Max King 1 match suspension rough conduct

[terry smith rules]

Still worth the fight though...
Fight the fights that are worth fighting.


I seriously doubt that contact had the potential to cause injury and that's what we should be arguing.
It should have been assessed as low from the start...and we'd accept a fine.
[/quote]

Both very fair points

I hope you are right

[Teflon]

King was almost walking ffs
This “potential “ criteria is bs

[Otiman]

King was almost walking ffs
This “potential “ criteria is bs

They were running parallel to each other, it's nothing like the incidents where there is speed on the contact.

[Sainter_Dad]

King was almost walking ffs
This “potential “ criteria is bs

They were running parallel to each other, it's nothing like the incidents where there is speed on the contact.

Can we get a Bio-Mechanic to testify?

[MickThomas]

Is it tonight?

[Teflon]

King was almost walking ffs
This “potential “ criteria is bs

They were running parallel to each other, it's nothing like the incidents where there is speed on the contact.

Correct so “potential” needs to factor in context ffs

[Devilhead]

Draper's intentional cannon charge into Lloyds back had the potential to cause injury yet it was assessed as being low impact and the velocity of the hit was a lot higher

[WellardSaint]

Being heard now

[The Fireman]

[Teflon]

Upheld

[Teflon]

Pissweak tribunal
We’ll see worse acts than that get off this year

[Sainter_Dad]

Took a while to deliberate - ie 1 minute to say it's St Kilda Yeah - Nah - 25 minutes for Uber Eats to deliver. The were Deliver-Ating

[Teflon]

Ah well Caminiti ….time to take ure chance… he mightn’t get many

[CQ SAINT]

Its Hammertime.

[mickey]

I can't believe how bad our record is at the tribunal. For years I've been saying our lawyer is the guy out of The Castle.... I know he finally got a new photocopier but he's still useless !!!!! The vibe just doesn't work any more.

[Otiman]

Appeal?

[The Fireman]

I tipped this

[magnifisaint]

You can't bump anymore!

[CURLY]

Another kick in the guts from a corrupt incompetent administration. No injury to the play an incident which really is so low on the scale it’s barely a free.

Oh no it’s StKilda bend over

[The Fireman]

Do you think you may have a complex curly

[CURLY]

Do you think you may have a complex curly

Years of watching this ridiculous s***

[CURLY]

Do you think you may have a complex curly

Years of watching this ridiculous s***

[The Fireman]

Do you think you may have a complex curly

Years of watching this ridiculous s***

He was lucky to get one. I just hope he doesn’t turn into a wannabe tough guy like Tom Lynch.

[shrodes]

I can't believe how bad our record is at the tribunal. For years I've been saying our lawyer is the guy out of The Castle.... I know he finally got a new photocopier but he's still useless !!!!! The vibe just doesn't work any more.

Didn’t we get Butler and Caminiti suspensions overturned within the last year or so?

I’m fine with this decision tbh as long as they’re consistent.

From tonight’s verdict:
“Guidelines provide any high bump which constitutes rough conduct that has the potential to cause injury will usually be graded at a minimum ‘medium’ impact, even though the extent of the actual physical impact may be low.”

If they’re going to contest that any head high contact with potential to cause injury (regardless of outcome) and is avoidable through player action is a suspendable offense then that’s fine in my books, but it has to be applied to everyone evenly, including cases where it would rule out star players from finals and Brownlow.

[Teflon]

I can't believe how bad our record is at the tribunal. For years I've been saying our lawyer is the guy out of The Castle.... I know he finally got a new photocopier but he's still useless !!!!! The vibe just doesn't work any more.

Didn’t we get Butler and Caminiti suspensions overturned within the last year or so?

I’m fine with this decision tbh as long as they’re consistent.

From tonight’s verdict:
“Guidelines provide any high bump which constitutes rough conduct that has the potential to cause injury will usually be graded at a minimum ‘medium’ impact, even though the extent of the actual physical impact may be low.”

If they’re going to contest that any head high contact with potential to cause injury (regardless of outcome) and is avoidable through player action is a suspendable offense then that’s fine in my books, but it has to be applied to everyone evenly, including cases where it would rule out star players from finals and Brownlow.

But it won’t be….theres the issues
Tom Lynch whacks people doesn’t get cited
I could argue the Pies twit on Higgins in goal square was high with potential for injury
It’s Mickey mouse stuff