right ruckman after all :D
I love to be wrong sometimes!!!

Saints (93) win Lakeside Premiership by defeating the Swans (64)


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7777
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 204 times
Been thanked: 550 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1919008Post magnifisaint »

Hickey got smashed by Marshall.
Marshall was a beast tonight.


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5788 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1919012Post Ghost Like »

Yep, Hind is the only one we miss out of those 3 & that's only because we never played him off half back.


User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5758
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: M32
Has thanked: 789 times
Been thanked: 754 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1919017Post samuraisaint »

magnifisaint wrote: Sat 07 Aug 2021 11:37pm Hickey got smashed by Marshall.
Marshall was a beast tonight.
Sharman was great too.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9480
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 131 times
Been thanked: 1206 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1919028Post CURLY »

Ghost Like wrote: Sat 07 Aug 2021 11:40pm Yep, Hind is the only one we miss out of those 3 & that's only because we never played him off half back.
Do we though?

Sinclair was brilliant again

Webster smashed Paton another big scalp

Coffield smashed Heeney


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5788 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1919040Post Ghost Like »

CURLY wrote: Sat 07 Aug 2021 11:52pm
Ghost Like wrote: Sat 07 Aug 2021 11:40pm Yep, Hind is the only one we miss out of those 3 & that's only because we never played him off half back.
Do we though?

Sinclair was brilliant again

Webster smashed Paton another big scalp

Coffield smashed Heeney
Hind has had a great year, the equal of Sinclair's, better than Webster's & Coffield's. The other two, Hickey & Bruce should not even be thought about.

Better off putting Acres, Newnes, McEvoy's & Cripps' names there.


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9480
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 131 times
Been thanked: 1206 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1919041Post CURLY »

Ghost Like wrote: Sat 07 Aug 2021 11:58pm
CURLY wrote: Sat 07 Aug 2021 11:52pm
Ghost Like wrote: Sat 07 Aug 2021 11:40pm Yep, Hind is the only one we miss out of those 3 & that's only because we never played him off half back.
Do we though?

Sinclair was brilliant again

Webster smashed Paton another big scalp

Coffield smashed Heeney
Hind has had a great year, the equal of Sinclair's, better than Webster's & Coffield's. The other two, Hickey & Bruce should not even be thought about.

Better off putting Acres, Newnes, McEvoy's & Cripps' names there.

Webster has been far better than Hind.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5788 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1919050Post Ghost Like »

If you say so, I don't agree. Not a huge difference but Hind's run & dash tears zoning defence apart. He makes a slow midfield look quicker.


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9480
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 131 times
Been thanked: 1206 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1919059Post CURLY »

Ghost Like wrote: Sun 08 Aug 2021 12:11am If you say so, I don't agree. Not a huge difference but Hind's run & dash tears zoning defence apart. He makes a slow midfield look quicker.
Webster playing on Martin Papley Cameron and so on. Hasn’t been beaten.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11150
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2447 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1919078Post B.M »

Hind doesn’t play Webster’s role

He plays as a running back, like Hill and Sinclair


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9480
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 131 times
Been thanked: 1206 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1919080Post CURLY »

B.M wrote: Sun 08 Aug 2021 1:01am Hind doesn’t play Webster’s role

He plays as a running back, like Hill and Sinclair
Well we have Hill and Sinclair


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8572
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 525 times
Been thanked: 1523 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1919122Post kosifantutti »

Hickey was instrumental in Swans getting it out of the centre last night. Marshall beat him around the ground.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5758
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: M32
Has thanked: 789 times
Been thanked: 754 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1919219Post samuraisaint »

kosifantutti wrote: Sun 08 Aug 2021 9:32am Hickey was instrumental in Swans getting it out of the centre last night. Marshall beat him around the ground.
Marshall 8 clearances - not bad
25 disposals
29 hit outs

Definitely beat him around the ground.

How many hit outs did Sharman get in ruck contests in the forward line?


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5788 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1919221Post Ghost Like »

Marshall is the mobile, marking half of our ruck. Paddy is the one we need in the centre bounces, especially now the AFL have their very own netball rule in place.

I really hope Max Heath has a thirst for knowledge, tactics and inspiration whilst he's lucky enough to have Ryder at training.


Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10634
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3315 times
Been thanked: 2287 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1919264Post Scollop »

kosifantutti wrote: Sun 08 Aug 2021 9:32am Hickey was instrumental in Swans getting it out of the centre last night. Marshall beat him around the ground.
Agreed

Haven’t looked at the stats but RoMa would have probably doubled Tom’s contested possessions

Marshall was also crucial at times for us to take control in the back half with his contested marks


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11150
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2447 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1919281Post B.M »

Can’t teach what Ryder can do in the centre square ruck contest

It’s innate, having deft touch is down to pure talent - otherwise every ruckman could do it

It’s like teaching someone to pitch in golf

They can learn the mechanics but distance control is a feel thing and can’t be taught


User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5788 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1919306Post Ghost Like »

B.M wrote: Sun 08 Aug 2021 6:49pm Can’t teach what Ryder can do in the centre square ruck contest

It’s innate, having deft touch is down to pure talent - otherwise every ruckman could do it

It’s like teaching someone to pitch in golf

They can learn the mechanics but distance control is a feel thing and can’t be taught
Try a different analogy, you can teach a person to chip. In fact you can teach someone many different ways to chip. Feel comes from practice and understanding of the many different variables that can come into play with each chip.

What Paddy cannot teach, which is a god given talent, is his sublime leap. Body positioning, using your strength and understanding the oppositions strength as well as working with a midfield can be lessons learned.

Who would you rather he spend time with, Paddy Ryder or Hunter?


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22562
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8520 times
Been thanked: 3751 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1919317Post saynta »

Bruce, suspected ruptured ACL.


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11150
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2447 times

Re: Hickey, Bruce and Hind

Post: # 1919318Post B.M »

Ghost

I know people who have played for 20 years and are single figures and can’t pitch.

Pitching and chipping action can be taught (as I alluded to)

Distance control cannot be taught - that is straight from the head coach at MGA.

But hey

You’d know better than him


Post Reply