Suck it up Geelong

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1499219Post gringo »

Is there a team who has ever got a better run with frees than them though. Lindsay Thomas seems to be the new Schnides...he gets dropped in front of an umpire and they look the other way. Tommahawk gets cheap frees every time yet can hold a defender by the face and push him off and nothing called. The umps certainly helped them look better as they did in a few close wins they came back in. Selwood is a stager just like Thomas but they don't care.


bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1499220Post bergholt »

spert wrote:Geelong had success because they were run by a smarter group of people at CEO and board level than us, and that ultimately filtered down to recruiting and coaching.
No. Geelong have massive natural advantages. They're in a one team town so they have a massive addressable market. They're in multiple marginal seats so there's always government money for them. Geelong itself is basically a company town (for a few different companies) so there's plenty of sponsorship dollars around.

They also picked up two of the best players of all time as father-sons, but I don't see that as the biggest factor. Really it's their natural financial advantages which are showing through.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1499223Post dragit »

gringo wrote:Is there a team who has ever got a better run with frees than them though. Lindsay Thomas seems to be the new Schnides...he gets dropped in front of an umpire and they look the other way. Tommahawk gets cheap frees every time yet can hold a defender by the face and push him off and nothing called. The umps certainly helped them look better as they did in a few close wins they came back in. Selwood is a stager just like Thomas but they don't care.
Thomas's acting is deplorable, he deserves no more free kicks for the rest of his career.

Selwood had his brow opened up by a sniping Harvey shoulder off the ball, another suspension has to come - what an idiot.


Bunk_Moreland
SS Life Member
Posts: 3602
Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1499224Post Bunk_Moreland »

matrix wrote:who friggin cares
theyre out

thats all that matters

jealous over their success it seems
well sucked in to us i say
shouldve kicked goals not points
then they would have one less flag and we would have one more
well said matrix

yes suck it up Geelong

2007
2009
2011

They must be heartbroken - you fools :roll:


You are garbage - Enough said
gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1499225Post gringo »

bergholt wrote:
spert wrote:Geelong had success because they were run by a smarter group of people at CEO and board level than us, and that ultimately filtered down to recruiting and coaching.
No. Geelong have massive natural advantages. They're in a one team town so they have a massive addressable market. They're in multiple marginal seats so there's always government money for them. Geelong itself is basically a company town (for a few different companies) so there's plenty of sponsorship dollars around.

They also picked up two of the best players of all time as father-sons, but I don't see that as the biggest factor. Really it's their natural financial advantages which are showing through.

They drafted a great core around the early 2000s and really had a few great advantages. The property down there is cheap and offers a great surf coast life style. The town gives them all freebies and treats them all like kings. We had to pay our guys like millionaire as they all lived around Brighton and inner bayside where the property and lifestyle cost a lot. $500 000 in Geelong is heaps, it would by you a bathing box in Brighton.


spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8978
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 407 times

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1499246Post spert »

bergholt wrote:
spert wrote:Geelong had success because they were run by a smarter group of people at CEO and board level than us, and that ultimately filtered down to recruiting and coaching.
No. Geelong have massive natural advantages. They're in a one team town so they have a massive addressable market. They're in multiple marginal seats so there's always government money for them. Geelong itself is basically a company town (for a few different companies) so there's plenty of sponsorship dollars around.

They also picked up two of the best players of all time as father-sons, but I don't see that as the biggest factor. Really it's their natural financial advantages which are showing through.
Nah..smart passionate, highly driven hands-on President who made sure he had the best people around him, and who demanded the rung was set high through the club.. the rest is just candy


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30060
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 706 times
Been thanked: 1219 times

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1499250Post saintsRrising »

spert wrote:Geelong had success because they were run by a smarter group of people at CEO and board level than us,

Not sure if it was smarter. But more dedicated, committed and most crucially all willing to work together.

When GT and RB (plus others such as Kellet and Gerry Ryan) were pushing in the same direction all was good at the Saints and were on the up and up offield and on. They had the "smarts", but not the capacity to all work together. Losing Gerry Ryan in being as active as he was (he still plays a role) wasa major loss. Let's hope our CEO can get him more involved again.

Problems set in when egos got in the way and each party took "my way or the highway" stances.

Unfortunately their successors in Footy First turned out to Footy Farce, and Westaway should change his name to Wasteaway. Like a child inheriting the family fortune, Wasteaway blew the lot.
spert wrote: and that ultimately filtered down to recruiting and coaching.
Yes and no. Their recruiting guy was one out of the box. Being in a great environment meant that the Cats could make the most of his talent.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
MCG-Unit
SS Life Member
Posts: 3134
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 4:04pm
Location: Land of the Giants
Has thanked: 473 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1499252Post MCG-Unit »

maverick wrote:
Old Mate wrote:
MCG-Unit wrote:
magnifisaint wrote:But geez they play the game right out to the death knell. They give their supporters a lot of hope
Yep they never stopped - even when 6+ goals down. I wish the Saints had got Caddy.
I'm not tying to make matters any worse but you realise the club prioritised Tom Lee over Caddy? He was keen to come to us and we had pick 12 to get him, better than any other offer GC recieved. He's an absolute bull and will be a star. He's basically a quicker and A grade version of Armo.
When did Caddy want to come to us? Are we rewriting history here?
No rewriting history - maybe do some research. I remember that trade period 2012, here are just 2 links, not looking up more. Not so sure Caddy was that keen, but seems the Saints were.

"After two seasons with the Suns, Caddy has requested a trade back home to Victoria ......St Kilda says it is making a play for the highly regarded 20-year-old, but it is understood the Saints are not one of his preferred options."

http://www.news.com.au/national/geelong ... 6487945109


".....But St Kilda have been heavily linked with Caddy, though Melbourne and the W Bulldogs could also come into play as possible homes for the midfielder....."

http://wwos.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=8530641


Hold your ground :shock:
maverick
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5009
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
Location: Bayside
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 88 times

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1499254Post maverick »

MCG-Unit wrote:
maverick wrote:
Old Mate wrote:
MCG-Unit wrote:
magnifisaint wrote:But geez they play the game right out to the death knell. They give their supporters a lot of hope
Yep they never stopped - even when 6+ goals down. I wish the Saints had got Caddy.
I'm not tying to make matters any worse but you realise the club prioritised Tom Lee over Caddy? He was keen to come to us and we had pick 12 to get him, better than any other offer GC recieved. He's an absolute bull and will be a star. He's basically a quicker and A grade version of Armo.
When did Caddy want to come to us? Are we rewriting history here?
No rewriting history - maybe do some research. I remember that trade period 2012, here are just 2 links, not looking up more. Not so sure Caddy was that keen, but seems the Saints were.

"After two seasons with the Suns, Caddy has requested a trade back home to Victoria ......St Kilda says it is making a play for the highly regarded 20-year-old, but it is understood the Saints are not one of his preferred options."

http://www.news.com.au/national/geelong ... 6487945109


".....But St Kilda have been heavily linked with Caddy, though Melbourne and the W Bulldogs could also come into play as possible homes for the midfielder....."

http://wwos.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=8530641
Nice research, which bit says he wanted to come to us….


User avatar
MCG-Unit
SS Life Member
Posts: 3134
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 4:04pm
Location: Land of the Giants
Has thanked: 473 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1499255Post MCG-Unit »

maverick wrote:
MCG-Unit wrote:
maverick wrote:
Old Mate wrote:
MCG-Unit wrote:
magnifisaint wrote:But geez they play the game right out to the death knell. They give their supporters a lot of hope
Yep they never stopped - even when 6+ goals down. I wish the Saints had got Caddy.
I'm not tying to make matters any worse but you realise the club prioritised Tom Lee over Caddy? He was keen to come to us and we had pick 12 to get him, better than any other offer GC recieved. He's an absolute bull and will be a star. He's basically a quicker and A grade version of Armo.
When did Caddy want to come to us? Are we rewriting history here?
No rewriting history - maybe do some research. I remember that trade period 2012, here are just 2 links, not looking up more. Not so sure Caddy was that keen, but seems the Saints were.

