Paddr Ryder incident vis-a-vis Maynard

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Waltzing St Kilda
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2094
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2010 5:20am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 332 times

Paddr Ryder incident vis-a-vis Maynard

Post: # 2031025Post Waltzing St Kilda »

Check out the commentary surrounding last year's Paddy Ryder-Will Day incident compared to what we're getting from the same people re Maynard-Brayshaw. Unbelievable!



User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18477
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1512 times
Been thanked: 1865 times

Re: Paddr Ryder incident vis-a-vis wMaynard

Post: # 2031027Post SaintPav »

Unbelievable.

Robbo and Whateley are clueless morons. They change their opinion on reports as often as the wind changes direction.

From memory this went to the tribunal but it wasn’t challenged by the club?


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10906
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2402 times

Re: Paddr Ryder incident vis-a-vis Maynard

Post: # 2031029Post B.M »

Everything about that is wrong

Ryder got suspended because someone ran into him and concussed themselves. He basically just stood his ground!

McKay ran past the footy and smashed Hunter Clark’s face in

Not an issue though


saint6709
Club Player
Posts: 1415
Joined: Tue 22 Sep 2009 8:23am
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: Paddr Ryder incident vis-a-vis Maynard

Post: # 2031030Post saint6709 »

The 'footy act' bulls*** was clearly called into the rooms pretty well immediately from a pies lawyer and they've stuck with it ever since.

he was in the air with outstretched arms - and although not being able to control his trajectory he had full control of his arms, legs etc - unless a pies physicist can explain otherwise.

he could have chosen to leave his arms outstretched and met Brayshaws shoulders ( or there abouts) reasonably safely with outstretched hands.

But he decided - in mid air - yep the brain still functions in mid air - again unless a pies neurologist or some such can tell me otherwise - he decided to tuck his arms in and drop and point his shoulder and hit the guy in the face - he should get about 6 weeks - maybe more depending on Brayshaws return to the game


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10906
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2402 times

Re: Paddr Ryder incident vis-a-vis Maynard

Post: # 2031032Post B.M »

Barry Hall was a footy act, when he dropped Matt Maguire 100m off the ball!

Or was it a dog act?

Not sure 🤔


Rourke
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu 06 Jul 2017 4:47pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Paddr Ryder incident vis-a-vis Maynard

Post: # 2031035Post Rourke »

The Ryder suspension was manifestly unjust. Slowed to a literal stop, started to brace 5 frames (0.2 seconds) before Day blindly ran into him. Maynard arguably had more bracing time and more culpability, but he should still get off. Brayshaw shifts right after he kicks the ball and ends up in Maynard's direct path.

Once they acquit Maynard the Tribunal should give a public apology to Paddy. Media too


thejiggingsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9356
Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
Has thanked: 629 times
Been thanked: 473 times

Re: Paddr Ryder incident vis-a-vis wMaynard

Post: # 2031036Post thejiggingsaint »

SaintPav wrote: Tue 12 Sep 2023 7:16pm Unbelievable.

Robbo and Whateley are clueless morons. They change their opinion on reports as often as the wind changes direction.

From memory this went to the tribunal but it wasn’t challenged by the club?
I NEVER watch them, read their articles, listen to radio, in short: I NEVER patronise the media, it does absolutely phuck ALL to improve my enjoyment of watching my club play footy.


St Kilda forever 🔴⚪️⚫️ ( God help me)
Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10419
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3278 times
Been thanked: 2241 times

Re: Paddr Ryder incident vis-a-vis Maynard

Post: # 2031038Post Scollop »

Apparently Collingwood are also arguing that Brayshaw veered into Maynard's lane (this is what I'm hearing from my Pies friends).

They've highlighted purple and yellow lanes to show each player's movement and the Pies lawyers are saying that Brayshaw moved towards Maynard. He crossed lanes...

JFC. This isn't an Olympic track event ffs!!

Just another way of saying that it's Brayshaw's fault that he got concussion. Blame the victim.


User avatar
Sainter_Dad
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6042
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
Has thanked: 233 times
Been thanked: 1036 times

Re: Paddr Ryder incident vis-a-vis Maynard

Post: # 2031059Post Sainter_Dad »

Scollop wrote: Tue 12 Sep 2023 8:03pm Apparently Collingwood are also arguing that Brayshaw veered into Maynard's lane (this is what I'm hearing from my Pies friends).

They've highlighted purple and yellow lanes to show each player's movement and the Pies lawyers are saying that Brayshaw moved towards Maynard. He crossed lanes...

JFC. This isn't an Olympic track event ffs!!

Just another way of saying that it's Brayshaw's fault that he got concussion. Blame the victim.
Bradshaw took a half step to the right after kicking it - looking at it he would have been worse off if he maintained the line as he would have copped the shoulder straight in the face


“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”

― Aristophanes

If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
User avatar
Sainter_Dad
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6042
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
Has thanked: 233 times
Been thanked: 1036 times

Re: Paddr Ryder incident vis-a-vis wMaynard

Post: # 2031062Post Sainter_Dad »

SaintPav wrote: Tue 12 Sep 2023 7:16pm Unbelievable.

Robbo and Whateley are clueless morons. They change their opinion on reports as often as the wind changes direction.

From memory this went to the tribunal but it wasn’t challenged by the club?
The Ryder case was from a different era - bull tish result - but a different era


“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”

― Aristophanes

If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
User avatar
Templar
Club Player
Posts: 423
Joined: Mon 16 Aug 2004 11:03am
Has thanked: 252 times
Been thanked: 154 times

Re: Paddr Ryder incident vis-a-vis wMaynard

Post: # 2031072Post Templar »

Sainter_Dad wrote: Tue 12 Sep 2023 9:01pm The Ryder case was from a different era - bull tish result - but a different era
True. AFL is now a different game year after year. (Historical player records have also become meaningless.)


Not "Simon Templar". He was here first. Please change my username to Bumstead and if possible make me one of those very large sandwiches, thanks!
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13165
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1282 times
Been thanked: 1956 times

Re: Paddr Ryder incident vis-a-vis Maynard

Post: # 2031080Post The_Dud »

Probably time to move on…


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4453
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1252 times
Been thanked: 1289 times

Re: Paddr Ryder incident vis-a-vis Maynard

Post: # 2031102Post Yorkeys »

The_Dud wrote: Tue 12 Sep 2023 10:04pm Probably time to move on…
Yes. It's the sealed section of the offence matrix and not seeing it publicly that can cause confusion/frustration to us amateurs.
Two hidden columns. Club. Finals.
Clubs: some clubs are exempt from sanctions at the discretion of the ex Collingwood player or executive intervention. Others are to be caned mercilessly.
Finals: unless it's a clear elbow or punch to the opponent's head by a non Brownlow winner, it's a pass.


Post Reply