BackFromUSA wrote: HitTheBoundary wrote:
bassoon wrote:I really don't understand the criticisms of the Moderators. Though I never had trouble with Plugger 66, it is well to remember that though we have the privlige and the right to post our opinions, etc.etc., we also have the responsibility to abide by the rules of the site. It's that simple really. If posters decide not toadied by the rules, they (eventually) forfeit their right.
The problem though, is when the rules are applied to some and not to others.
No the problem is that you and others don't read or understand the rules and like one eyed supporters are blinded by hatred of particular posters because you disagree with their views.
The rules are applied equally - we let some things slide when they are minor offences.
If that creates inconsistency - would you rather we warn for every slight breach. Almost everyone posting within this thread would be banned within a month and reached 3 bans within 6 to 12 months and be deregistered ir have their IP banned.
Is that what you all want?
It would be happy to comply!
I think the only one blinded is you, by the light shining out of your arse.
I wrote, "The problem though, is when the rules are applied to some and not to others."
You replied, "The rules are applied equally - we let some things slide when they are minor offences."
So essentially, you stated what I said was correct.
By your own admission they are not really applied equally, but rather they are applied at your discretion, yet you say I am "blinded by hatred" or "don't understand the rules".
I have faith in Kosi and St. Byron, based on their history.
I have no faith in you for the same reason.
You are ridiculously inconsistent, but at least you're consistent with that.
And when you're called on it then you say it's your discretion.
Then issue a warning.
As for your threat of warnings and bans, I am more than happy if you always fully apply the rules to me.
I am quite comfortable with my posting history and style.