We are NOT That Good

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
BradWA
Club Player
Posts: 243
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 10:12pm
Been thanked: 4 times

We are NOT That Good

Post: # 2008849Post BradWA »

Players who are VFL std

Howard To Slow reacting.
Paton A deer in the headlights.
Butler One good game in 6 will never be good enough.

Just a few examples


A team will never evolve and win a FLAG for rewarding mediocrity


The Moderator Nazi,s strike again, Oh forgot, shyt im not in the purple circle.
User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5734
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: M32
Has thanked: 775 times
Been thanked: 747 times

Re: We are NOT That Good

Post: # 2009027Post samuraisaint »

No team could cover the players of the calibre we had out and have had out all season.

We have done very well considering. If we can beat the Giants, we'll beat Hawthorn, and then we will be in the run to the finals up to our necks.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8257
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 160 times
Been thanked: 549 times

Re: We are NOT That Good

Post: # 2009236Post Otiman »

We were alright the first 6 weeks. What changed?


Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11291
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1285 times
Been thanked: 433 times

Re: We are NOT That Good

Post: # 2009260Post Sainternist »

We never even fooled ourselves into thinking we were THAT good. What a depressing post. I think I’ll go and listen to some Nine Inch Nails to help me cheer up!


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
Trixilver
Club Player
Posts: 335
Joined: Sun 02 May 2010 6:24pm
Location: Adelaide, SA
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: We are NOT That Good

Post: # 2009282Post Trixilver »

Sainternist wrote: Thu 18 May 2023 8:38pm We never even fooled ourselves into thinking we were THAT good. What a depressing post. I think I’ll go and listen to some Nine Inch Nails to help me cheer up!
Drinking our bathwater?


User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5734
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: M32
Has thanked: 775 times
Been thanked: 747 times

Re: We are NOT That Good

Post: # 2009393Post samuraisaint »

Take 17 players out of any list of 40 and see how any of the teams go.
If we win Sunday we ARE that good in my opinion.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6540
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5781 times
Been thanked: 1901 times

Re: We are NOT That Good

Post: # 2009395Post Ghost Like »

What were you expecting on the 15th of March Brad? Are we Gooder or not that Gooder from that date in your expectations?

I think we have been exceptional, considering injuries & a new coaching regimen. I had fingers crossed to sneak into the 8 if everything went perfectly. My fingers are still crossed 🤞


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22525
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8472 times
Been thanked: 3734 times

Re: We are NOT That Good

Post: # 2009401Post saynta »

We are not that bad either.


User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8257
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 160 times
Been thanked: 549 times

Re: We are NOT That Good

Post: # 2009402Post Otiman »

samuraisaint wrote: Fri 19 May 2023 7:02pm Take 17 players out of any list of 40 and see how any of the teams go.
If we win Sunday we ARE that good in my opinion.
The more players we got back, the worse we got.

Is that a coincidence?


User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5734
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: M32
Has thanked: 775 times
Been thanked: 747 times

Re: We are NOT That Good

Post: # 2009455Post samuraisaint »

Otiman wrote: Fri 19 May 2023 7:54pm
samuraisaint wrote: Fri 19 May 2023 7:02pm Take 17 players out of any list of 40 and see how any of the teams go.
If we win Sunday we ARE that good in my opinion.
The more players we got back, the worse we got.

Is that a coincidence?
Our best players this season so far have been our first and second year players, but due to Caminiti's suspension and Windy playing in the reserves, this talent has been diluted. We will be a lot better now that we will get back King. RL's teams require a genuine spearhead, otherwise the scoring dries up. Does anybody think we only kick 8 goals against North if we have our forward line in? The loss to Port could have been reversed as well.

Injuries and lack of preparation and conditioning. They are one and the same. If our players hadn't been injured during pre-season and missed mock warfare against Melbourne and Essendon before the season proper they would be a lot better.

Look at how Geelong have come back to the pack, and Swans too.

If we win tomorrow, we will beat the Hawks and then we will be in the fight for the eight up to our necks. But don't kid yourself we will be in the top 4, that is just sophistry. Make the eight; win a final. That should be the supporters' realistic expectation for mine.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22684
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 701 times
Been thanked: 1649 times

Re: We are NOT That Good

Post: # 2009558Post Teflon »

Sack Lyon


“Yeah….nah””
Post Reply