the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened ones

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened ones

Postby SuperDuper » Wed 04 Oct 2017 3:30am

Please keep all Jaxons spleen venting in this thread

Pat yourselves on the back for being skeptics. Congratulate yourselves for not blindly beleiving everything you read on an internet fan forum. Talk about how clever you are compared to all those others who like to hear from Jaxons. Tell each other that you wish Jaxons would nick-off! Tell yourselves how Jaxons must be attention seeking, regardless of how unassuming all his posts have been. Invent a mythical Jaxons that is a total big noting ass and then tear him down to size like he deserves!

In essence, go for it and knock yourselves out!!!!



----checking out of this thread for good-----
SuperDuper
Club Player
 
Posts: 924
Joined: Sun 25 Mar 2012 9:45pm

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby MickThomas » Wed 04 Oct 2017 4:30am

Speaking for myself and WW/GPH,
we both believe that Jaxons is an 83 year old lady
who lives in Seaford, and walks her grizzled old labrador past the club HQ every second day...
She gets her grand-daughter to post on here.
The reason she's quit the forum is...
The club is going home to Linton St and she'll be walking past spinifex and tumbleweeds at East Rd, there'll be weeds growing through the pavers, broken windows,
and only the ghosts of the couldabeens whispering to her "I coulda been a contender!!!"
Con Gorozides isn't a troll, he has opinions like we all do.
If you disagree with him and attack personally
rather than use logic and facts,
you're either lazy or your comment can be viewed as trolling.
MickThomas
Club Player
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Mon 21 Aug 2017 1:23am
Location: Doncaster, Victoria

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby Jacks Back » Wed 04 Oct 2017 7:12am

After a post by someone saying he was the janitor at Seaford I pictured him as:

Image
As president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
Jacks Back
SS Life Member
 
Posts: 3887
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby SaintPav » Wed 04 Oct 2017 7:14am

What's Skeptic got to do with Jaxons?

What happened to Haynes?

Simple question.
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 9670
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby degruch » Wed 04 Oct 2017 8:21am

Where's the official "I Don't Give a s***" thread then?
SaintPav wrote:It's a cliche now piss off you snot nose ignoramus.
User avatar
degruch
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 7713
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
Location: Sunny Doncaster

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby Con Gorozidis » Wed 04 Oct 2017 8:29am

Anyone who get over 50% strike rate on pre-news is legit imo.
He is tracking at around 80%.
Noone should expect 100%.
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 22642
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby Vazelos » Wed 04 Oct 2017 9:23am

I had one skirmish with him when he smashed me that I dont know football over Dunstan and was adamant one of my ITK posts from a very strong source wasnt correct but no one should be bullied in here.... If indeed he is giving some good information then I hope he stays...
At one stage he was given exalted status by people but has been cut down to size pretty quickly...
You dont get away with much in this forum if you work in the ITK space.....
Vazelos
Club Player
 
Posts: 717
Joined: Sun 12 Sep 2010 1:17am

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby Vazelos » Wed 04 Oct 2017 9:24am

I had one skirmish with him when he smashed me that I dont know football over Dunstan and was adamant one of my ITK posts from a very strong source wasnt correct but no one should be bullied in here.... If indeed he is giving some good information then I hope he stays...
At one stage he was given exalted status by people but has been cut down to size pretty quickly...
You dont get away with much in this forum if you work in the ITK space.....

I did mention that if he was getting it from the club then he was doing someone a disservice by putting it on here...

There is stuff I find out that I just wont post, you just cannot if you hear certain things....
Vazelos
Club Player
 
Posts: 717
Joined: Sun 12 Sep 2010 1:17am

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby mightysainters » Wed 04 Oct 2017 9:36am

This is ridiculous.. bunch of idiots
User avatar
mightysainters
Club Player
 
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue 16 Mar 2004 2:21pm

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby Long Term Injury » Wed 04 Oct 2017 9:39am

SaintPav wrote:What's Skeptic got to do with Jaxons?

What happened to Haynes?

Simple question.


No idea, but as a wild guess I could foresee us trading hickey for him and Jaxons has made a point of not commenting on actual players. Or, it could be that the winds have changed
Long Term Injury
Club Player
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Wed 12 Aug 2015 2:19am

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby prwilkinson » Wed 04 Oct 2017 11:11am

Con Gorozidis wrote:Anyone who get over 50% strike rate on pre-news is legit imo.
He is tracking at around 80%.
Noone should expect 100%.


Yep. There really are some genuine 'eat your own' supporters out there.
User avatar
prwilkinson
Club Player
 
Posts: 1336
Joined: Tue 21 Sep 2010 12:17pm

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby parkeysainter » Wed 04 Oct 2017 3:14pm

God, thought I finished high school a very long time ago. This is the word thread I've ever seen in my short stay. :P
Bring back Phil Narkle's helmet into fashion
User avatar
parkeysainter
Club Player
 
Posts: 774
Joined: Thu 20 Jul 2017 2:59am

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby parkeysainter » Wed 04 Oct 2017 3:44pm

SaintPav wrote:What's Skeptic got to do with Jaxons?

What happened to Haynes?

Simple question.


