Logan Austin
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Logan Austin
Multiple sources including Kane Cornes reporting Port defender Logan Austin will be traded to Saints for a late pick tomorrow.
- parkeysainter
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2696
- Joined: Thu 20 Jul 2017 2:59am
- Location: Brighton Beach Mansion
- Has thanked: 84 times
- Been thanked: 177 times
Re: Logan Austin
Logan who?
Anyway. Do we have a pick though?
Anyway. Do we have a pick though?
Try to be a rainbow in someone's cloud
In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes and the St Kilda FC
In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes and the St Kilda FC
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1303
- Joined: Sun 25 Mar 2012 9:45pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 97 times
Re: Logan Austin
No surprises with the Logan Austin announcement here.. Jaxsons called it some time ago
Good work saints, fills a need... and thanx Jaxsons
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Good work saints, fills a need... and thanx Jaxsons
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1233
- Joined: Fri 04 Nov 2011 3:00pm
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Re: Logan Austin
Yep awesome. Was in their 22 before fractire in leg so had a down 2017. Potential beuatiful kick and mark. Will be a greatctrade for us if we get him for 64. Even 43 will be ok if we know 100% he is fit and ready to get back
- Drake Huggins
- Club Player
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Wed 04 Oct 2017 4:28pm
- Location: The G.G. Huggins Stand
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Logan Austin
Hugh Goddard will be less than thrilled about this. Very similar type. Anyhoo, you can never have enough key position types.
"Is this the right room for an argument?"
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18540
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1525 times
- Been thanked: 1876 times
Re: Logan Austin
Jaxons didn’t call this no disrespect to hm.
One of our own posters did..
One of our own posters did..
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- Drake Huggins
- Club Player
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Wed 04 Oct 2017 4:28pm
- Location: The G.G. Huggins Stand
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Logan Austin
You're right, SP. I believe it was CQS, but I could be wrong. It wasn't Jaxons, but I didn't want to call it for fear of criticising the Messiah and drawing the predictable opprobrium that typically follows such an outrage. No disrespect to Jaxons, either. Valuable poster in the main.
"Is this the right room for an argument?"
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18540
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1525 times
- Been thanked: 1876 times
Re: Logan Austin
No worries DH.Drake Huggins wrote:You're right, SP. I believe it was CQS, but I could be wrong. It wasn't Jaxons, but I didn't want to call it for fear of criticising the Messiah and drawing the predictable opprobrium that typically follows such an outrage. No disrespect to Jaxons, either. Valuable poster in the main.
From memory, Jaxons endorsed the post.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8572
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 525 times
- Been thanked: 1523 times
Re: Logan Austin
Actually it was Jaxons.Drake Huggins wrote:You're right, SP. I believe it was CQS, but I could be wrong. It wasn't Jaxons, but I didn't want to call it for fear of criticising the Messiah and drawing the predictable opprobrium that typically follows such an outrage. No disrespect to Jaxons, either. Valuable poster in the main.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=93983&hilit=Logan&s ... 5#p1702860
CQ guessed Logan Austin and Jaxons confirmed.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Logan Austin
Do we have a late pick?parkeysainter wrote:Logan who?
Anyway. Do we have a pick though?
Umm. Yes. We do.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Logan Austin
+ 1.kosifantutti wrote:Actually it was Jaxons.Drake Huggins wrote:You're right, SP. I believe it was CQS, but I could be wrong. It wasn't Jaxons, but I didn't want to call it for fear of criticising the Messiah and drawing the predictable opprobrium that typically follows such an outrage. No disrespect to Jaxons, either. Valuable poster in the main.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=93983&hilit=Logan&s ... 5#p1702860
CQ guessed Logan Austin and Jaxons confirmed.
Jaxons is a genuine itk.
Not sure why people are bagging him. Weird.
- Drake Huggins
- Club Player
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Wed 04 Oct 2017 4:28pm
- Location: The G.G. Huggins Stand
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Logan Austin
Confirmed CQS' call? Hilarious. So did I. 20/20 hindsight. Give CQS some credit. Great call that someone else piggybacked in on. Again, no disrespect to Jaxons, but he didn't call this and tried to claim a bit of vicarious glory. Facts, people.