"After two seasons with the Suns, Caddy has requested a trade back home to Victoria ......St Kilda says it is making a play for the highly regarded 20-year-old, but it is understood the Saints are not one of his preferred options."

http://www.news.com.au/national/geelong ... 6487945109

".....But St Kilda have been heavily linked with Caddy, though Melbourne and the W Bulldogs could also come into play as possible homes for the midfielder....."

http://wwos.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=8530641
Nice research, which bit says he wanted to come to us….
Where did I say he wanted to be a Saint? Another poster in the quotes above said this. I even said in my reply to you, "...not so sure Caddy was keen, but seems the Saints were."

I remembered the Saints were quite keen, which is why I initally wrote "wish we got Caddy" and was slammed for that.


Hold your ground :shock:
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18596
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1535 times
Been thanked: 1884 times

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1499273Post SaintPav »

SainterK wrote:I'm the opposite, I have this weird logic that the better they are, the less shame in losing to them in 09
I can understand why you would say that but the 2014 Cats compared to the 2009 Cats are completely different teams.

You would have a good point back in 04, 05 and 08 in the losing prelims we lost to the eventual Premiers, for example.

As my patronizing boss would go on to ask (say), does THAT make sense? :mrgreen:


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
suss
Club Player
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sun 22 May 2005 11:42pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 90 times

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1499274Post suss »

They were gifted, in effect, three number 1 draft picks because of good quality semen and poor AFL policy. That lead to the premierships and a decade of dominance. Well done AFL for keeping romance in the game.


User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11225
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 134 times

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1499282Post Bernard Shakey »

suss wrote:They were gifted, in effect, three number 1 draft picks because of good quality semen and poor AFL policy. That lead to the premierships and a decade of dominance. Well done AFL for keeping romance in the game.
We were gifted Goddard!


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11225
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 134 times

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1499284Post Bernard Shakey »

gringo wrote:
bergholt wrote:
spert wrote:Geelong had success because they were run by a smarter group of people at CEO and board level than us, and that ultimately filtered down to recruiting and coaching.
No. Geelong have massive natural advantages. They're in a one team town so they have a massive addressable market. They're in multiple marginal seats so there's always government money for them. Geelong itself is basically a company town (for a few different companies) so there's plenty of sponsorship dollars around.

They also picked up two of the best players of all time as father-sons, but I don't see that as the biggest factor. Really it's their natural financial advantages which are showing through.

They drafted a great core around the early 2000s and really had a few great advantages. The property down there is cheap and offers a great surf coast life style. The town gives them all freebies and treats them all like kings. We had to pay our guys like millionaire as they all lived around Brighton and inner bayside where the property and lifestyle cost a lot. $500 000 in Geelong is heaps, it would by you a bathing box in Brighton.
It would get you two bathing boxes, they go for about $220,000 and you don't even own them. Don't exagerrate!


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
suss
Club Player
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sun 22 May 2005 11:42pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 90 times

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1499314Post suss »

Bernard Shakey wrote:
suss wrote:They were gifted, in effect, three number 1 draft picks because of good quality semen and poor AFL policy. That lead to the premierships and a decade of dominance. Well done AFL for keeping romance in the game.
We were gifted Goddard!
True but we were terrible and that policy was to assist really poor teams to compete. They got two Abletts, Scarlett and Hawkins because someone somewhere wants to see sons play for their fathers' teams.

Imagine the 09 grand final again. Take away Ablett, Scarlett and Hawkins. Who wins?


