Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9480
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 131 times
Been thanked: 1206 times

Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

Post: # 1957592Post CURLY »

High contact in full view of everyone at the ground yet the umpire somehow missed it.

What was he watching?

Why was it ignored as the force was of the extreme end.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
SaintJohno
Club Player
Posts: 332
Joined: Mon 27 Jan 2020 10:05pm
Has thanked: 208 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

Post: # 1957593Post SaintJohno »

The commentators were saying he hit the ball first so was ok, but that's not a rule is it? Head contact is head contact I thought?


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9480
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 131 times
Been thanked: 1206 times

Re: Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

Post: # 1957594Post CURLY »

SaintJohno wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 9:44am The commentators were saying he hit the ball first so was ok, but that's not a rule is it? Head contact is head contact I thought?
Of course it's not a rule.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6072
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 336 times
Been thanked: 1557 times

Re: Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

Post: # 1957595Post CQ SAINT »

CURLY wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 9:45am
SaintJohno wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 9:44am The commentators were saying he hit the ball first so was ok, but that's not a rule is it? Head contact is head contact I thought?
Of course it's not a rule.
The were worried about the MRO.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22563
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8521 times
Been thanked: 3752 times

Re: Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

Post: # 1957618Post saynta »

CURLY wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 9:40am High contact in full view of everyone at the ground yet the umpire somehow missed it.

What was he watching?

Why was it ignored as the force was of the extreme end.
f****** terrible decision. Just f****** terrible.


User avatar
Life Long Saint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5412
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 456 times
Contact:

Re: Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

Post: # 1957619Post Life Long Saint »

Terrible decision not to pay a free kick.

Ziebell is a grub, too!
I'm trying to think of a more mediocre player to have played 250 games. It's not coming to me.


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9480
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 131 times
Been thanked: 1206 times

Re: Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

Post: # 1957621Post CURLY »

Amazing with all the garbage about protect the head one of our players gets belted and its play on.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13244
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1286 times
Been thanked: 1977 times

Re: Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

Post: # 1957645Post The_Dud »

CURLY wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 9:45am
SaintJohno wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 9:44am The commentators were saying he hit the ball first so was ok, but that's not a rule is it? Head contact is head contact I thought?
Of course it's not a rule.
It's only ok if you knock them out :shock:



All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16567
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3456 times
Been thanked: 2718 times

Re: Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

Post: # 1957646Post skeptic »

Was Ziebell the one that took that cheap shot at Roo years back that was really dangerous?


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9480
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 131 times
Been thanked: 1206 times

Re: Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

Post: # 1957647Post CURLY »

The_Dud wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 4:55pm
CURLY wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 9:45am
SaintJohno wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 9:44am The commentators were saying he hit the ball first so was ok, but that's not a rule is it? Head contact is head contact I thought?
Of course it's not a rule.
It's only ok if you knock them out :shock:

Completely different but a clown may raise that mark rather than admit it was a mistake.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13244
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1286 times
Been thanked: 1977 times

Re: Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

Post: # 1957652Post The_Dud »

CURLY wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 5:07pm
The_Dud wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 4:55pm
CURLY wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 9:45am
SaintJohno wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 9:44am The commentators were saying he hit the ball first so was ok, but that's not a rule is it? Head contact is head contact I thought?
Of course it's not a rule.
It's only ok if you knock them out :shock:

Completely different but a clown may raise that mark rather than admit it was a mistake.
Of course its completely different!

In one the guy in the Saints jumper did the hitting, and in the other the guy in the Saints jumper got hit.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18542
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1525 times
Been thanked: 1876 times

Re: Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

Post: # 1957653Post SaintPav »

Bud will probably get off too.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Banger9798
SS Life Member
Posts: 2676
Joined: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:43pm
Has thanked: 682 times
Been thanked: 757 times

Re: Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

Post: # 1957654Post Banger9798 »

Pretty much an old fashioned coat-hanger...somehow the commentators tried to make a case for it being play on


The Artist formerly known as Fugazi
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9480
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 131 times
Been thanked: 1206 times

Re: Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

Post: # 1957655Post CURLY »

The_Dud wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 5:31pm
CURLY wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 5:07pm
The_Dud wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 4:55pm
CURLY wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 9:45am
SaintJohno wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 9:44am The commentators were saying he hit the ball first so was ok, but that's not a rule is it? Head contact is head contact I thought?
Of course it's not a rule.
It's only ok if you knock them out :shock:

Completely different but a clown may raise that mark rather than admit it was a mistake.
Of course its completely different!

