Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

The place to discuss issues with administrators and moderators. Suggestions welcome. All bans will be posted here and the banning appeals process will be held in this forum.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
tedtheodorelogan2018
SS Life Member
Posts: 3022
Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2018 12:02am
Has thanked: 559 times
Been thanked: 452 times

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815126Post tedtheodorelogan2018 »

Term is banned by the boss that runs this joint.

Move on. Get over it.


Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22436
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8355 times
Been thanked: 3703 times

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815141Post saynta »

tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: Thu 08 Aug 2019 8:17pm Term is banned by the boss that runs this joint.

Move on. Get over it.
Thank god that you post here ted.


satchmo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6655
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
Location: Hotel Bastardos
Has thanked: 191 times
Been thanked: 166 times
Contact:

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815145Post satchmo »

tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: Thu 08 Aug 2019 8:17pm Term is banned by the boss that runs this joint.

Move on. Get over it.
Thank cho that you're not a mod.


*Allegedly.

Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.

You can't un-fry things.


Last Post
User avatar
degruch
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8948
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
Location: Croydonia
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815151Post degruch »

saynta wrote: Thu 08 Aug 2019 7:51pm Get a life people and move on. Nothing to see here. Some posters are like a dog with a f****** bone.
...says the poster who raised it in the first place, and most likely dobbed on the OP. Can you tell us again what we're all supposedly saying when we use a popular nickname for our ex-choach?


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22436
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8355 times
Been thanked: 3703 times

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815200Post saynta »

degruch wrote: Thu 08 Aug 2019 9:55pm
saynta wrote: Thu 08 Aug 2019 7:51pm Get a life people and move on. Nothing to see here. Some posters are like a dog with a f****** bone.
...says the poster who raised it in the first place, and most likely dobbed on the OP. Can you tell us again what we're all supposedly saying when we use a popular nickname for our ex-choach?
Wrong again. You are making a habit of it. I didn't dob on the original poster. Can't even tell you who it was but he/she wasn't the only one,

According to Simon, the original author was banned. And contrary to the s*** posted on here by the bone worriers, Simon was well aware of the meaning of the very offensive term.

And while we are talking about dobbers, how many times have you tried to get me banned?
Last edited by saynta on Fri 09 Aug 2019 2:42pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7922
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 122 times
Been thanked: 1082 times

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815213Post Devilhead »

saynta wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 11:42am
degruch wrote: Thu 08 Aug 2019 9:55pm
saynta wrote: Thu 08 Aug 2019 7:51pm Get a life people and move on. Nothing to see here. Some posters are like a dog with a f****** bone.
...says the poster who raised it in the first place, and most likely dobbed on the OP. Can you tell us again what we're all supposedly saying when we use a popular nickname for our ex-choach?
Wrong again. You are making a habit of it. I didn't dob on the original poster. Can't even tell you who it was but he/she wasn't the only one,

According to Simon, the original author was banned. And contrary to the s*** posted on here by the bone worriers, Simon was well aware of the meaning of the very offensive term.

And while we are talking about dobers, how many times have you tried to get me banned?
You mean the one extremely obscure meaning .....the one amongst many other legitimate meanings/definitions/uses of the term

You are wrong on this one Saynta - it's completely ridiculous overkill given that 99% of the posters have used the term as a friendly fun nick without any hint of pornographic duplicity

Open your eyes Sanyta and just admit that this is a classic case of over moderation

The Confederation of Healing Organisations, The Credit Hire Organisation, Margaret Cho and some Nepalese villagers agree

Lift the Ban!!


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
User avatar
asiu
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10187
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
Has thanked: 1274 times
Been thanked: 899 times

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815223Post asiu »

thats 2x b in dobbers


Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.

.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12923
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1269 times
Been thanked: 1933 times

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815226Post The_Dud »

Why are we still talking about this?


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
Cordz2
Club Player
Posts: 388
Joined: Fri 15 Jul 2016 3:05pm
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 87 times

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815242Post Cordz2 »

Devilhead wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 1:03pm
saynta wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 11:42am
degruch wrote: Thu 08 Aug 2019 9:55pm
saynta wrote: Thu 08 Aug 2019 7:51pm Get a life people and move on. Nothing to see here. Some posters are like a dog with a f****** bone.
...says the poster who raised it in the first place, and most likely dobbed on the OP. Can you tell us again what we're all supposedly saying when we use a popular nickname for our ex-choach?
Wrong again. You are making a habit of it. I didn't dob on the original poster. Can't even tell you who it was but he/she wasn't the only one,

According to Simon, the original author was banned. And contrary to the s*** posted on here by the bone worriers, Simon was well aware of the meaning of the very offensive term.

And while we are talking about dobers, how many times have you tried to get me banned?
You mean the one extremely obscure meaning .....the one amongst many other legitimate meanings/definitions/uses of the term

You are wrong on this one Saynta - it's completely ridiculous overkill given that 99% of the posters have used the term as a friendly fun nick without any hint of pornographic duplicity

Open your eyes Sanyta and just admit that this is a classic case of over moderation

The Confederation of Healing Organisations, The Credit Hire Organisation, Margaret Cho and some Nepalese villagers agree

Lift the Ban!!
Devil head is right. The Urban dictionary has a meaning for almost any 3 letters placed together in the alphabet. Someone is some schoolyard in the US probably with the surname Richardson did that despicable act and now 20 teenagers in the US name it after him. The Urban dictionary gets people updating with these extremely obscure definitions. Anyone over here who believe the term is being used as anything other than short for Richardson is gullible and has no understanding if the way internet terminology such as this is being used. Remember when anyone wearing a black Sabbath T Shirt was a potential devil worshipper? Another sign of an older generation completely out of sync with societal changes.
Drop the ridiculous freaking ban.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22436
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8355 times
Been thanked: 3703 times

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815244Post saynta »

Devilhead wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 1:03pm
saynta wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 11:42am
degruch wrote: Thu 08 Aug 2019 9:55pm
saynta wrote: Thu 08 Aug 2019 7:51pm Get a life people and move on. Nothing to see here. Some posters are like a dog with a f****** bone.
...says the poster who raised it in the first place, and most likely dobbed on the OP. Can you tell us again what we're all supposedly saying when we use a popular nickname for our ex-choach?
Wrong again. You are making a habit of it. I didn't dob on the original poster. Can't even tell you who it was but he/she wasn't the only one,

According to Simon, the original author was banned. And contrary to the s*** posted on here by the bone worriers, Simon was well aware of the meaning of the very offensive term.

And while we are talking about dobers, how many times have you tried to get me banned?
You mean the one extremely obscure meaning .....the one amongst many other legitimate meanings/definitions/uses of the term

You are wrong on this one Saynta - it's completely ridiculous overkill given that 99% of the posters have used the term as a friendly fun nick without any hint of pornographic duplicity

Open your eyes Sanyta and just admit that this is a classic case of over moderation

The Confederation of Healing Organisations, The Credit Hire Organisation, Margaret Cho and some Nepalese villagers agree

Lift the Ban!!

I call bulls*** on your post. You are the one with your eyes closed.

The term wasn't being used as a" friendly fun nick without any hint of pornographic duplicity". In my view it was being used , by some, with malicious intent , hence the reason Simon banned the term.

Why would you want the ban lifted? So some moron can use it to further denigrate a sacked coach? :roll: :roll: :roll: Get real., and move on.

I have grown tired of the malicious crap printed on here about Richo these past two years and now you want me to believe it was all just a bit of fun. Yeah sure it was.


User avatar
barneyboyz
Club Player
Posts: 1133
Joined: Thu 08 Mar 2007 10:13pm
Has thanked: 177 times
Been thanked: 123 times

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815252Post barneyboyz »

saynta wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 2:40pm
Devilhead wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 1:03pm
saynta wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 11:42am
degruch wrote: Thu 08 Aug 2019 9:55pm
saynta wrote: Thu 08 Aug 2019 7:51pm Get a life people and move on. Nothing to see here. Some posters are like a dog with a f****** bone.
...says the poster who raised it in the first place, and most likely dobbed on the OP. Can you tell us again what we're all supposedly saying when we use a popular nickname for our ex-choach?
Wrong again. You are making a habit of it. I didn't dob on the original poster. Can't even tell you who it was but he/she wasn't the only one,

According to Simon, the original author was banned. And contrary to the s*** posted on here by the bone worriers, Simon was well aware of the meaning of the very offensive term.

And while we are talking about dobers, how many times have you tried to get me banned?
You mean the one extremely obscure meaning .....the one amongst many other legitimate meanings/definitions/uses of the term

You are wrong on this one Saynta - it's completely ridiculous overkill given that 99% of the posters have used the term as a friendly fun nick without any hint of pornographic duplicity

Open your eyes Sanyta and just admit that this is a classic case of over moderation

The Confederation of Healing Organisations, The Credit Hire Organisation, Margaret Cho and some Nepalese villagers agree

Lift the Ban!!

I call bulls*** on your post. You are the one with your eyes closed.