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1499323Post dragit »

suss wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:
suss wrote:They were gifted, in effect, three number 1 draft picks because of good quality semen and poor AFL policy. That lead to the premierships and a decade of dominance. Well done AFL for keeping romance in the game.
We were gifted Goddard!
True but we were terrible and that policy was to assist really poor teams to compete. They got two Abletts, Scarlett and Hawkins because someone somewhere wants to see sons play for their fathers' teams.

Imagine the 09 grand final again. Take away Ablett, Scarlett and Hawkins. Who wins?
It's not the actual sons that are the big deal, it's where they were able to take them, allowing them to take 3 players beforehand - Bartel, Johnson, Kelly, Selwood… take some of these guys out of the side and they'd be lucky to have one flag.


lefty
Club Player
Posts: 1297
Joined: Tue 28 Sep 2004 8:11pm
Been thanked: 36 times

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1499346Post lefty »

hahahahaah Geelong, suck shite :P
Mckay you deserve it!

Arrogant Geelong and their supporters. The cliff is coming.


suss
Club Player
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sun 22 May 2005 11:42pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 90 times

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1499347Post suss »

dragit wrote:
suss wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:
suss wrote:They were gifted, in effect, three number 1 draft picks because of good quality semen and poor AFL policy. That lead to the premierships and a decade of dominance. Well done AFL for keeping romance in the game.
We were gifted Goddard!
True but we were terrible and that policy was to assist really poor teams to compete. They got two Abletts, Scarlett and Hawkins because someone somewhere wants to see sons play for their fathers' teams.

Imagine the 09 grand final again. Take away Ablett, Scarlett and Hawkins. Who wins?
It's not the actual sons that are the big deal, it's where they were able to take them, allowing them to take 3 players beforehand - Bartel, Johnson, Kelly, Selwood… take some of these guys out of the side and they'd be lucky to have one flag.
It's both. People will say it's fixed now because of the bidding system. That still allows a team to win the premiership and be gifted the effective number 1 draft pick. It's a bulls*** rule that has no place in modern football.

Out of interest I just googled Hawkins to see where he went in the draft. He went at pick 41. In the same year they got Selwood at pick 7. And people think they won three premierships through good management. My god.


Heidelberg_Saint
Club Player
Posts: 199
Joined: Tue 05 Jul 2011 9:32pm
Location: Heidelberg, Vic

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1499416Post Heidelberg_Saint »

Cliff, Geelong, fallen off.


User avatar
BakesFan
SS Life Member
Posts: 3721
Joined: Wed 14 Apr 2004 9:55am
Location: in the G1

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1499428Post BakesFan »

matrix wrote:who friggin cares
theyre out

thats all that matters

jealous over their success it seems
well sucked in to us i say
shouldve kicked goals not points
then they would have one less flag and we would have one more
...they kicked a point that was counted as a goal. :evil:


Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.(Eleanor Roosevelt)
Image
Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11300
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1295 times
Been thanked: 437 times

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1499639Post Sainternist »

I have nothing but contempt Geelong. Have since 1991. Was happy to see the back of them.

Well played, North Melbourne! Hope they finish off the Swines in the PF. Now that would put a big smile on my face.


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
User avatar
White Winmar
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5014
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1499645Post White Winmar »

The era is over. The end of eras are usually marked by a significant event, or events. Going out in back to back finals is a good example. They'll probably have a soft landing, but they won't be a genuine contender for some time yet.


I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1500281Post dragit »

Brent Harvey free to play - what a f****** joke.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1500283Post plugger66 »

dragit wrote:Brent Harvey free to play - what a f****** joke.



Yep bad news for all the people who want to go back to the old system


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Suck it up Geelong

Post: # 1500286Post dragit »

plugger66 wrote:
dragit wrote:Brent Harvey free to play - what a f****** joke.
Yep bad news for all the people who want to go back to the old system
As in testimony from the recipient?

"he didn't hit me hard"


Geelong submitted a medical report that stated it was possible Selwood could bleed more above his right eye because of past injuries to the area.

ridiculous.


Post Reply