Dal says Zach Merrett should be traded to Saints for top 2 p

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6069
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 336 times
Been thanked: 1556 times

Dal says Zach Merrett should be traded to Saints for top 2 p

Post: # 1702467Post CQ SAINT »



User avatar
IluvHarvey
SS Life Member
Posts: 2609
Joined: Fri 06 Jun 2008 4:51pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 257 times

Re: Dal says Zach Merrett should be traded to Saints for top

Post: # 1702469Post IluvHarvey »

Just what he wants to see happen. Likelihood of this actually happening is 0.01%


"It only ends once. Anything that happens before that is just progress."
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22487
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8408 times
Been thanked: 3720 times

Re: Dal says Zach Merrett should be traded to Saints for top

Post: # 1702471Post saynta »

Was a joke, wont happen.

Honeychurch is an out for the doggies. We interviewed him last year but went cold on him. So hes a maybe.


CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6069
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 336 times
Been thanked: 1556 times

Re: Dal says Zach Merrett should be traded to Saints for top

Post: # 1702475Post CQ SAINT »

I began to think he was posting on this forum.


sainters85
Club Player
Posts: 386
Joined: Sat 14 Jun 2014 11:42pm
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Dal says Zach Merrett should be traded to Saints for top

Post: # 1702477Post sainters85 »

we could've just drafted Merrett instead


loris
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4516
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
Has thanked: 328 times
Been thanked: 405 times

Re: Dal says Zach Merrett should be traded to Saints for top

Post: # 1702490Post loris »

Is Dal doing a Jaxons ??????


User avatar
parkeysainter
SS Life Member
Posts: 2696
Joined: Thu 20 Jul 2017 2:59am
Location: Brighton Beach Mansion
Has thanked: 84 times
Been thanked: 177 times

Re: Dal says Zach Merrett should be traded to Saints for top

Post: # 1702491Post parkeysainter »

Lol. As if Essendon would give up a 22 year old AA that gets 30 touches a week.


Try to be a rainbow in someone's cloud

In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes and the St Kilda FC
User avatar
Drake Huggins
Club Player
Posts: 906
Joined: Wed 04 Oct 2017 4:28pm
Location: The G.G. Huggins Stand
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Dal says Zach Merrett should be traded to Saints for top

Post: # 1702493Post Drake Huggins »

parkeysainter wrote:Lol. As if Essendon would give up a 22 year old AA that gets 30 touches a week.
Given their trading track record, they'd want both our first rounders plus Billings and Gresham. No thanks to dealing with the dopers. They're still sore over us doing them over in the Carlisle/Gresham deal.


"Is this the right room for an argument?"
"I told you once."
"No, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"Listen, an argument isn't just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says, it's a series of statements designed to support a particular conclusion."
"No, it isn't."
"Oh, I've had enough of this."
"No you haven't"
"Oh shut up."
User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10631
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 792 times

Re: Dal says Zach Merrett should be traded to Saints for top

Post: # 1702498Post ace »

parkeysainter wrote:Lol. As if Essendon would give up a 22 year old AA that gets 30 touches a week.
Picks 7 and 8, thats 1644 + 1551 points = 3195 points.
Pick 1 is worth 3000 points. Pick 56 is worth 194 points.
No way.
We would be better trading those two picks for pick no 1 and not letting Trout waste it on a kid with diabetes and fine character.

Essendon has pick 11 worth 1329 points.
If we got that in return it would reduce the cost to 1866 points or pick 5.
But I can't see the Dildo agreeing to that.

Essendon has pick 28 worth 729 points but will certainly be worth less after free agency compensations.
Before that happens it would make the trade worth 2518 points or pick no 2.
After free agency it would be between picks 1 and 2.
That should be too expensive for us.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
Post Reply