Injured Medhurst likely to miss - The Age

[kosifantutti23]

I found this really confusing:

Jack (Anthony) is a big loss, he's been in pretty good form this year, but also Anthony comes into the side," Collingwood on-baller Shane O'Bree said.

until I realised he was talking about Anthony Rocca.

But then this couldn't be right could it?

"He might not be getting as many possessions as what he'd like, (but) he always creates a contest — he's good against St Kilda.

I suppose it depends how you define "good". IMHO for a key forward, one goal against a team since 2004 would be "not good". A total of 15 goals in 14 games, his worst ratio against any other club would also be "not good".

[undecided]

This seems so have nothing to do with Medhurst

[kosifantutti23]

This seems so have nothing to do with Medhurst

It would help if I put the link in

http://www.realfooty.com.au/articles/20 ... 50151.html

[borderbarry]

Our journo's are getting worse and worse. In both The Age and the Hun there is an article on "Medhurst may miss", both articles mention that Collingwood have taken the unusual step of retaining two of their three emergencies so it appearls likely that a player will miss (Medhurst). Neither journo was astute enough to mention that St.Kilda has done the same. So who have we got in doubt, is it Sam Fisher?