These are both ins for each side.
Dumb and Dumber - should be a hoot of the conditions are messy!
Hickey vs. Stanley
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
saintspremiers
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Hickey vs. Stanley
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
-
BringBackMadDog
- Club Player
- Posts: 1953
- Joined: Thu 05 Aug 2004 9:29am
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 127 times
-
Crossy66
- Club Player
- Posts: 1080
- Joined: Fri 28 Nov 2014 5:33pm
- Has thanked: 319 times
- Been thanked: 260 times
Re: Hickey vs. Stanley
Wouldnt surprise me if Hickey doesnt play. Geelong dont have a ruckman, plus its likely to rain. If so, Battle to come in, Hickey goes out, Marshall rucks Gilbo/Acres help out i am thinking.saintspremiers wrote:These are both ins for each side.
Dumb and Dumber - should be a hoot of the conditions are messy!
-
desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10305
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 182 times
- Been thanked: 679 times
-
Joffa Burns
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7081
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
- Has thanked: 1871 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: Hickey vs. Stanley
In wet slippery conditions it will be more like watching Torvill & Dean.BringBackMadDog wrote:It won’t be a very physical contest that’s for sure.
Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
-
Linton Lodger
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 256 times
-
ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10628
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 791 times
Re: Hickey vs. Stanley
If Hickey can't beat Stanley in ruck contests and around the ground then he is career over.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
-
ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10628
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 791 times
Re: Hickey vs. Stanley
Can Oliver Hardy outplay Stanley Laurel.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
-
bigred
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11463
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
Re: Hickey vs. Stanley
Hickey should really smash him.
But he wont.
But he wont.
"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
-
ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10628
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 791 times
Re: Hickey vs. Stanley
Two weeks normally but for a St Kilda player three weeks.bigred wrote:Hickey should really smash him.
But he wont.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
-
whiskers3614
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4465
- Joined: Thu 20 May 2010 11:49pm
- Has thanked: 117 times
- Been thanked: 295 times
-
sunsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
- Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
- Has thanked: 65 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
Re: Hickey vs. Stanley
Hasn't played a game and has to be best afield
I know one thing watching Grundy burn up the ground last night
Hickey and Marshall are the closest to him on our list
Seeya
*************
*************
-
Scollop
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10228
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3237 times
- Been thanked: 2199 times
Re: Hickey vs. Stanley
This subject heading is too long, but it would be interesting to analyse;
"Geelong coaches attitude to Stanley vs. St Kilda coaches attitude to Hickey"
So, in other words, you have a playing list that has to follow the coaches instructions; trust the coach; believe in the coach etc. I have a feeling that the poor leadership from Richo has permeated into the playing group and has affected Hickey's confidence.
Who does the Saints coach think is the first option for ruck? When Longer was performing poorly, Hickey should have come into the side in 2017. The fact that Richo did not provide Hickey opportunities last year was very detrimental. When he did bring him in, it was probably due to necessity and Hickey might have been underdone and not ready. Al in all, bad coaching.
I think Chris Scott has been able to bring in players like Stanley at the right time to perform at their best. This doesn't happen accidently. You have to put faith in your players and help support thoer growth as a player.
Richo has failed to do this with Hickey
"Geelong coaches attitude to Stanley vs. St Kilda coaches attitude to Hickey"
So, in other words, you have a playing list that has to follow the coaches instructions; trust the coach; believe in the coach etc. I have a feeling that the poor leadership from Richo has permeated into the playing group and has affected Hickey's confidence.
Who does the Saints coach think is the first option for ruck? When Longer was performing poorly, Hickey should have come into the side in 2017. The fact that Richo did not provide Hickey opportunities last year was very detrimental. When he did bring him in, it was probably due to necessity and Hickey might have been underdone and not ready. Al in all, bad coaching.
I think Chris Scott has been able to bring in players like Stanley at the right time to perform at their best. This doesn't happen accidently. You have to put faith in your players and help support thoer growth as a player.
Richo has failed to do this with Hickey