Sponsors Prize Question

[GrumpyOne]

[quote="St Fidelius"][quote="Richterâ€

[St Fidelius]

Here's a clue GrumpyOne...

Learn how to quote

AND

STOP STALKING ME!

[GrumpyOne]

Here's a clue GrumpyOne...

Learn how to quote

AND

STOP STALKING ME!

Mate....... You wouldn't know a clue if it bit you on the bum.

[sunsaint]

STALKING?
why is it that some posters claim stalking when you disagree wth them?
sRr has nothing to defend himself for, as 99.998% of people knew exactly what was meant. Small wonder no one sticks their hand up to help in these matters.
If you want to take it further stfid, send off a flurry of pm's to your friends, and write to Archie.

[saintsRrising]

Win its first Day Premiership (Grand Final)?

Was it 1940 when we won the first Patriotic Premiership, in a one day carnival when we beat Richmond by 24 points?[/quote]

PM from St Fid:
I did suggest to n1ck in a PM, right after my first post in that thread, that I am not interested in winning as it is only two tickets and we are a family of three

As per the Terms & Conditions sponsors were requested to only enter if they 100% could attend.....which was the WHOLE point of this exercise!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ie to get sponsrs that could attend

St Fid has therefore breeched the rules in addition to posting an incorrect answer.

[St Fidelius]

PM from St Fid:
I did suggest to n1ck in a PM, right after my first post in that thread, that I am not interested in winning as it is only two tickets and we are a family of three

As per the Terms & Conditions sponsors were requested to only enter if they 100% could attend.....which was the WHOLE point of this exercise!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ie to get sponsrs that could attend

St Fid has therefore breeched the rules in addition to posting an incorrect answer.

And you would like to make that public...

You also mentioned in that PM that a former mod got the answer wrong...

Hence my first comment that the question was a LITTLE flawed

Why take offence with that??

Your pride has got in the way of a comment that the question was a LITTLE flawed and the mere fact that a previous mod got it wrong is testament to this.

Oh, and thanks for sharing, your pride has obviously got in the way of common sense.

Again, the question was a little flawed, so as you said to me...

SUCK IT UP!

[plugger66]

He said, she said who gives a stuff said.

[saintsRrising]

You also mentioned in that PM that a former mod got the answer wrong...

Hence my first comment that the question was a LITTLE flawed
Why take offence with that??

St Fid how could that be hence?

You made your assetion YESTERDAY...you PM-ed today suggesting that I run questions past a Mod first..

and I replied that a former Mod (ie Nick) has supplied a wrong answer. A fact which is addressed early in this thread.

St Fid all you are doing is digginga bigger whole for yourself.

Once again

However IF YOU CANNOT DEFINITELY ATTEND THE NIGHT DO NOT TRY AND WIN THE PRIZE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! So READ THE EVENT DETAILS BELOW CAREFULLY AND CHECK IN ADVANCE THAT YOU CAN MAKE IT!!!


.

Was a clear condition of entry. A condition according to your PM to me today that you were happen to ignore.

[saintsRrising]

Is it possible fora Mod to block St Fid from spamming me with PMs?


I will ignore any future PM's from him.

[St Fidelius]

Is it possible fora Mod to block St Fid from spamming me with PMs?


I will ignore any future PM's from him.

I tried to keep this out of the forum and you took that extra step,.

I will never respond to any of you PMs and there is no need to mention of blocking mine, because I will not send any.


I made the comment YESTERDAY that your question was a LITTLE flawed, hence why some got it wrong.

In your PM you never mentioned the name, all you stated was that AN EX MOD answered it incorrectly..

FFS

Get over your ego!

As per the Rules I am the sole judge of the validity of the answers and I have accepted the two winners.

Yes, your ego has again stepped in...

Just where is the validity of the question come from?

Got to love those 'rules'

You now resort to posting PMs in order to in some way justify the question and then post that I was ineligible, I could not give a rats if I was ineligible.....

The question was a little flawed,

Your answers to my posts were a little insulting, I have not got personal or insulting with you in this thread.

But this takes the cake, I have had enough of comments like this, and your inability to communicate this issue in a private forum.

As is your ability to be gracious....

I suggest you suck it up and move on.

FFS ...


The problem here is not the question, it is your unwillingness to accept that you were not the winner.

Again, get over your ego...

[GrumpyOne]

I think we have just found out what is a little flawed in this thread, and it is not SRR's question.