Banning of Principle of Q'uo

The place to discuss issues with administrators and moderators. Suggestions welcome. All bans will be posted here and the banning appeals process will be held in this forum.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
Bunk_Moreland
SS Life Member
Posts: 3602
Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Mystery de-bunked

Post: # 1493551Post Bunk_Moreland »

HitTheBoundary wrote:
Bunk_Moreland wrote:BM will also publish BM's response.
Why are you third person in this forum but first person on the fan forum? Just wondering.

Bunk_Moreland wonders the same thing.

Maybe it is a different person logging in as Bunk_Moreland on the football forum compared to the Admin forum. After all it is only an internet persona.


You are garbage - Enough said
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Banning of Principle of Q'uo

Post: # 1493559Post plugger66 »

Bunk_Moreland wrote:
plugger66 wrote: Anyway can you explain manners because Im confused why it seems you dont think I have any? Plugger66 looks forward to BM response.

Apologies Plugger66, but it is not BM's role or responsibility to teach you or anybody basic manners.

it is your responsibility to learn them and understand them as society standards currently expect.

I thought i had manners but you suggested I didnt so I was requesting what you call manners or are they all the same for every single person in the world? I doubting that so if you could explain how asking questions and not agreeing with someone isnt manners then it would be much appreciated. I just rang my Dad and he said you can disagree with someone and ask questions but still have manners in his opinion. You were obviously brought up differently but you arent a person anyway, you are just a nic from what ive been told.


Bunk_Moreland
SS Life Member
Posts: 3602
Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Banning of Principle of Q'uo

Post: # 1493612Post Bunk_Moreland »

plugger66 wrote:
Bunk_Moreland wrote:
plugger66 wrote: Anyway can you explain manners because Im confused why it seems you dont think I have any? Plugger66 looks forward to BM response.

Apologies Plugger66, but it is not BM's role or responsibility to teach you or anybody basic manners.

it is your responsibility to learn them and understand them as society standards currently expect.

I thought i had manners but you suggested I didnt so I was requesting what you call manners or are they all the same for every single person in the world? I doubting that so if you could explain how asking questions and not agreeing with someone isnt manners then it would be much appreciated. I just rang my Dad and he said you can disagree with someone and ask questions but still have manners in his opinion. You were obviously brought up differently but you arent a person anyway, you are just a nic from what ive been told.
You are correct Bunk_Moreland is not a person. Well done, you finally get it.

If BM specifically stated in a post that Plugger66 has poor manner or is courteous then BM apologies. P66 has not referred to Bunk_Moreland by any other nic since asked to.

BM disagrees with Plugger66 opinion on the stance though and believes that it is an overreaction by some on this forum to a simple request.

BM still has to report posters for deliberate baiting. If P66 deliberately baits BM, BM will report P66. BM has not reported P66 as P66 has not referred to BM by any other name.


You are garbage - Enough said
User avatar
SENsei
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7128
Joined: Mon 05 Jun 2006 8:25pm

Re: Banning of Principle of Q'uo

Post: # 1493669Post SENsei »

Would Spunk Boreland count as another name and worthy of a report?


Poster formerly known as SENsaintsational. More wisdom. More knowledge. Less name.
Bunk_Moreland
SS Life Member
Posts: 3602
Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Banning of Principle of Q'uo

Post: # 1493736Post Bunk_Moreland »

SENsaintsational wrote:Would Spunk Boreland count as another name and worthy of a report?
If you are using that name in a derogratory way towards a poster it would be classed as baiting so yes it is worthy of a report.

Please see forum rules.


You are garbage - Enough said
User avatar
SENsei
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7128
Joined: Mon 05 Jun 2006 8:25pm

Re: Banning of Principle of Q'uo

Post: # 1493742Post SENsei »

Bunk_Moreland wrote:
SENsaintsational wrote:Would Spunk Boreland count as another name and worthy of a report?
If you are using that name in a derogratory way towards a poster it would be classed as baiting so yes it is worthy of a report.

