Public apology to Cairnsman

The place to discuss issues with administrators and moderators. Suggestions welcome. All bans will be posted here and the banning appeals process will be held in this forum.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Re: Public apology to Cairnsman

Postby Dave McNamara » Mon 08 Sep 2014 9:06pm

BakesFan wrote:Gotta say I agree with Grumps here..... I don't know how many mods we have on here (I'm too lazy to look it up)...but I do believe the Mods should be anonymous....eg: 'Mod 1', 'Mod 2', 'Mod 3'...... they should be allowed to post their own opinions under their 'everyday' nics without it being linked to their moderator duties.

Plus one.

Is there a reason for 'why not' that we are missing?

I do remember that one of our Mods was originally unaware of the 'green colour change' re their nick.
It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hArSps&feature=player_detailpage

Matt Finnis CEO wrote:"St Kilda is an iconic part of Melbourne which has an identifiable attitude and spirit that is really aligned with where we want to take the club. It is grounded but it is aspirational, it is eclectic, everyone belongs, and we say how do we capture that as an identity? It would be a good move on so many levels for the club."
User avatar
Dave McNamara
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 5069
Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!

Re: Public apology to Cairnsman

Postby matrix » Mon 08 Sep 2014 10:20pm

+2
User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 21462
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm

Re: Public apology to Cairnsman

Postby st.byron » Mon 08 Sep 2014 10:52pm

Dave McNamara wrote:
BakesFan wrote:Gotta say I agree with Grumps here..... I don't know how many mods we have on here (I'm too lazy to look it up)...but I do believe the Mods should be anonymous....eg: 'Mod 1', 'Mod 2', 'Mod 3'...... they should be allowed to post their own opinions under their 'everyday' nics without it being linked to their moderator duties.

Plus one.

Is there a reason for 'why not' that we are missing?

I do remember that one of our Mods was originally unaware of the 'green colour change' re their nick.



Interesting idea. I must say that often I don't post stuff I want to for the sake of neutrality. Am not opposed to the idea. I think though that P66 is right. It's pretty much a no win situation being a mod. Like being an umpire really. There's always going to be someone pissed off with you.
User avatar
st.byron
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 7517
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: Mullum

Re: Public apology to Cairnsman

Postby loris » Tue 09 Sep 2014 12:27am

Why or why doesn't SainterK get an apology for being called a liar by cairnsman...... when it was shown by 2 mods she hadn't lied and deleted her post as cairnsman had accused her of doing?

SainterK rightfully had the courage to call him out on that. Bunk_Moreland and I correctly called him out on it in the thread a little later.

IMHO this situation would not have spiralled so had the accuser had it in him to simply admit he was wrong.

Plenty of other posters have pubically admitted they were wrong over issues when they have over stepped the line with personal attacks .................. usually then we all say - that's good he/she apologised - so let's now forget about it.

And SainterK shows class in all this mess. She denied the accusation. Then let the matter rest. SainterK is all class IMHO.
loris
SS Life Member
 
Posts: 3704
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm

Re: Public apology to Cairnsman

Postby SENsei » Tue 09 Sep 2014 10:20am

Too true Loris.

Maybe we should all vote on whether Cairnsman should apologise or not. :roll:
Poster formerly known as SENsaintsational. More wisdom. More knowledge. Less name.
User avatar
SENsei
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 7126
Joined: Mon 05 Jun 2006 8:25pm

Re: Public apology to Cairnsman

Postby matrix » Tue 09 Sep 2014 11:19am

lol

still waiting
User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 21462
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm

Re: Public apology to Cairnsman

Postby GrumpyOne » Tue 09 Sep 2014 3:24pm

st.byron wrote:
Dave McNamara wrote:
BakesFan wrote:Gotta say I agree with Grumps here..... I don't know how many mods we have on here (I'm too lazy to look it up)...but I do believe the Mods should be anonymous....eg: 'Mod 1', 'Mod 2', 'Mod 3'...... they should be allowed to post their own opinions under their 'everyday' nics without it being linked to their moderator duties.

Plus one.

Is there a reason for 'why not' that we are missing?

I do remember that one of our Mods was originally unaware of the 'green colour change' re their nick.



Interesting idea. I must say that often I don't post stuff I want to for the sake of neutrality. Am not opposed to the idea. I think though that P66 is right. It's pretty much a no win situation being a mod. Like being an umpire really. There's always going to be someone pissed off with you.


Indeed there is, but with my suggestion a mod does not have to curtail what he wants to say under his own nick, as Byron has experienced above.
Australia...... Live it like we stole it....... Because we did.
User avatar
GrumpyOne
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 8163
Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2010 9:25am
Location: Kicked out of the Coffee Shop, Settlement Pub, Cranbourne

Re: Public apology to Cairnsman

Postby Dave McNamara » Tue 09 Sep 2014 6:33pm

GrumpyOne wrote:
st.byron wrote:
Dave McNamara wrote:
BakesFan wrote:Gotta say I agree with Grumps here..... I don't know how many mods we have on here (I'm too lazy to look it up)...but I do believe the Mods should be anonymous....eg: 'Mod 1', 'Mod 2', 'Mod 3'...... they should be allowed to post their own opinions under their 'everyday' nics without it being linked to their moderator duties.

Plus one.

Is there a reason for 'why not' that we are missing?

I do remember that one of our Mods was originally unaware of the 'green colour change' re their nick.



Interesting idea. I must say that often I don't post stuff I want to for the sake of neutrality. Am not opposed to the idea. I think though that P66 is right. It's pretty much a no win situation being a mod. Like being an umpire really. There's always going to be someone pissed off with you.


Indeed there is, but with my suggestion a mod does not have to curtail what he wants to say under his own nick, as Byron has experienced above.

Surely that's settled then.
It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hArSps&feature=player_detailpage

Matt Finnis CEO wrote:"St Kilda is an iconic part of Melbourne which has an identifiable attitude and spirit that is really aligned with where we want to take the club. It is grounded but it is aspirational, it is eclectic, everyone belongs, and we say how do we capture that as an identity? It would be a good move on so many levels for the club."
User avatar
Dave McNamara
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 5069
Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!

Re: Public apology to Cairnsman

Postby MCG-Unit » Fri 12 Sep 2014 5:46pm

<Edited: don't know all of the facts>
Cease and Desist notice
User avatar
MCG-Unit
SS Life Member
 
Posts: 2863
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 4:04pm
Location: Colosseum

Previous

Return to Administration Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest