at least the scumbag was not associated with the saints

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

at least the scumbag was not associated with the saints

Postby saynta » Sat 25 Nov 2017 1:06pm

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/law-or ... 8a7bc41fa8


"TROUBLED former AFL star Andrew Lovett stands accused of a terrifying attack on a woman.

The ex-Essendon player has been charged with recklessly causing injury and unlawful assault following the alleged beating in Rye on the Mornington Peninsula on August 4.

Photos of the woman’s injuries, including bruising around her neck, form part of police’s evidence."
saynta
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 5163
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm

Re: at least the scumbag was not associated with the saints

Postby Con Gorozidis » Sat 25 Nov 2017 3:29pm

Goodness me.
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 22776
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm

Re: at least the scumbag was not associated with the saints

Postby saint-stu » Sat 25 Nov 2017 3:48pm

At least the headline isn't "former St Kilda star ..."
1ac46a38
saint-stu
Club Player
 
Posts: 967
Joined: Thu 22 Nov 2007 8:27pm

Re: at least the scumbag was not associated with the saints

Postby prwilkinson » Sat 25 Nov 2017 3:51pm

saint-stu wrote:At least the headline isn't "former St Kilda star ..."


I was kind of expecting it. Hope the woman is ok.
User avatar
prwilkinson
Club Player
 
Posts: 1341
Joined: Tue 21 Sep 2010 12:17pm

Re: at least the scumbag was not associated with the saints

Postby parkeysainter » Sat 25 Nov 2017 5:23pm

Its never ok to smack up a chick. Why can't some blokes get this...unless she is trying to kill you with a steak knife or something but I'm sure one punch from a bloke would flatten the threat.

Hope she is ok. Lovett is a cockhead!
Bring back Phil Narkle's helmet into fashion
User avatar
parkeysainter
Club Player
 
Posts: 903
Joined: Thu 20 Jul 2017 2:59am

Re: at least the scumbag was not associated with the saints

Postby saynta » Sat 25 Nov 2017 5:46pm

parkeysainter wrote:Its never ok to smack up a chick. Why can't some blokes get this...unless she is trying to kill you with a steak knife or something but I'm sure one punch from a bloke would flatten the threat.

Hope she is ok. Lovett is a cockhead!



Always was. We owe those cheating bomber bastards for that one.
saynta
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 5163
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm

Re: at least the scumbag was not associated with the saints

Postby parkeysainter » Sat 25 Nov 2017 5:48pm

saynta wrote:
parkeysainter wrote:Its never ok to smack up a chick. Why can't some blokes get this...unless she is trying to kill you with a steak knife or something but I'm sure one punch from a bloke would flatten the threat.

Hope she is ok. Lovett is a cockhead!



Always was. We owe those cheating bomber bastards for that one.


Did Sheedy rort us? I reckon the Bombers knew his background and demeanor. Bastards.
Bring back Phil Narkle's helmet into fashion
User avatar
parkeysainter
Club Player
 
Posts: 903
Joined: Thu 20 Jul 2017 2:59am

Re: at least the scumbag was not associated with the saints

Postby saynta » Sat 25 Nov 2017 9:46pm

parkeysainter wrote:
saynta wrote:
parkeysainter wrote:Its never ok to smack up a chick. Why can't some blokes get this...unless she is trying to kill you with a steak knife or something but I'm sure one punch from a bloke would flatten the threat.

Hope she is ok. Lovett is a cockhead!



Always was. We owe those cheating bomber bastards for that one.


Did Sheedy rort us? I reckon the Bombers knew his background and demeanor. Bastards.


Of course he did. He and his corrupt club.

They are still laughing at us over that one.

Bastards allright.
saynta
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 5163
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm

Re: at least the scumbag was not associated with the saints

Postby skeptic » Sat 25 Nov 2017 10:07pm

I will say this for our club...

When all of that drama went down, our club straight out (officially for other reasons) sacked his ass... and this is despite the fact that he cost us pick 17 and was pbly the difference in us winning the draw GF. He was exactly what we needed.

You can bet that if he was a Pie or a Bomber, they would have paid the lady off, or intimidated her and swept the whole thing under the rug.

Have always felt a bit of pride about how that was handled
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 8739
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm

Re: at least the scumbag was not associated with the saints

Postby Moods » Sat 25 Nov 2017 10:11pm

saynta wrote:
parkeysainter wrote:
saynta wrote:
parkeysainter wrote:Its never ok to smack up a chick. Why can't some blokes get this...unless she is trying to kill you with a steak knife or something but I'm sure one punch from a bloke would flatten the threat.

Hope she is ok. Lovett is a cockhead!