The term wasn't being used as a" friendly fun nick without any hint of pornographic duplicity". In my view it was being used , by some, with malicious intent , hence the reason Simon banned the term.

Why would you want the ban lifted? So some moron can use it to further denigrate a sacked coach? :roll: :roll: :roll: Get real., and move on.

I have grown tired of the malicious crap printed on here about Richo these past two years and now you want me to believe it was all just a bit of fun. Yeah sure it was.
Maybe some did? but I reckon most wouldn't have. I know that if I used it, it was ignorance as I've never read the damn thing (but haven't since the ban)

One could get tired of most of the crap that gets posted on here, but you do have options, we all do :wink:


St. Kilda Football Club. Going strong, since 1960 :wink:
takeaway
Club Player
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2011 5:54pm
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 368 times

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815254Post takeaway »

There is no doubt in my mind that some posters were using the term in a malicious way, in full knowledge of the UD definition. Posters also used it after forum discussion when virtually every forumite must have by then known the meaning.

The figure 99% used above would now apply to SS forumites who now KNOW the meaning. So all the more reason to maintain the ban.

Anyway, Richo has gone, why is it an issue? Some people cannot accept decisions and move on.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22436
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8355 times
Been thanked: 3703 times

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815262Post saynta »

takeaway wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 3:26pm There is no doubt in my mind that some posters were using the term in a malicious way, in full knowledge of the UD definition. Posters also used it after forum discussion when virtually every forumite must have by then known the meaning.

The figure 99% used above would now apply to SS forumites who now KNOW the meaning. So all the more reason to maintain the ban.

Anyway, Richo has gone, why is it an issue? Some people cannot accept decisions and move on.
Exactly mate. I don't know why certain posters are still angling to have the ban lifted. Doesn't make much sense to me. Some kind of warped vindication I suppose.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22436
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8355 times
Been thanked: 3703 times

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815264Post saynta »

barneyboyz wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 3:16pm
saynta wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 2:40pm
Devilhead wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 1:03pm
saynta wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 11:42am
degruch wrote: Thu 08 Aug 2019 9:55pm
saynta wrote: Thu 08 Aug 2019 7:51pm Get a life people and move on. Nothing to see here. Some posters are like a dog with a f****** bone.
...says the poster who raised it in the first place, and most likely dobbed on the OP. Can you tell us again what we're all supposedly saying when we use a popular nickname for our ex-choach?
Wrong again. You are making a habit of it. I didn't dob on the original poster. Can't even tell you who it was but he/she wasn't the only one,

According to Simon, the original author was banned. And contrary to the s*** posted on here by the bone worriers, Simon was well aware of the meaning of the very offensive term.

And while we are talking about dobers, how many times have you tried to get me banned?
You mean the one extremely obscure meaning .....the one amongst many other legitimate meanings/definitions/uses of the term

You are wrong on this one Saynta - it's completely ridiculous overkill given that 99% of the posters have used the term as a friendly fun nick without any hint of pornographic duplicity

Open your eyes Sanyta and just admit that this is a classic case of over moderation

The Confederation of Healing Organisations, The Credit Hire Organisation, Margaret Cho and some Nepalese villagers agree

Lift the Ban!!

I call bulls*** on your post. You are the one with your eyes closed.

The term wasn't being used as a" friendly fun nick without any hint of pornographic duplicity". In my view it was being used , by some, with malicious intent , hence the reason Simon banned the term.

Why would you want the ban lifted? So some moron can use it to further denigrate a sacked coach? :roll: :roll: :roll: Get real., and move on.

I have grown tired of the malicious crap printed on here about Richo these past two years and now you want me to believe it was all just a bit of fun. Yeah sure it was.
Maybe some did? but I reckon most wouldn't have. I know that if I used it, it was ignorance as I've never read the damn thing (but haven't since the ban)

One could get tired of most of the crap that gets posted on here, but you do have options, we all do :wink:
I said " by some" . I am well aware it was a small minority.


User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7922
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 122 times
Been thanked: 1082 times

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815265Post Devilhead »

takeaway wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 3:26pm There is no doubt in my mind that some posters were using the term in a malicious way, in full knowledge of the UD definition. Posters also used it after forum discussion when virtually every forumite must have by then known the meaning.

The figure 99% used above would now apply to SS forumites who now KNOW the meaning. So all the more reason to maintain the ban.

Anyway, Richo has gone, why is it an issue? Some people cannot accept decisions and move on.
Cause to be held ransom by some bored 13yo kid living in eastern Arkansas making up stupid definitions on UD is ridiculously inane and stupid

Do you think the legitimate businesses that I provided links to would change their names/nicks due to this obscure UD posting?

