Public apology to Cairnsman

The place to discuss issues with administrators and moderators. Suggestions welcome. All bans will be posted here and the banning appeals process will be held in this forum.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
Dave McNamara
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5709
Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 74 times

Re: Public apology to Cairnsman

Post: # 1498112Post Dave McNamara »

BakesFan wrote:Gotta say I agree with Grumps here..... I don't know how many mods we have on here (I'm too lazy to look it up)...but I do believe the Mods should be anonymous....eg: 'Mod 1', 'Mod 2', 'Mod 3'...... they should be allowed to post their own opinions under their 'everyday' nics without it being linked to their moderator duties.
Plus one.

Is there a reason for 'why not' that we are missing?

I do remember that one of our Mods was originally unaware of the 'green colour change' re their nick.


It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
skeptic wrote: Tue 30 Jan 2024 8:07pmCongrats to Dave McNamara - hereby dubbed the KNOWINGEST KNOW IT ALL of Saintsational
:mrgreen:
User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Public apology to Cairnsman

Post: # 1498134Post matrix »

+2


st.byron
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10598
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: North
Has thanked: 1011 times
Been thanked: 1055 times

Re: Public apology to Cairnsman

Post: # 1498147Post st.byron »

Dave McNamara wrote:
BakesFan wrote:Gotta say I agree with Grumps here..... I don't know how many mods we have on here (I'm too lazy to look it up)...but I do believe the Mods should be anonymous....eg: 'Mod 1', 'Mod 2', 'Mod 3'...... they should be allowed to post their own opinions under their 'everyday' nics without it being linked to their moderator duties.
Plus one.

Is there a reason for 'why not' that we are missing?

I do remember that one of our Mods was originally unaware of the 'green colour change' re their nick.

Interesting idea. I must say that often I don't post stuff I want to for the sake of neutrality. Am not opposed to the idea. I think though that P66 is right. It's pretty much a no win situation being a mod. Like being an umpire really. There's always going to be someone pissed off with you.


loris
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4505
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
Has thanked: 324 times
Been thanked: 397 times

Re: Public apology to Cairnsman

Post: # 1498160Post loris »

Why or why doesn't SainterK get an apology for being called a liar by cairnsman...... when it was shown by 2 mods she hadn't lied and deleted her post as cairnsman had accused her of doing?

SainterK rightfully had the courage to call him out on that. Bunk_Moreland and I correctly called him out on it in the thread a little later.

IMHO this situation would not have spiralled so had the accuser had it in him to simply admit he was wrong.

Plenty of other posters have pubically admitted they were wrong over issues when they have over stepped the line with personal attacks .................. usually then we all say - that's good he/she apologised - so let's now forget about it.

And SainterK shows class in all this mess. She denied the accusation. Then let the matter rest. SainterK is all class IMHO.


User avatar
SENsei
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7128
Joined: Mon 05 Jun 2006 8:25pm

Re: Public apology to Cairnsman

Post: # 1498197Post SENsei »

Too true Loris.

Maybe we should all vote on whether Cairnsman should apologise or not. :roll:


Poster formerly known as SENsaintsational. More wisdom. More knowledge. Less name.
User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Public apology to Cairnsman

Post: # 1498208Post matrix »

lol

still waiting


User avatar
GrumpyOne
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8163
Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2010 9:25am
Location: Kicked out of the Coffee Shop, Settlement Pub, Cranbourne

Re: Public apology to Cairnsman

Post: # 1498289Post GrumpyOne »

st.byron wrote:
Dave McNamara wrote:
BakesFan wrote:Gotta say I agree with Grumps here..... I don't know how many mods we have on here (I'm too lazy to look it up)...but I do believe the Mods should be anonymous....eg: 'Mod 1', 'Mod 2', 'Mod 3'...... they should be allowed to post their own opinions under their 'everyday' nics without it being linked to their moderator duties.
Plus one.

Is there a reason for 'why not' that we are missing?

I do remember that one of our Mods was originally unaware of the 'green colour change' re their nick.

Interesting idea. I must say that often I don't post stuff I want to for the sake of neutrality. Am not opposed to the idea. I think though that P66 is right. It's pretty much a no win situation being a mod. Like being an umpire really. There's always going to be someone pissed off with you.
Indeed there is, but with my suggestion a mod does not have to curtail what he wants to say under his own nick, as Byron has experienced above.


Australia...... Live it like we stole it....... Because we did.
User avatar
Dave McNamara
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5709
Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 74 times

Re: Public apology to Cairnsman

Post: # 1498371Post Dave McNamara »

GrumpyOne wrote:
st.byron wrote:
Dave McNamara wrote:
BakesFan wrote:Gotta say I agree with Grumps here..... I don't know how many mods we have on here (I'm too lazy to look it up)...but I do believe the Mods should be anonymous....eg: 'Mod 1', 'Mod 2', 'Mod 3'...... they should be allowed to post their own opinions under their 'everyday' nics without it being linked to their moderator duties.
Plus one.

Is there a reason for 'why not' that we are missing?

I do remember that one of our Mods was originally unaware of the 'green colour change' re their nick.

Interesting idea. I must say that often I don't post stuff I want to for the sake of neutrality. Am not opposed to the idea. I think though that P66 is right. It's pretty much a no win situation being a mod. Like being an umpire really. There's always going to be someone pissed off with you.
Indeed there is, but with my suggestion a mod does not have to curtail what he wants to say under his own nick, as Byron has experienced above.
Surely that's settled then.


It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
skeptic wrote: Tue 30 Jan 2024 8:07pmCongrats to Dave McNamara - hereby dubbed the KNOWINGEST KNOW IT ALL of Saintsational
:mrgreen:
User avatar
MCG-Unit
SS Life Member
Posts: 3117
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 4:04pm
Location: Gore
Has thanked: 403 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Re: Public apology to Cairnsman

Post: # 1499040Post MCG-Unit »

<Edited: don't know all of the facts>


No Contract, No Contact :shock:
Post Reply