Always was. We owe those cheating bomber bastards for that one.


Did Sheedy rort us? I reckon the Bombers knew his background and demeanor. Bastards.


Of course he did. He and his corrupt club.

They are still laughing at us over that one.

Bastards allright.


How caqn we blame anyone but ourselves for that debacle. He was a two bit loser and everyone knew it. He was electric fast but lazy and never featured in the top 10 of the bombers B&F. We were seduced by what he could give us and didn't look at the broader picture. We paid him miles above his true value. We were idiots. Bombers off loaded him and I would expect our club to do the same with such a loser. We sacked Gram but should have got rid of him before he lost any value. He was lazy as well as violent twds women. Cut with the same cloth
Moods
SS Life Member
 
Posts: 3547
Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm

Re: at least the scumbag was not associated with the saints

Postby Trev from the Bush » Sat 25 Nov 2017 10:29pm

Everybody bangs on about what a mistake it was to recruit Lovett.

In the whole kerfuffle, I can't remember anybody paying credit to the Club for immediately cutting him. I guess I just did.
Saint supporter since '62
Trev from the Bush
Club Player
 
Posts: 939
Joined: Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:24pm
Location: Australia

Re: at least the scumbag was not associated with the saints

Postby Drake Huggins » Sat 25 Nov 2017 11:29pm

parkeysainter wrote:
saynta wrote:
parkeysainter wrote:Its never ok to smack up a chick. Why can't some blokes get this...unless she is trying to kill you with a steak knife or something but I'm sure one punch from a bloke would flatten the threat.

Hope she is ok. Lovett is a cockhead!



Always was. We owe those cheating bomber bastards for that one.


Did Sheedy rort us? I reckon the Bombers knew his background and demeanor. Bastards.

Turd and shitty did us like a dinner. A testament to the "quality" of the characters of those two.
"Is this the right room for an argument?"
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
User avatar
Drake Huggins
Club Player
 
Posts: 486
Joined: Wed 04 Oct 2017 4:28pm
Location: The G.G. Huggins Stand

Re: at least the scumbag was not associated with the saints

Postby magnifisaint » Sat 25 Nov 2017 11:40pm

What a dog Lovett is. Of course the drug cheats wanted to move him on. Lyon is a moron for taking him on.
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 5463
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Location: Fiddling under my raincoat

Re: at least the scumbag was not associated with the saints

Postby Drake Huggins » Sat 25 Nov 2017 11:52pm

Should've listened to Roo. He was right all along.
"Is this the right room for an argument?"
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
User avatar
Drake Huggins
Club Player
 
Posts: 486
Joined: Wed 04 Oct 2017 4:28pm
Location: The G.G. Huggins Stand

Re: at least the scumbag was not associated with the saints

Postby saynta » Sun 26 Nov 2017 10:42am

Drake Huggins wrote:Should've listened to Roo. He was right all along.


Yep. The prick had form.
saynta
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 5163
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm

Re: at least the scumbag was not associated with the saints

Postby parkeysainter » Sun 26 Nov 2017 11:40am

What did Roo say?
Bring back Phil Narkle's helmet into fashion
User avatar
parkeysainter
Club Player
 
Posts: 903
Joined: Thu 20 Jul 2017 2:59am

Re: at least the scumbag was not associated with the saints

Postby skeptic » Sun 26 Nov 2017 12:00pm

I always felt that we paid way overs to get him too

Regardless of what happened off-field - who the hell thought he was worth pick 17. Second rounder at best
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 8739
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm

Re: at least the scumbag was not associated with the saints

Postby magnifisaint » Sun 26 Nov 2017 12:48pm

skeptic wrote:I always felt that we paid way overs to get him too

Regardless of what happened off-field - who the hell thought he was worth pick 17. Second rounder at best

That's 16
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 5463
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Location: Fiddling under my raincoat

Re: at least the scumbag was not associated with the saints

Postby skeptic » Sun 26 Nov 2017 2:59pm

magnifisaint wrote:
skeptic wrote:I always felt that we paid way overs to get him too

Regardless of what happened off-field - who the hell thought he was worth pick 17. Second rounder at best

That's 16


Well that’s worse
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 8739
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm

Re: at least the scumbag was not associated with the saints

Postby skeptic » Sun 26 Nov 2017 3:02pm

And at pick 20 that year was one N. Fyfe
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 8739
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm

Re: at least the scumbag was not associated with the saints

Postby skeptic » Sun 26 Nov 2017 3:03pm

And at pick 20 that year was one N. Fyfe
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 8739
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm


Return to Saintsational Fan Forum (open to all ages)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Darth Vader, hAyES, one point, parkeysainter, saintkid, Spinner and 29 guests