Nathan Burke or "me"

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Enrico_Misso
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11662
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
Has thanked: 315 times
Been thanked: 720 times

Nathan Burke or "me"

Post: # 455293Post Enrico_Misso »

"Send Nathan Burke or me the enclosed proxy".
"Give Nathan Burke or me your support".

Maybe this is a bit pedantic but when I went to school it was "Nathan Burke or I" or "Nathan Burke or myself".

"Nathan Burke or me" is what you would expect from an undereducated Collingwood or Port supporter, not a President of our club. :shock: :shock:


The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules. 
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
chook23
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7229
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:31am
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 135 times

Post: # 455296Post chook23 »

noted that yesterday

also in thread mentioned the obvious use of a club icon name........but thats politics


saint4life
To the top
SS Life Member
Posts: 3266
Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
Been thanked: 390 times

Post: # 455299Post To the top »

Send the form to Nathan Burke.

Send the form to me.

So it is "Send the form to Nathan Burke or me".

You can pick the Victorians!!!


User avatar
doggerel
Club Player
Posts: 444
Joined: Wed 06 Oct 2004 2:24pm
Has thanked: 5 times

Re: Nathan Burke or "me"

Post: # 455303Post doggerel »

Enrico_Misso wrote:"Send Nathan Burke or me the enclosed proxy".
"Give Nathan Burke or me your support".

Maybe this is a bit pedantic but when I went to school it was "Nathan Burke or I" or "Nathan Burke or myself".

"Nathan Burke or me" is what you would expect from an undereducated Collingwood or Port supporter, not a President of our club. :shock: :shock:
What school did you go to Enrico? Summer Heights High?

"Nathan Burke or me" is correct. "Nathan Burke or I" is not.


St Kilda Social Club member since 1996
User avatar
Enrico_Misso
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11662
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
Has thanked: 315 times
Been thanked: 720 times

Re: Nathan Burke or "me"

Post: # 455315Post Enrico_Misso »

doggerel wrote:
Enrico_Misso wrote:"Send Nathan Burke or me the enclosed proxy".
"Give Nathan Burke or me your support".

Maybe this is a bit pedantic but when I went to school it was "Nathan Burke or I" or "Nathan Burke or myself".

"Nathan Burke or me" is what you would expect from an undereducated Collingwood or Port supporter, not a President of our club. :shock: :shock:
What school did you go to Enrico? Summer Heights High?

"Nathan Burke or me" is correct. "Nathan Burke or I" is not.

A single mother from the Broady estate might say "Me partner an me".

Whereas the Queen would say "My husband and I".

We speak the Queen's English do we not ?


The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules. 
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
User avatar
cowboy18
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5795
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:05pm
Location: in my duffle coat
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Post: # 455316Post cowboy18 »

I think the me is part of the object for the verb so me is OK?


User avatar
Brewer
Club Player
Posts: 313
Joined: Sun 06 May 2007 1:52pm

Post: # 455324Post Brewer »

CORRECT:
Burkey and I went to the pub (= Burkey went to the pub and I went to the pub)
Support Burkey and me (= support Burkey and support me)

INCORRECT:
Burkey and me went to the pub (= Burkey went to the pub and me went to the pub)
Support Burkey and I (= support Burkey and support I).


The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts.
To the top
SS Life Member
Posts: 3266
Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
Been thanked: 390 times

Post: # 455325Post To the top »

Ah, a monarchist to boot!

Resorting to the Royal "I".

Or is that the Royal "wee"?

No doubt you have penned this whilst sitting down!

Now that would be productivity - with a capital "P".


User avatar
cowboy18
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5795
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:05pm
Location: in my duffle coat
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Post: # 455326Post cowboy18 »

Brewer wrote:CORRECT:
Burkey and I went to the pub (= Burkey went to the pub and I went to the pub)
Support Burkey and me (= support Burkey and support me)

INCORRECT:
Burkey and me went to the pub (= Burkey went to the pub and me went to the pub)
Support Burkey and I (= support Burkey and support I).
That's confusing - so did you go the pub with Burkey or not? :D


StSteven
Club Player
Posts: 1169
Joined: Wed 20 Sep 2006 6:55pm

Post: # 455328Post StSteven »

Nathan Burke is going to the movies.

I am going to the movies.

Nathan Burke and I are going to the movies BUT send the forms to Nathan Burke or me!


