Agressive, not reckless.

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Re: Agressive, not reckless.

Postby Rosco » Fri 13 Oct 2017 7:06am

maverick wrote:
SuperDuper wrote:
maverick wrote:There are two exceptions to this.
Watts and stringer.
Both are A grade and could be elite, both are dangerous players with X factor and required development.
We could use either or both and probably get them with pick 8 and a 3rd rounder.


We could get Stringer by trading 8 to Tigers for 15 and 17 and using 15 for Stringer. Dogs would do it. Tigers would do it (they will get Naish at around 17 anyway without needng the pick so they are getting a 15 to 8 upgrade for free)

It is incredible to think that our club does not want Stringer for effectively an 8 to 17 downgrade.

I am not even saying we should do it... just that if you said that was possible 8 months ago, and that we would not do it, you would say ya must be dreamin!


We could then swap pick 17 for watts and pick 35
Meaning we get stronger and watts plus pick 35 for pick 8


But why do we need two medium sized forwards? Issues aside.
User avatar
Rosco
Club Player
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2011 5:40pm
Location: Hughesdale

Re: Agressive, not reckless.

Postby stkfc1 » Fri 13 Oct 2017 8:34am

Rosco wrote:
maverick wrote:
SuperDuper wrote:
maverick wrote:There are two exceptions to this.
Watts and stringer.
Both are A grade and could be elite, both are dangerous players with X factor and required development.
We could use either or both and probably get them with pick 8 and a 3rd rounder.


We could get Stringer by trading 8 to Tigers for 15 and 17 and using 15 for Stringer. Dogs would do it. Tigers would do it (they will get Naish at around 17 anyway without needng the pick so they are getting a 15 to 8 upgrade for free)

It is incredible to think that our club does not want Stringer for effectively an 8 to 17 downgrade.

I am not even saying we should do it... just that if you said that was possible 8 months ago, and that we would not do it, you would say ya must be dreamin!


We could then swap pick 17 for watts and pick 35
Meaning we get stronger and watts plus pick 35 for pick 8


But why do we need two medium sized forwards? Issues aside.


Yeah dont see the need. We have Membrey who's better than both of them. Also Acres can go forward.
stkfc1
Club Player
 
Posts: 567
Joined: Sat 06 Oct 2007 2:42pm

Re: Agressive, not reckless.

Postby CQ SAINT » Fri 13 Oct 2017 8:59am

Im going to be aggressive tonight with a bag of limes and a bottle of Gilbeys. We've gone from Kelly and Martin to Strangler and Watts. OMG.
CQ SAINT
Club Player
 
Posts: 446
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm

Re: Agressive, not reckless.

Postby degruch » Fri 13 Oct 2017 9:07am

CQ SAINT wrote:Im going to be aggressive tonight with a bag of limes and a bottle of Gilbeys. We've gone from Kelly and Martin to Strangler and Watts. OMG.


Yes, the general direction of discussion seems to have flipped 180 degrees since the OP...let's get reckless!
SaintPav wrote:It's a cliche now piss off you snot nose ignoramus.
User avatar
degruch
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 7692
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
Location: Sunny Doncaster

Previous

Return to Saintsational Fan Forum (open to all ages)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot], Hemi Baxter, resaintlee, St Loxton, st.byron and 24 guests