Haynes?! Say again?! Isn't he from GWS? Think he was a Frankston boy originally.
Bring back Phil Narkle's helmet into fashion
User avatar
parkeysainter
Club Player
 
Posts: 774
Joined: Thu 20 Jul 2017 2:59am

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby Sainternist » Wed 04 Oct 2017 4:54pm

I've nothing against Jaxons, it's just the nauseating sycophants on this forum who all get in a circle around him for a bukkake that is off-putting.
The Saints are looking prettay...prettay...prettay...PRETTY GOOD!
Image
User avatar
Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 9478
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby Myron Gaines » Wed 04 Oct 2017 5:20pm

Shut the whole site down its cooked
Myron Gaines
Club Player
 
Posts: 313
Joined: Tue 15 Mar 2016 7:03pm

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby Vazelos » Wed 04 Oct 2017 5:23pm

If he is that strong with the ITK space then he is someone you want to stay in this forum.
He should not be smashed but at the same time he should not carry on like some Alpha male super star either.
I had some information via a close media friend who knew a board member well that advised me on some news & I shared it 6 months later when it was no longer relevant & Jaxons dismissed it like he knew better.

My guess is the following:

He is not employed in the AFL industry as he would be compromising his job.
I do not think he would be getting it from someone employed inside the club as he would be seriously jeopardizing that person's position by sharing ITK information on here.
I believe he is either a friend of a well connected players agent or someone in the media.
Either way if his mail is reasonably good that is great but that does not make him a messiah or everything he says is 100% correct or that other people don't have strong connections also.

At one stage people were feeding his ego & he got a rise out of it & we were enjoying some good mail...

All good.... we all want the scoop, everyone wants to know what our club is up to and lets just keep it all in perspective.
Vazelos
Club Player
 
Posts: 717
Joined: Sun 12 Sep 2010 1:17am

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby The Fireman » Wed 04 Oct 2017 5:30pm

I wish I was famous here on SS.
User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 6544
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby st.byron » Wed 04 Oct 2017 5:31pm

Sainternist wrote:I've nothing against Jaxons, it's just the nauseating sycophants on this forum who all get in a circle around him for a bukkake that is off-putting.


Just ignore it then.
User avatar
st.byron
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 7598
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: Mullum

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby Sainternist » Wed 04 Oct 2017 5:32pm

Vazelos wrote:
My guess is the following:

He is not employed in the AFL industry as he would be compromising his job.
I do not think he would be getting it from someone employed inside the club as he would be seriously jeopardizing that person's position by sharing ITK information on here.
I believe he is either a friend of a well connected players agent or someone in the media.
Either way if his mail is reasonably good that is great but that does not make him a messiah or everything he says is 100% correct or that other people don't have strong connections also.

At one stage people were feeding his ego & he got a rise out of it & we were enjoying some good mail...

All good.... we all want the scoop, everyone wants to know what our club is up to and lets just keep it all in perspective.


+1

Couldn't have said it better myself.
The Saints are looking prettay...prettay...prettay...PRETTY GOOD!
Image
User avatar
Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 9478
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby degruch » Wed 04 Oct 2017 5:37pm

The Fireman wrote:I wish I was famous here on SS.


Well, below your avatar it says you're a legend! Tales of the Fireman will be passed down through the generations.
SaintPav wrote:It's a cliche now piss off you snot nose ignoramus.
User avatar
degruch
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 7713
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
Location: Sunny Doncaster

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby The Fireman » Wed 04 Oct 2017 5:46pm

degruch wrote:
The Fireman wrote:I wish I was famous here on SS.


Well, below your avatar it says you're a legend! Tales of the Fireman will be passed down through the generations.

hey your right..thanks mate...my chest is now firmly out.


PS is it possible to give out autographs on here ?
User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 6544
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby Sainternist » Wed 04 Oct 2017 5:47pm

Jacks Back wrote:After a post by someone saying he was the janitor at Seaford I pictured him as:

Image


That was me. Yep, Janitor Jaxons can be his nickname.
The Saints are looking prettay...prettay...prettay...PRETTY GOOD!
Image
User avatar
Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 9478
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby saint-stu » Wed 04 Oct 2017 5:51pm

Sainternist wrote:
Vazelos wrote:
My guess is the following:

He is not employed in the AFL industry as he would be compromising his job.
I do not think he would be getting it from someone employed inside the club as he would be seriously jeopardizing that person's position by sharing ITK information on here.
I believe he is either a friend of a well connected players agent or someone in the media.
Either way if his mail is reasonably good that is great but that does not make him a messiah or everything he says is 100% correct or that other people don't have strong connections also.

At one stage people were feeding his ego & he got a rise out of it & we were enjoying some good mail...

All good.... we all want the scoop, everyone wants to know what our club is up to and lets just keep it all in perspective.


+1

Couldn't have said it better myself.
Tony74 has confirmed that Jaxons is legit. Unless you think Tony74 is not too? If others have inside information, that's great! I'm sure everyone would appreciate it being shared. Just don't understand why people feel the need to sh*t on this.
1ac46a38
saint-stu
Club Player
 
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu 22 Nov 2007 8:27pm

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby MickThomas » Wed 04 Oct 2017 5:52pm

The Fireman wrote:I wish I was famous here on SS.


I thought you were famous as the first responder who assisted some
'vertically-challenged' paid performers at a Mad Monday,
who were suffering some incendiary damage

:lol: :)
Con Gorozides isn't a troll, he has opinions like we all do.
If you disagree with him and attack personally
rather than use logic and facts,
you're either lazy or your comment can be viewed as trolling.
MickThomas
Club Player
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Mon 21 Aug 2017 1:23am
Location: Doncaster, Victoria

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby skeptic » Wed 04 Oct 2017 9:08pm

I feel unfairly implicated by the use of the word skeptic
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 8685
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm

Next

Return to Saintsational Fan Forum (open to all ages)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 9 guests