Are we playing too many oldies?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
Bluthy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed 29 May 2013 8:05pm

Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1604645Post Bluthy »

Fisher, Dempster, Montagna, Rooey, Gilbo, Geary - that's a third of first 18. I've seen this year as another "teaching" year where the oldies hand over their knowledge and experience to the youngies on and off the field. Thats obviously been a very conscious plan of the club to ensure the kids are surrounded by that valuable knowledge they can access and get confidence from.

But we are a developing team and we have players that we want to try out - Minch, Curren, Lee, Goddard. Acres, White, Rice, Mckenzie - Freeman will hopefully come on line this year. We've got some talent there that we want to get AFL games into to fast track things. Plus the oldies can almost have an inhibiting role. I think you saw it last night where Bruce and Paddy were working hard to get in the game - admittedly that weren't doing particularly well but they were trying to find their touch. But then Rooey goes forward and sucks up a lot of the forward entries with him as the target. Maybe understandable in his 300th so we'll allow that.

Maybe its a case of giving Dempster a week off and chucking Lee or Goddard in - it may be going backwards to go forwards. Give Gilbo a rest and chuck Minch in. Give Geary a week off and try McKenzie. Perhaps we need to be more aggressive transitioning our next gen team on the field and not be so reliant on the old evergreens who have wonderful ball reading and experience but lack the spark and leg speed to be damaging the other way.


Goose is king
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2295
Joined: Sun 27 Jan 2008 9:05am
Has thanked: 769 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1604647Post Goose is king »

I'd prefer fisher to have a rest for Goddard of he played well or at all yesterday.
And Gearys floaters off the boot really can't be tolerated this day and age


User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1604677Post matrix »

Fisher busted his ass last night with 11 one percenters i think.


User avatar
Dr Spaceman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14102
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1604679Post Dr Spaceman »

Reading SS and the general theme seems to be:

• we're playing too many oldies, and

• our youngies are no good.

May as well go back to sleep


User avatar
Wrote for Luck
Club Player
Posts: 1519
Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 8:33am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1604682Post Wrote for Luck »

Agree wholeheartedly with your post Bluthy found myself getting pretty frustrated watching Dempster and Fisher labor as per usual last night.
Wright was a high-ish draft pick, we have to give him a run at it now.
Frankly I would rather, with intention to give players a go, afford another lot of opportunities to Delaney, for nothing but structure. Dido Membrey.
Also it comes back to the point about giving young players a decent run; maybe we were missing Acres and Templeton last night, indeed.
Dempster has struggled last two games possibly due to his collision early on against Port. Personally I think Simpkin should have been playing this role by now, but that's another story.


Pills 'n' Thrills and Heartaches
longtimesaint
Club Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Thu 01 May 2008 6:30pm
Location: Mentone
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 263 times

Re: Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1604686Post longtimesaint »

It is easy to blame the defence but the ball was always down there.
The problem started in the midfield where we were thrashed out of the centre.
Simarly the forwards had no decent delivery.
I think Fisher and Dempster did ok but it was like trying to stop the tide.
Dempster played on Stringer and kept him relatively quiet considering the amount of ball they had in their forward line.


One year will be our year
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1604694Post Con Gorozidis »

It isnt so much too many oldies per se.
the trouble is all of those guys (apart from Rooey)

Fisher, Dempster, Montagna, Rooey, Gilbo, Geary

Spend most of the time in the back 6. Fisher and Dempster are very slow and Gilbo and Geary cant kick it.

If they were all guns I wouldnt care how old they were - but they arent - and our back 6 is dysfunctional. The coach is delusional if he thinks this old back 6 is going ok. It isnt. It is awful.


Bluthy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed 29 May 2013 8:05pm

Re: Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1604697Post Bluthy »

longtimesaint wrote:It is easy to blame the defence but the ball was always down there.
The problem started in the midfield where we were thrashed out of the centre.
Simarly the forwards had no decent delivery.
I think Fisher and Dempster did ok but it was like trying to stop the tide.
Dempster played on Stringer and kept him relatively quiet considering the amount of ball they had in their forward line.
I agree Dempster and Fisher played well well the ridiculous amount of ball coming in. Thats not the point. Sometimes you have to go backwards to go forward. It feels a bit too comfortable for selectors to first pencil in Fisher, Dempster, Geary, Roo, Monty, Gilbo (we'll work out exactly where they play later) and then, ok who do we fit in now. It's predictable. Geary can't work the ball out from the back. Dempster can't. Fish can but he's got his hands full on the gorrillas.