PS try to explain to a non english speaker the pronunciation of "ough" as in

cough
although
tough
thought
bough
Last edited by StSteven on Thu 13 Sep 2007 3:56pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12694
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 708 times
Been thanked: 398 times

Post: # 455329Post Mr Magic »

cowboy18 wrote:
Brewer wrote:CORRECT:
Burkey and I went to the pub (= Burkey went to the pub and I went to the pub)
Support Burkey and me (= support Burkey and support me)

INCORRECT:
Burkey and me went to the pub (= Burkey went to the pub and me went to the pub)
Support Burkey and I (= support Burkey and support I).
That's confusing - so did you go the pub with Burkey or not? :D
Oh Cowboy, you crack me up! :lol:

You can positively be relied on to always post something that is guaranteed to bring a smile.


User avatar
Brewer
Club Player
Posts: 313
Joined: Sun 06 May 2007 1:52pm

Post: # 455332Post Brewer »

cowboy18 wrote:
Brewer wrote:CORRECT:
Burkey and I went to the pub (= Burkey went to the pub and I went to the pub)
Support Burkey and me (= support Burkey and support me)

INCORRECT:
Burkey and me went to the pub (= Burkey went to the pub and me went to the pub)
Support Burkey and I (= support Burkey and support I).
That's confusing - so did you go the pub with Burkey or not? :D
How many times do I have to say this?

Burkey and I went to the pub, and now we need support. 8-)


The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts.
joffaboy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 20200
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:57pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Post: # 455344Post joffaboy »

StSteven wrote: cough
although
tough
thought
bough
Yoiu watched "I Love Lucy" last night didn't you? Ricky Riccardo was having all sorts of issues :D


Lance or James??

There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
User avatar
riccardo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6952
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:44am
Location: Jason Gram - Michael Tuck Medalist 2008

Post: # 455347Post riccardo »

I think any documents like this has to be in legal language, dosen't it?

Maybe its right from that stand point?


Image

Image
User avatar
Armoooo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7281
Joined: Sun 26 Nov 2006 2:28pm
Location: The Great South East
Contact:

Post: # 455378Post Armoooo »

Yea I was a bit confused by that aswell because "Nathan Burke or Me"
seems like the sort of thing you would have got told off for saying in primary school, but "Nathan Burke or I" also seems wrong, the only thing that I could think of that sounds right is "Nathan Burke or Myself"

Anyway it doesn't matter if it's right or wrong because either way Westaway's use of language is still better than Bedwell's...


ROBERT HARVEY A.K.A The Great Man, Banger, Harves, Ol' Man River...
384 games, 4 B&F's, 3 EJ Whitten Medals, St.Kilda Captain, 2 Time Brownlow Medalist, 8 Time All Australian, 2nd Highest Brownlow votes poller.... The greatest of ALL TIME!!
User avatar
Saint Bev
SS Life Member
Posts: 2939
Joined: Sun 11 Jul 2004 3:29pm
Location: Gold Coast

Post: # 455408Post Saint Bev »

Brewer wrote:
cowboy18 wrote:
Brewer wrote:CORRECT:
Burkey and I went to the pub (= Burkey went to the pub and I went to the pub)
Support Burkey and me (= support Burkey and support me)

INCORRECT:
Burkey and me went to the pub (= Burkey went to the pub and me went to the pub)
Support Burkey and I (= support Burkey and support I).
That's confusing - so did you go the pub with Burkey or not? :D
How many times do I have to say this?

Burkey and I went to the pub, and now we need support. 8-)
Burkey is no fun go to the pub with, he doesn't drink! :wink:


Qld Saints Supporter Group
User avatar
Brewer
Club Player
Posts: 313
Joined: Sun 06 May 2007 1:52pm

Post: # 455413Post Brewer »

Saint Bev wrote:
Burkey is no fun go to the pub with, he doesn't drink! :wink:
Sh*t - so who did I lend $50 to?


The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts.
User avatar
St Chris
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2153
Joined: Wed 05 Apr 2006 2:20pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 41 times

Post: # 455430Post St Chris »

Armoooo wrote:Yea I was a bit confused by that aswell because "Nathan Burke or Me"
seems like the sort of thing you would have got told off for saying in primary school, but "Nathan Burke or I" also seems wrong, the only thing that I could think of that sounds right is "Nathan Burke or Myself"

Anyway it doesn't matter if it's right or wrong because either way Westaway's use of language is still better than Bedwell's...
Reckon he should have used:

"...forms to Nathan Burke or to me"
or
"...forms to Nathan Burke or to myself"

Could have saved some precious thread space....