If someone uses the term in a duplicitous way then delete the post and ban them .... if not let it be


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22436
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8355 times
Been thanked: 3703 times

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815267Post saynta »

Devilhead wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 4:22pm
takeaway wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 3:26pm There is no doubt in my mind that some posters were using the term in a malicious way, in full knowledge of the UD definition. Posters also used it after forum discussion when virtually every forumite must have by then known the meaning.

The figure 99% used above would now apply to SS forumites who now KNOW the meaning. So all the more reason to maintain the ban.

Anyway, Richo has gone, why is it an issue? Some people cannot accept decisions and move on.
Cause to be held ransom by some bored 13yo kid living in eastern Arkansas making up stupid definitions on UD is ridiculously inane and stupid

Do you think the legitimate businesses that I provided links to would change their names/nicks due to this obscure UD posting?

If someone uses the term in a duplicitous way then delete the post and ban them .... if not let it be
How the f*** did you arrive at the conclusion that " some bored 13yo kid living in eastern Arkansas making up stupid definitions on UD" was the origin of a very offensive phrase. You are just making a wild assumption ffs.

Anyway the phrase is banned here, your businnesses can do whatever thy want apart from using that term here. :roll: :roll: :roll:


User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7922
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 122 times
Been thanked: 1082 times

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815282Post Devilhead »

saynta wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 4:50pm
Devilhead wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 4:22pm
takeaway wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 3:26pm There is no doubt in my mind that some posters were using the term in a malicious way, in full knowledge of the UD definition. Posters also used it after forum discussion when virtually every forumite must have by then known the meaning.

The figure 99% used above would now apply to SS forumites who now KNOW the meaning. So all the more reason to maintain the ban.

Anyway, Richo has gone, why is it an issue? Some people cannot accept decisions and move on.
Cause to be held ransom by some bored 13yo kid living in eastern Arkansas making up stupid definitions on UD is ridiculously inane and stupid

Do you think the legitimate businesses that I provided links to would change their names/nicks due to this obscure UD posting?

If someone uses the term in a duplicitous way then delete the post and ban them .... if not let it be
How the f*** did you arrive at the conclusion that " some bored 13yo kid living in eastern Arkansas making up stupid definitions on UD" was the origin of a very offensive phrase. You are just making a wild assumption ffs.

Anyway the phrase is banned here, your businnesses can do whatever thy want apart from using that term here. :roll: :roll: :roll:
Seriously!!

It is likely to be some idiot teen or the CEO of Merriam-Webster?

My point is the person who made up the ridiculous definition is more than likely to be a bored insignificant nobody - someone it seems that you and few others on here take quite seriously which is laughable in itself.... you know cause someone who fabricates obscure terms for far fetched ridiculous actions should be exalted

BTW Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson, Greg "The Hammer" Valentine & Jim "The Anvil" Neihardt also agree with me


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22436
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8355 times
Been thanked: 3703 times

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815288Post saynta »

Devilhead wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 5:29pm
saynta wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 4:50pm
Devilhead wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 4:22pm
takeaway wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 3:26pm There is no doubt in my mind that some posters were using the term in a malicious way, in full knowledge of the UD definition. Posters also used it after forum discussion when virtually every forumite must have by then known the meaning.

The figure 99% used above would now apply to SS forumites who now KNOW the meaning. So all the more reason to maintain the ban.

Anyway, Richo has gone, why is it an issue? Some people cannot accept decisions and move on.
Cause to be held ransom by some bored 13yo kid living in eastern Arkansas making up stupid definitions on UD is ridiculously inane and stupid

Do you think the legitimate businesses that I provided links to would change their names/nicks due to this obscure UD posting?

If someone uses the term in a duplicitous way then delete the post and ban them .... if not let it be
How the f*** did you arrive at the conclusion that " some bored 13yo kid living in eastern Arkansas making up stupid definitions on UD" was the origin of a very offensive phrase. You are just making a wild assumption ffs.

Anyway the phrase is banned here, your businnesses can do whatever thy want apart from using that term here. :roll: :roll: :roll:
Seriously!!

It is likely to be some idiot teen or the CEO of Merriam-Webster?

My point is the person who made up the ridiculous definition is more than likely to be a bored insignificant nobody - someone it seems that you and few others on here take quite seriously which is laughable in itself.... you know cause someone who fabricates obscure terms for far fetched ridiculous actions should be exalted

BTW Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson, Greg "The Hammer" Valentine & Jim "The Anvil" Neihardt also agree with me
Yawn. Talk to Simon. He was the one who banned the phrase, not me ffs.