Please see forum rules.
You know, I would've thought Spunk could only be taken in a positive way! Although I see that the two meanings of the word Bore can get confusing. But as long as I know that Bunk is no Spunk and a Bore no More, I will not address him/her/it/BM in that way.

Glad we cleared that one up as it kept me awake all last night.


Poster formerly known as SENsaintsational. More wisdom. More knowledge. Less name.
User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: Mystery de-bunked

Post: # 1493746Post stinger »

BackFromTheChinaCafe wrote:
plugger66 wrote: BM why this third person crap.
This remind me of Charlie Chan mystery. "Case of the Third Person Posting".

Very baffling. Then, clue earlier in thread. Ancient writings of prophet Simon now illuminate for all.

Jaffaboy is first person posting.
Nextmess Stringer is second person posting.
So, Bunk Moreland must be third person posting.


Case of................. man who ride tiger, cannot dismount?

duel nics??????


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
User avatar
GrumpyOne
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8163
Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2010 9:25am
Location: Kicked out of the Coffee Shop, Settlement Pub, Cranbourne

Re: Mystery de-bunked

Post: # 1493751Post GrumpyOne »

stinger wrote:
BackFromTheChinaCafe wrote:
plugger66 wrote: BM why this third person crap.
This remind me of Charlie Chan mystery. "Case of the Third Person Posting".

Very baffling. Then, clue earlier in thread. Ancient writings of prophet Simon now illuminate for all.

Jaffaboy is first person posting.
Nextmess Stringer is second person posting.
So, Bunk Moreland must be third person posting.


Case of................. man who ride tiger, cannot dismount?

duel nics??????
Can you hear me Harry?


Australia...... Live it like we stole it....... Because we did.
User avatar
SENsei
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7128
Joined: Mon 05 Jun 2006 8:25pm

Re: Banning of Principle of Q'uo

Post: # 1493761Post SENsei »

Hopman?
Houdini?
Windsor?
Hamlin?
Beitzel?


Poster formerly known as SENsaintsational. More wisdom. More knowledge. Less name.
User avatar
Dave McNamara
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5709
Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 74 times

Re: Mystery de-bunked

Post: # 1493795Post Dave McNamara »

stinger wrote:duel nics??????
Nics duel on SS all the time. :wink:


It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
skeptic wrote: Tue 30 Jan 2024 8:07pmCongrats to Dave McNamara - hereby dubbed the KNOWINGEST KNOW IT ALL of Saintsational
:mrgreen:
User avatar
Dave McNamara
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5709
Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 74 times

Re: Banning of Principle of Q'uo

Post: # 1493797Post Dave McNamara »

Bunk_Moreland wrote:You are correct Bunk_Moreland is not a person.
:shock:

What? So BM is a spam bot?


It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
skeptic wrote: Tue 30 Jan 2024 8:07pmCongrats to Dave McNamara - hereby dubbed the KNOWINGEST KNOW IT ALL of Saintsational
:mrgreen:
Bunk_Moreland
SS Life Member
Posts: 3602
Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Banning of Principle of Q'uo

Post: # 1493809Post Bunk_Moreland »

Dave McNamara wrote:
Bunk_Moreland wrote:You are correct Bunk_Moreland is not a person.
:shock:

What? So BM is a spam bot?

No, BM is not a Spam Bot. Bunk_Moreland was a fictional character in a series called The Wire

Bunk_Moreland on SS is a nic or avatar

Therefore neither are real people.

Sheesh, this is like explaining concepts to kindergarten children.


You are garbage - Enough said
User avatar
GrumpyOne
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8163
Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2010 9:25am
Location: Kicked out of the Coffee Shop, Settlement Pub, Cranbourne

Re: Banning of Principle of Q'uo

Post: # 1493817Post GrumpyOne »

The one thing I would like to see other than the end of discussions about BM's alleged change of identity, and that is for BM to stop talking in the third person. It was cute for the first week, now it is just getting tedious and boring.