User avatar
Unforgiven
SS Life Member
Posts: 3258
Joined: Wed 23 Feb 2005 9:48pm
Location: Full Forward

Post: # 455456Post Unforgiven »

reguardless of weather it is gramatically correct or not, I disliked the way it was worded.


Carpe Diem
StSteven
Club Player
Posts: 1169
Joined: Wed 20 Sep 2006 6:55pm

Post: # 455461Post StSteven »

Saint Bev wrote:
Brewer wrote:
cowboy18 wrote:
Brewer wrote:CORRECT:
Burkey and I went to the pub (= Burkey went to the pub and I went to the pub)
Support Burkey and me (= support Burkey and support me)

INCORRECT:
Burkey and me went to the pub (= Burkey went to the pub and me went to the pub)
Support Burkey and I (= support Burkey and support I).
That's confusing - so did you go the pub with Burkey or not? :D
How many times do I have to say this?

Burkey and I went to the pub, and now we need support. 8-)
Burkey is no fun go to the pub with, he doesn't drink! :wink:

That's why we went to the movies.
:lol: :lol:


User avatar
n1ck
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9869
Joined: Sun 08 Aug 2004 2:28am
Location: Clarinda
Has thanked: 77 times
Been thanked: 82 times

Post: # 455602Post n1ck »

'Nathan Burke or me' is grammatically correct in that context.

To have said Nathan Burke or I would have been wrong, and unprofessional.


satchmo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6655
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
Location: Hotel Bastardos
Has thanked: 191 times
Been thanked: 166 times
Contact:

Post: # 455609Post satchmo »

Saint Corin wrote:reguardless of weather it is gramatically correct or not, I disliked the way it was worded.
Yeah, and the whether is a problem too for the gards... :wink:


*Allegedly.

Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.

You can't un-fry things.


Last Post
User avatar
saint patrick
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4338
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 5:20pm
Location: mt.martha

Re: Nathan Burke or "me"

Post: # 455634Post saint patrick »

Enrico_Misso wrote:
doggerel wrote:
Enrico_Misso wrote:"Send Nathan Burke or me the enclosed proxy".
"Give Nathan Burke or me your support".

Maybe this is a bit pedantic but when I went to school it was "Nathan Burke or I" or "Nathan Burke or myself".

"Nathan Burke or me" is what you would expect from an undereducated Collingwood or Port supporter, not a President of our club. :shock: :shock:
What school did you go to Enrico? Summer Heights High?

"Nathan Burke or me" is correct. "Nathan Burke or I" is not.

A single mother from the Broady estate might say "Me partner an me".

Whereas the Queen would say "My husband and I".

We speak the Queen's English do we not ?
Oh dearie me...yes this is a major issue...we can't have a mere commoner as president...especially someone who has made in good in trucking/transport...hardly Law or Medicine is it!!!!!

Give me a freaking break... :roll:


Never take a backward step even to gain momentum.....

'It's OK to have the capabilities and abilities, but you've got to get it done." Terry Daniher 05

"We have beauty in our captain and we have a true leader in our coach. Our time will come"
Thinline.Post 09 Grand final.
User avatar
Riewoldting
SS Life Member
Posts: 2883
Joined: Thu 05 May 2005 1:34am
Location: Perth WA

Post: # 455635Post Riewoldting »

riccardo wrote:I think any documents like this has to be in legal language, dosen't it?

Maybe its right from that stand point?
You think any documents like this have to be in legal language, don't they?

No, they don't. Clear and simple language is fine.

"Nathan Burke or me" makes zero difference in that respect, but is nevertheless correct English ("Nathan Burke or I" is incorrect).

My concern is paragraph 9.

'"Million dollar profits" sound great to the supporters, but where it has been achieved mainly by reducing costs rather than making more money; that we were bottom in 2006 in revenue in the AFL; that our revenue has hardly grown in the last few years, you realise it's not as good as it sounds.'

Omitted words, subject-verb confusion, fragmented sentences ... it's a farking dog's breakfast.

And what's with the multiple pixelated photographs of Nathan Burke (not to mention Bromberg and Klim)? Could they not have got their hands on a camera and taken a quick headshot of Burke in a shirt and tie?


Image
"To be or not to be" - William Shakespeare
"To be is to do" - Immanuel Kant
"Do be do be do" - Frank Sinatra
casey scorp
Club Player
Posts: 1617
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Nathan Burke or "me"

Post: # 455692Post casey scorp »

Enrico_Misso wrote:
Whereas the Queen would say "My husband and I".
Whereas the Queen would say "My husband and I...... will be supporting the St Kilda Footy First group..... and do not wish to receive any suggestions to do otherwise".


Post Reply