"Is this the right room for an argument?"
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8572
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 525 times
- Been thanked: 1523 times
Re: Logan Austin
Maybe have a look at the link I posted.Drake Huggins wrote:Confirmed CQS' call? Hilarious. So did I. 20/20 hindsight. Give CQS some credit. Great call that someone else piggybacked in on. Again, no disrespect to Jaxons, but he didn't call this and tried to claim a bit of vicarious glory. Facts, people.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18540
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1525 times
- Been thanked: 1876 times
Re: Logan Austin
Fine if that’s the case but no reason to get your nickers in a knot Gusto.MC Gusto wrote:That’s bulls***
Jaxons called it with a clue, Cq quite rightly guessed it - which was a good get and jaxons responded confirming
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Thought CQ initially called it, but if Pines called it first, more than glad to be corrected.
It's no biggie.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Re: Logan Austin
SaintPav wrote:Jaxons didn’t call this no disrespect to hm.
One of our own posters did..
Nope. Jaxons referred to "a young defender from P.A".......CTQS worked it out and Jaxons confirmed.
- Drake Huggins
- Club Player
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Wed 04 Oct 2017 4:28pm
- Location: The G.G. Huggins Stand
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Logan Austin
I don't doubt Jaxons, but let's not let fantasy get in the way of truth, kft. Jaxons has credibility, but let's not rewrite history. It just gives his knockers grist for the mill. CQS kade a bloody good call, that was completely out of left field on an unknown target and it looks like coming off. I'd been told the same. No slash on Jaxons. All hail CQS, a poster who puts some really good shyte on here.
"Is this the right room for an argument?"
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Sun 12 Sep 2010 1:17am
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 317 times
Re: Logan Austin
It was Jaxons that called it..
A contact I have at Port said this about him:
"Good fella Logan, can play on bigger defenders and yes Bonar I would take with your pick 8.
If gets consistent opportunity think will be ok."
A contact I have at Port said this about him:
"Good fella Logan, can play on bigger defenders and yes Bonar I would take with your pick 8.
If gets consistent opportunity think will be ok."
- Drake Huggins
- Club Player
- Posts: 906
- Joined: Wed 04 Oct 2017 4:28pm
- Location: The G.G. Huggins Stand
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Logan Austin
Then why not post the target's name if you know it's going to happen? No criticism of Jaxons, but he got scooped this time. Sorry, true believers.st.byron wrote:SaintPav wrote:Jaxons didn’t call this no disrespect to hm.
One of our own posters did..
Nope. Jaxons referred to "a young defender from P.A".......CTQS worked it out and Jaxons confirmed.
"Is this the right room for an argument?"
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Re: Logan Austin
Jaxons is one of our own posters.SaintPav wrote:Jaxons didn’t call this no disrespect to hm.
One of our own posters did..
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7777
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 204 times
- Been thanked: 550 times
Re: Logan Austin
Gotta say that Kane Cornes is an absolute flog. He may be right through.quirky84 wrote:Multiple sources including Kane Cornes reporting Port defender Logan Austin will be traded to Saints for a late pick tomorrow.
Posting 20 years of holey crap!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Re: Logan Austin
Oh lord, you can twist anything whichever way you want to.Drake Huggins wrote:Then why not post the target's name if you know it's going to happen? No criticism of Jaxons, but he got scooped this time. Sorry, true believers.st.byron wrote:SaintPav wrote:Jaxons didn’t call this no disrespect to hm.
One of our own posters did..
Nope. Jaxons referred to "a young defender from P.A".......CTQS worked it out and Jaxons confirmed.
Jaxons first referred to a young defender from P.A. He didn't know it was going to happen. Just said a young defender was being looked at. CQ guessed the name and that equates to Jaxons being 'scooped'. Go figure........
Last edited by st.byron on Wed 18 Oct 2017 9:28pm, edited 1 time in total.