In one the guy in the Saints jumper did the hitting, and in the other the guy in the Saints jumper got hit.
One bloke had his head punch off the other made contact with a player coming the other way with the ball. Completely different.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12701
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 717 times
Been thanked: 401 times

Re: Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

Post: # 1957659Post Mr Magic »

skeptic wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 5:07pm Was Ziebell the one that took that cheap shot at Roo years back that was really dangerous?
Yes


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16567
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3456 times
Been thanked: 2718 times

Re: Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

Post: # 1957660Post skeptic »

Absolutely shocking



User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8572
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 525 times
Been thanked: 1523 times

Re: Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

Post: # 1957689Post kosifantutti »

The_Dud wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 5:31pm
CURLY wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 5:07pm
The_Dud wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 4:55pm
CURLY wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 9:45am
SaintJohno wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 9:44am The commentators were saying he hit the ball first so was ok, but that's not a rule is it? Head contact is head contact I thought?
Of course it's not a rule.
It's only ok if you knock them out :shock:

Completely different but a clown may raise that mark rather than admit it was a mistake.
Of course its completely different!

In one the guy in the Saints jumper did the hitting, and in the other the guy in the Saints jumper got hit.
A huge difference between a defender wildly swinging an arm at the ball and a forward who attacks the ball and doesn’t even see the defender coming the other way.

If you want to compare Harry Taylor being knocked out, look at the Higgins concussion.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18542
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1525 times
Been thanked: 1876 times

Re: Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

Post: # 1957695Post SaintPav »

skeptic wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 6:14pm Absolutely shocking

How many weeks did Ziebell get for that hit?


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
ausfatcat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6516
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:36pm
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 95 times

Re: Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

Post: # 1957707Post ausfatcat »

The_Dud wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 4:55pm

It's only ok if you knock them out :shock:
That's from 13 years ago times have changed, there was less head protection no concussion rule and was a marking contest, rather than a late spoil that missed the ball (probably had no intention of hitting the ball).


User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12693
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 440 times
Been thanked: 1748 times

Re: Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

Post: # 1957708Post The Fireman »

Has it been swept under the carpet ?


User avatar
ausfatcat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6516
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:36pm
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 95 times

Re: Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

Post: # 1957710Post ausfatcat »

SaintPav wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 8:50pm

How many weeks did Ziebell get for that hit?
3 weeks

https://www.nmfc.com.au/news/748019/ziebell-cops-three

the boy's got form





https://www.afl.com.au/news/107181/zieb ... e-mrp-bans

and

a week for this one which is basically the same as yesterday's incident



User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10683
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 801 times

Re: Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

Post: # 1957711Post ace »

The_Dud wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 4:55pm
Damn, the Saints had a fantastic team at that time.
How did they not win the premiership ?

Star studded, would slaughter every team easily today.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA 50:08
User avatar
stevie
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4898
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2010 9:09am
Location: Gold Coast
Has thanked: 194 times
Been thanked: 144 times

Re: Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

Post: # 1957730Post stevie »

Life Long Saint wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 12:46pm Terrible decision not to pay a free kick.

Ziebell is a grub, too!
I'm trying to think of a more mediocre player to have played 250 games. It's not coming to me.
Not sure if they played 250 but Bryce Squibbs and Andrew Swallow spring to mind. Swallow in particular a non entity as a captain. I used to call him Claude Rains. After the actor who played The Invisible Man. Add Heppell too tho thankfully he’s just done 200. Just no impact on any games ever!

And yeah Ziebell has always been a grub.


User avatar
Life Long Saint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5412
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 456 times
Contact:

Re: Ziebell Hit on McKenzie

Post: # 1957732Post Life Long Saint »

stevie wrote: Tue 31 May 2022 7:41am
Life Long Saint wrote: Mon 30 May 2022 12:46pm Terrible decision not to pay a free kick.

Ziebell is a grub, too!
I'm trying to think of a more mediocre player to have played 250 games. It's not coming to me.
Not sure if they played 250 but Bryce Squibbs and Andrew Swallow spring to mind. Swallow in particular a non entity as a captain. I used to call him Claude Rains. After the actor who played The Invisible Man. Add Heppell too tho thankfully he’s just done 200. Just no impact on any games ever!

And yeah Ziebell has always been a grub.
Gibbs played 268. 231 of them with Carlton and 37 irrelevant games for the Crows. His nomination is outstanding when you consider he was a number 1 draft pick.
Swallow only played 224.


Post Reply