Australia...... Live it like we stole it....... Because we did.
User avatar
Dr Spaceman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14102
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Banning of Principle of Q'uo

Post: # 1493819Post Dr Spaceman »

GrumpyOne wrote:The one thing I would like to see other than the end of discussions about BM's alleged change of identity, and that is for BM to stop talking in the third person. It was cute for the first week, now it is just getting tedious and boring.
I second that!





And so does Dr Spaceman :wink:


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Banning of Principle of Q'uo

Post: # 1493829Post plugger66 »

Bunk_Moreland wrote:
Dave McNamara wrote:
Bunk_Moreland wrote:You are correct Bunk_Moreland is not a person.
:shock:

What? So BM is a spam bot?

No, BM is not a Spam Bot. Bunk_Moreland was a fictional character in a series called The Wire

Bunk_Moreland on SS is a nic or avatar

Therefore neither are real people.

Sheesh, this is like explaining concepts to kindergarten children.

Who types this stuff for the fictional BM?


Bunk_Moreland
SS Life Member
Posts: 3602
Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Banning of Principle of Q'uo

Post: # 1493860Post Bunk_Moreland »

plugger66 wrote:
Bunk_Moreland wrote:
Dave McNamara wrote:
Bunk_Moreland wrote:You are correct Bunk_Moreland is not a person.
:shock:

What? So BM is a spam bot?

No, BM is not a Spam Bot. Bunk_Moreland was a fictional character in a series called The Wire

Bunk_Moreland on SS is a nic or avatar

Therefore neither are real people.

Sheesh, this is like explaining concepts to kindergarten children.

Who types this stuff for the fictional BM?
That is a very good question P66


You are garbage - Enough said
Bunk_Moreland
SS Life Member
Posts: 3602
Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Banning of Principle of Q'uo

Post: # 1493862Post Bunk_Moreland »

GrumpyOne wrote:The one thing I would like to see other than the end of discussions about BM's alleged change of identity, and that is for BM to stop talking in the third person. It was cute for the first week, now it is just getting tedious and boring.
Bunk_Moreland has no control over your intolerance and character flaws GO. Bunk_Moreland is sad to think that someones life is so bereft of spark and interest that they need to be "entertained" by an Internet forum, and is disappointed and angry when not entertained.

Bunk_Moreland only has love and best wishes for the Grumpy One. However it is indicative that Grumpy One is acting to character :cry:


You are garbage - Enough said
loris
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4505
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
Has thanked: 324 times
Been thanked: 397 times

Re: Banning of Principle of Q'uo

Post: # 1493865Post loris »

Dr Spaceman wrote:
GrumpyOne wrote:The one thing I would like to see other than the end of discussions about BM's alleged change of identity, and that is for BM to stop talking in the third person. It was cute for the first week, now it is just getting tedious and boring.
I second that!





And so does Dr Spaceman :wink:
Loris wonders if Dr Spaceman can also second it in this instance?

Loris thinks maybe Dr Spaceman can/has third personed the comment :? :? :? :? :?


The Redeemer
SS Life Member
Posts: 2622
Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm

Re: Mystery de-bunked

Post: # 1493886Post The Redeemer »

Bunk_Moreland wrote:
HitTheBoundary wrote:
Bunk_Moreland wrote:BM will also publish BM's response.
Why are you third person in this forum but first person on the fan forum? Just wondering.

Bunk_Moreland wonders the same thing.

Maybe it is a different person logging in as Bunk_Moreland on the football forum compared to the Admin forum. After all it is only an internet persona.
Reincarnated says this.

Stop pretending to be of the intelligence or financial well-being of Reincarnated.

Reincarnated sells and buys people like you all day every day.