Special
Club Player
Posts: 639
Joined: Sat 27 Apr 2019 9:30pm
Has thanked: 77 times
Been thanked: 112 times

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815369Post Special »

Someone cried to Mummy and said it’s in the UD.

Mummy learnt something as did most of us on here and made shyte up on the run to suit an agenda.

I agree it’s madness but we are all forbidden to financially contribute to this site so have been blocked out of having real say.


Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6492
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1158 times
Been thanked: 442 times

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815373Post Jacks Back »

I always preferred The Milky Bar Kid for Mr Vanilla.


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
User avatar
degruch
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8948
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
Location: Croydonia
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815374Post degruch »

saynta wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 11:42am
degruch wrote: Thu 08 Aug 2019 9:55pm
saynta wrote: Thu 08 Aug 2019 7:51pm Get a life people and move on. Nothing to see here. Some posters are like a dog with a f****** bone.
...says the poster who raised it in the first place, and most likely dobbed on the OP. Can you tell us again what we're all supposedly saying when we use a popular nickname for our ex-choach?
Wrong again. You are making a habit of it. I didn't dob on the original poster. Can't even tell you who it was but he/she wasn't the only one,

According to Simon, the original author was banned. And contrary to the s*** posted on here by the bone worriers, Simon was well aware of the meaning of the very offensive term.

And while we are talking about dobbers, how many times have you tried to get me banned?
Try? Have I? Do I need to try? You've more than qualified for a life ban...rules are rules, you brought the supposed term to the forum, and the ban should be issued.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22436
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8355 times
Been thanked: 3703 times

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815375Post saynta »

degruch wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 10:57pm
saynta wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 11:42am
degruch wrote: Thu 08 Aug 2019 9:55pm
saynta wrote: Thu 08 Aug 2019 7:51pm Get a life people and move on. Nothing to see here. Some posters are like a dog with a f****** bone.
...says the poster who raised it in the first place, and most likely dobbed on the OP. Can you tell us again what we're all supposedly saying when we use a popular nickname for our ex-choach?
Wrong again. You are making a habit of it. I didn't dob on the original poster. Can't even tell you who it was but he/she wasn't the only one,

According to Simon, the original author was banned. And contrary to the s*** posted on here by the bone worriers, Simon was well aware of the meaning of the very offensive term.

And while we are talking about dobbers, how many times have you tried to get me banned?
Try? Have I? Do I need to try? You've more than qualified for a life ban...rules are rules, you brought the supposed term to the forum, and the ban should be issued.
Crap. You are trying to rewrite history.


User avatar
degruch
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8948
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
Location: Croydonia
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815377Post degruch »

saynta wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 10:59pm
degruch wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 10:57pm
saynta wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 11:42am
degruch wrote: Thu 08 Aug 2019 9:55pm
saynta wrote: Thu 08 Aug 2019 7:51pm Get a life people and move on. Nothing to see here. Some posters are like a dog with a f****** bone.
...says the poster who raised it in the first place, and most likely dobbed on the OP. Can you tell us again what we're all supposedly saying when we use a popular nickname for our ex-choach?
Wrong again. You are making a habit of it. I didn't dob on the original poster. Can't even tell you who it was but he/she wasn't the only one,

According to Simon, the original author was banned. And contrary to the s*** posted on here by the bone worriers, Simon was well aware of the meaning of the very offensive term.

And while we are talking about dobbers, how many times have you tried to get me banned?
Try? Have I? Do I need to try? You've more than qualified for a life ban...rules are rules, you brought the supposed term to the forum, and the ban should be issued.
Crap. You are trying to rewrite history.
*cough* Got any proof I'm wrong? I know, I know...proofs not your thing...better to make it up and cry wolf.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22436
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8355 times
Been thanked: 3703 times

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815378Post saynta »

Special wrote: Fri 09 Aug 2019 10:46pm Someone cried to Mummy and said it’s in the UD.

Mummy learnt something as did most of us on here and made shyte up on the run to suit an agenda.

I agree it’s madness but we are all forbidden to financially contribute to this site so have been blocked out of having real say.
There were a few posters who knew the term was offensive including Simon.

If I was Simon I wouldn't take any money from you either.

Accusing Simon of making shyte up on the run is pretty offensive.

A couple of posters including you are carrying on about ths issue like two year olds who can't get their own way.

f****** pathetic really.


fugazi
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4243
Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
Location: incarnate
Has thanked: 286 times
Been thanked: 694 times

Re: Insights into the mind of ‘cho’

Post: # 1815380Post fugazi »

This thread should be closed and banished into outer space.


Nee!
Post Reply