We know what we get with the oldies. Why not provide a different element to give you team a freshness and unpredictability? You put Goddard he can play on a gorrilla and free Fisher up - risk of Goddard getting towelled up. You put Lee in he can beat the press by hitting a guy on the chest with a 50 m pass - risk when the ball is on the deck and little experience. Playing Minch in the seniors could prove he is a VFL player only - or maybe he goes to another level.

If Richo wants his team to play with dare and risk maybe they need to do the same at the selection table - take a risk and look at the future. We are a development team. Wins are not the be all and end all. I understand it is a balancing act between wanting to be competitive to build a winning culture and needing to develop our young players. But are we too balanced on the conservative side because that's comfortable for selectors? They are not going to get their ass kicked by playing the oldies and having a sub-10 goal loss rather than playes more younger players and copping a 100 pt loss.

But do you have faith in the young players or not? At some point you have to have faith that they can aquit themselves out there without needing all the oldies on all lines holding their hands. It needs to become the young players team. It still very much feels like the old generations team. Next year should be a mini-revolution in this aspect by why not start transitioning a bit more this year?


Myron Gaines
Club Player
Posts: 675
Joined: Tue 15 Mar 2016 7:03pm
Has thanked: 85 times
Been thanked: 136 times

Re: Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1604701Post Myron Gaines »

Dempster & Fisher have lost a few yards. Fisher in particular has become a scrounger of a defender, I'm unsure how he doesn't give away more free kicks. He's always holding onto his opponent. Both in their last year.

Gilbert likely gets another go next year. Joey goes again.

Roo is on his own terms. I'm leaning towards retirement.

Geary surely plays rezzies next year? If he doesn't it shows our lack of player development.


The_President
Club Player
Posts: 878
Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2016 8:05pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1604709Post The_President »

Dr Spaceman wrote:Reading SS and the general theme seems to be:

• we're playing too many oldies, and

• our youngies are no good.

May as well go back to sleep Image

I love you Spaceman


Goose is king
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2295
Joined: Sun 27 Jan 2008 9:05am
Has thanked: 769 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1604754Post Goose is king »

[quote="matrix"]Fisher busted his ass last night with 11 one percenters i think.[/quote]


He is also undersized and stinks in a one-on-one. Often Giving away free kicks in panic


User avatar
Griggsy
SS Life Member
Posts: 2524
Joined: Mon 21 Jul 2008 1:41am
Location: WA

Re: Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1604772Post Griggsy »

Goose is king wrote:
matrix wrote:Fisher busted his ass last night with 11 one percenters i think.

He is also undersized and stinks in a one-on-one. Often Giving away free kicks in panic
True, but these kind of match-ups were never his thing. Trying to teach an old dog new tricks.


Saint_J
Club Player
Posts: 317
Joined: Mon 10 Aug 2015 4:01pm
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1604786Post Saint_J »

sadly the oldies where holding down the hatches most the game. would have hated to see it minus a few of them


User avatar
Wrote for Luck
Club Player
Posts: 1519
Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 8:33am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1604819Post Wrote for Luck »

there have been times when I thought Geary was improving, where he looked great one on one, but that's all vanished from my mind now.


Pills 'n' Thrills and Heartaches
saintbob
SS Life Member
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed 21 May 2008 8:51pm
Location: Tassie
Has thanked: 447 times
Been thanked: 288 times

Re: Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1604874Post saintbob »

What we are doing is playing too many players who play the same role!!

We've got too many half forwards types, with no pace and s*** skills.

Fisher, Roo, Montagna and Dempster simply have to play, as there is no one any better pushing them out.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1604876Post Con Gorozidis »

millarsaint wrote:there have been times when I thought Geary was improving, where he looked great one on one, but that's all vanished from my mind now.
There were times when I loved him too. But I have realised he isnt going to improve and that defenders who cant kick are poison in this day and age. So much of modern day footy relies on the counter attack from half back. If that fails then you are playing with your hand tied behind your back. We cant compete with the big boys if we cant make damaging attacks from half back. The old days of the dour defender who defends well but cant kick are gone with the dodo bird.


Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6518
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1186 times
Been thanked: 444 times

Re: Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1604884Post Jacks Back »

I remember a game back around 2009, or so, where Lyon rested all our good older players and we played the young ones who beat Hawthorn in Tassie I think (the previous year's premiers). Steven had a great game from memory.

Maybe we rest all 6 mentioned on this thread for a game and see what happens?