Bunk_Moreland
SS Life Member
Posts: 3602
Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Mystery de-bunked

Post: # 1493891Post Bunk_Moreland »

The Redeemer wrote:
Bunk_Moreland wrote:
HitTheBoundary wrote:
Bunk_Moreland wrote:BM will also publish BM's response.
Why are you third person in this forum but first person on the fan forum? Just wondering.

Bunk_Moreland wonders the same thing.

Maybe it is a different person logging in as Bunk_Moreland on the football forum compared to the Admin forum. After all it is only an internet persona.
Reincarnated says this.

Stop pretending to be of the intelligence or financial well-being of Reincarnated.

Reincarnated sells and buys people like you all day every day.
Reincarnated is a disabled nic and has no relevance in this instance.

Redeemer is an active nic whom Bunk_Moreland is falling in love with, in an incarcerated, redeemer is BM's bitch, sort of way


You are garbage - Enough said
The Redeemer
SS Life Member
Posts: 2622
Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm

Re: Mystery de-bunked

Post: # 1493893Post The Redeemer »

Bunk_Moreland wrote:
The Redeemer wrote:
Bunk_Moreland wrote:
HitTheBoundary wrote:
Bunk_Moreland wrote:BM will also publish BM's response.
Why are you third person in this forum but first person on the fan forum? Just wondering.

Bunk_Moreland wonders the same thing.

Maybe it is a different person logging in as Bunk_Moreland on the football forum compared to the Admin forum. After all it is only an internet persona.
Reincarnated says this.

Stop pretending to be of the intelligence or financial well-being of Reincarnated.

Reincarnated sells and buys people like you all day every day.
Reincarnated is a disabled nic and has no relevance in this instance.

Redeemer is an active nic whom Bunk_Moreland is falling in love with, in an incarcerated, redeemer is BM's bitch, sort of way
Well i'm out


Bunk_Moreland
SS Life Member
Posts: 3602
Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Mystery de-bunked

Post: # 1493895Post Bunk_Moreland »

The Redeemer wrote:
Bunk_Moreland wrote:
The Redeemer wrote:
Bunk_Moreland wrote:
HitTheBoundary wrote:
Bunk_Moreland wrote:BM will also publish BM's response.
Why are you third person in this forum but first person on the fan forum? Just wondering.

Bunk_Moreland wonders the same thing.

Maybe it is a different person logging in as Bunk_Moreland on the football forum compared to the Admin forum. After all it is only an internet persona.
Reincarnated says this.

Stop pretending to be of the intelligence or financial well-being of Reincarnated.

Reincarnated sells and buys people like you all day every day.
Reincarnated is a disabled nic and has no relevance in this instance.

Redeemer is an active nic whom Bunk_Moreland is falling in love with, in an incarcerated, redeemer is BM's bitch, sort of way
Well i'm out

BM believes Redeemer is softer than Delta


You are garbage - Enough said
User avatar
GrumpyOne
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8163
Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2010 9:25am
Location: Kicked out of the Coffee Shop, Settlement Pub, Cranbourne

Re: Banning of Principle of Q'uo

Post: # 1493981Post GrumpyOne »

GO is looking forward to the return of POQ, so that this waste of forum space can be deleted.


Australia...... Live it like we stole it....... Because we did.
User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: Banning of Principle of Q'uo

Post: # 1493988Post stinger »

time to close this farcical thread imhfo......


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
Bunk_Moreland
SS Life Member
Posts: 3602
Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Banning of Principle of Q'uo

Post: # 1494013Post Bunk_Moreland »

Regardless of whether this thread is closed or not, Bunk_Moreland will not be bullied by the usual suspects who are more akin to a pack of wild dogs, into posting in any particular fashion.

This bullyboy, high handed, holier than thou attacks on posters rights has to stop as well.

Bunk_Moreland can post in whatever style and fashion Bunk_Moreland deems fit, and to hell with any other poster.

Bun_Moreland says get used to it, or don't post on SS.


You are garbage - Enough said
Post Reply