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
elizabethr
Club Player
Posts: 882
Joined: Tue 04 Oct 2011 10:58pm
Location: qld
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 48 times

Re: Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1604885Post elizabethr »

Jacks Back wrote:I remember a game back around 2009, or so, where Lyon rested all our good older players and we played the young ones who beat Hawthorn in Tassie I think (the previous year's premiers). Steven had a great game from memory.

Maybe we rest all 6 mentioned on this thread for a game and see what happens?
It was Armitage.


nothing to say
Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6518
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1186 times
Been thanked: 444 times

Re: Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1604889Post Jacks Back »

elizabethr wrote:
Jacks Back wrote:I remember a game back around 2009, or so, where Lyon rested all our good older players and we played the young ones who beat Hawthorn in Tassie I think (the previous year's premiers). Steven had a great game from memory.

Maybe we rest all 6 mentioned on this thread for a game and see what happens?
It was Armitage.
You're right. And 3 Brownlow votes. There you go!


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30058
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 705 times
Been thanked: 1219 times

Re: Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1604891Post saintsRrising »

Jacks Back wrote:I remember a game back around 2009, or so, where Lyon rested all our good older players and we played the young ones who beat Hawthorn in Tassie I think (the previous year's premiers). Steven had a great game from memory.
The problem with that is that you left out that the Hawks also fielded a very weal team. Not sure that our opponents will also be willing to do likewise.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6518
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1186 times
Been thanked: 444 times

Re: Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1604892Post Jacks Back »

saintsRrising wrote:
Jacks Back wrote:I remember a game back around 2009, or so, where Lyon rested all our good older players and we played the young ones who beat Hawthorn in Tassie I think (the previous year's premiers). Steven had a great game from memory.
The problem with that is that you left out that the Hawks also fielded a very weal team. Not sure that our opponents will also be willing to do likewise.
The memory is slipping a bit I think. Also there were a few good players still in our side going by the stat sheet...lol. :oops:


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22563
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8521 times
Been thanked: 3752 times

Re: Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1605096Post saynta »

Bluthy wrote:Fisher, Dempster, Montagna, Rooey, Gilbo, Geary - that's a third of first 18. I've seen this year as another "teaching" year where the oldies hand over their knowledge and experience to the youngies on and off the field. Thats obviously been a very conscious plan of the club to ensure the kids are surrounded by that valuable knowledge they can access and get confidence from.

But we are a developing team and we have players that we want to try out - Minch, Curren, Lee, Goddard. Acres, White, Rice, Mckenzie - Freeman will hopefully come on line this year. We've got some talent there that we want to get AFL games into to fast track things. Plus the oldies can almost have an inhibiting role. I think you saw it last night where Bruce and Paddy were working hard to get in the game - admittedly that weren't doing particularly well but they were trying to find their touch. But then Rooey goes forward and sucks up a lot of the forward entries with him as the target. Maybe understandable in his 300th so we'll allow that.

Maybe its a case of giving Dempster a week off and chucking Lee or Goddard in - it may be going backwards to go forwards. Give Gilbo a rest and chuck Minch in. Give Geary a week off and try McKenzie. Perhaps we need to be more aggressive transitioning our next gen team on the field and not be so reliant on the old evergreens who have wonderful ball reading and experience but lack the spark and leg speed to be damaging the other way.

Sensible suggestions imho.


User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8005
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1743 times
Been thanked: 807 times

Re: Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1605108Post WellardSaint »

Geary and Gumby (I mean Gilbo) are never going to help the younger players. It's like 2 grumpy old council workers on a work crew. They bring nothing to the team in terms of quality, and the ball just comes back with interest.


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1605121Post BigMart »

It'd be easier to make excuses about losing... Perhaps no experienced players and it'd be OK to lose every game?!

Are Hawthorn, Sydney, North carrying too many senior players??
Norths best on Sat had 5 players over 28

Dempster, Fisher, Riewoldt, Montagna were amongst our best

Whilst our worst were
Gresham, McCartin, Sinclair, Dunstan


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Are we playing too many oldies?

Post: # 1605126Post Con Gorozidis »

WellardSaint wrote:Geary and Gumby (I mean Gilbo) are never going to help the younger players. It's like 2 grumpy old council workers on a work crew. They bring nothing to the team in terms of quality, and the ball just comes back with interest.
Gilbo and Geary teach the kids that it is all about sucking up to the coach off the park. Once you are in his good books - who gives a s*** how you kick the bloody ball. Heck sometimes it doesnt matter if you dont touch the ball at all. It is all brushed under the carpet or ignored. All your on-field sins are simply washed away and forgiven. It is like being a catholic who is mates with the priest.


Post Reply