the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened ones

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby loris » Wed 04 Oct 2017 9:47pm

skeptic wrote:I feel unfairly implicated by the use of the word skeptic


I’m rather skeptic you feel that way :wink:
loris
SS Life Member
 
Posts: 3806
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby skeptic » Wed 04 Oct 2017 9:51pm

loris wrote:
skeptic wrote:I feel unfairly implicated by the use of the word skeptic


I’m rather skeptic you feel that way :wink:



As always Loris, you read me like a book :D
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 8479
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby cowboy18 » Wed 04 Oct 2017 10:06pm

skeptic wrote:I feel unfairly implicated by the use of the word skeptic


You could also start "the skeptic's Jaxons thread, only for the enlightened ones"

It wouldn't be the most stupid thread on the front page at the moment.
User avatar
cowboy18
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 5785
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:05pm
Location: in my duffle coat

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby jaxons » Wed 04 Oct 2017 11:11pm

Vazelos wrote:If he is that strong with the ITK space then he is someone you want to stay in this forum.
He should not be smashed but at the same time he should not carry on like some Alpha male super star either.
I had some information via a close media friend who knew a board member well that advised me on some news & I shared it 6 months later when it was no longer relevant & Jaxons dismissed it like he knew better.

My guess is the following:

He is not employed in the AFL industry as he would be compromising his job.
I do not think he would be getting it from someone employed inside the club as he would be seriously jeopardizing that person's position by sharing ITK information on here.
I believe he is either a friend of a well connected players agent or someone in the media.
Either way if his mail is reasonably good that is great but that does not make him a messiah or everything he says is 100% correct or that other people don't have strong connections also.

At one stage people were feeding his ego & he got a rise out of it & we were enjoying some good mail...

All good.... we all want the scoop, everyone wants to know what our club is up to and lets just keep it all in perspective.



Sorry Vazelos what information did I dismiss that I apparently knew better?
jaxons
Club Player
 
Posts: 538
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 7:36pm

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby Spinner » Thu 05 Oct 2017 10:13pm

Vazelos wrote:If he is that strong with the ITK space then he is someone you want to stay in this forum.
He should not be smashed but at the same time he should not carry on like some Alpha male super star either.
I had some information via a close media friend who knew a board member well that advised me on some news & I shared it 6 months later when it was no longer relevant & Jaxons dismissed it like he knew better.

My guess is the following:

He is not employed in the AFL industry as he would be compromising his job.
I do not think he would be getting it from someone employed inside the club as he would be seriously jeopardizing that person's position by sharing ITK information on here.
I believe he is either a friend of a well connected players agent or someone in the media.
Either way if his mail is reasonably good that is great but that does not make him a messiah or everything he says is 100% correct or that other people don't have strong connections also.

At one stage people were feeding his ego & he got a rise out of it & we were enjoying some good mail...

All good.... we all want the scoop, everyone wants to know what our club is up to and lets just keep it all in perspective.


Lol I havnt used the term crybaby in a long long time... and I won't start now.
User avatar
Spinner
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 7719
Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
Location: Victoria

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby Vazelos » Sat 07 Oct 2017 3:17am

jaxons wrote:
Vazelos wrote:If he is that strong with the ITK space then he is someone you want to stay in this forum.
He should not be smashed but at the same time he should not carry on like some Alpha male super star either.
I had some information via a close media friend who knew a board member well that advised me on some news & I shared it 6 months later when it was no longer relevant & Jaxons dismissed it like he knew better.

My guess is the following:

He is not employed in the AFL industry as he would be compromising his job.
I do not think he would be getting it from someone employed inside the club as he would be seriously jeopardizing that person's position by sharing ITK information on here.
I believe he is either a friend of a well connected players agent or someone in the media.
Either way if his mail is reasonably good that is great but that does not make him a messiah or everything he says is 100% correct or that other people don't have strong connections also.

At one stage people were feeding his ego & he got a rise out of it & we were enjoying some good mail...

All good.... we all want the scoop, everyone wants to know what our club is up to and lets just keep it all in perspective.



Sorry Vazelos what information did I dismiss that I apparently knew better?


We approached Brisbane for Armitage to be swapped for Rockliff but were turned down instantly.
You told me that didn't happen. I know it did at end of last year.
Vazelos
Club Player
 
Posts: 691
Joined: Sun 12 Sep 2010 1:17am

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby Ellaandjohn » Sat 07 Oct 2017 7:29am

He will love it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ellaandjohn
Club Player
 
Posts: 67
Joined: Mon 22 May 2017 11:02pm

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby Vazelos » Sat 07 Oct 2017 10:10am

Spinner wrote:
Vazelos wrote:If he is that strong with the ITK space then he is someone you want to stay in this forum.
He should not be smashed but at the same time he should not carry on like some Alpha male super star either.
I had some information via a close media friend who knew a board member well that advised me on some news & I shared it 6 months later when it was no longer relevant & Jaxons dismissed it like he knew better.

My guess is the following:

He is not employed in the AFL industry as he would be compromising his job.
I do not think he would be getting it from someone employed inside the club as he would be seriously jeopardizing that person's position by sharing ITK information on here.
I believe he is either a friend of a well connected players agent or someone in the media.
Either way if his mail is reasonably good that is great but that does not make him a messiah or everything he says is 100% correct or that other people don't have strong connections also.

At one stage people were feeding his ego & he got a rise out of it & we were enjoying some good mail...

All good.... we all want the scoop, everyone wants to know what our club is up to and lets just keep it all in perspective.


Lol I havnt used the term crybaby in a long long time... and I won't start now.


Strange interpretation of what I wrote there, not much emotion in my post but more analysis and opinion based.
I understand the average punter gets a little carried away with ITK stuff just need to keep it real...
We are all Saints people here and good information is appreciated by all...
Vazelos
Club Player
 
Posts: 691
Joined: Sun 12 Sep 2010 1:17am

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby dragit » Sat 07 Oct 2017 11:06am

Jaxons, is the earth really round or actually flat?
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 11903
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby minneapolis » Sun 08 Oct 2017 3:29am

dragit wrote:Jaxons, is the earth really round or actually flat?


The red part is round, the white part is flat, and the black part is both. Easy.
I am committed to flexibility.
minneapolis
Club Player
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Thu 22 Apr 2004 5:35am
Location: Was:Riding an electric scooter around Shenzhen. Now:Peering thru the pollution in Peking.

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby jaxons » Sun 08 Oct 2017 11:17am

Vazelos wrote:
jaxons wrote:
Vazelos wrote:If he is that strong with the ITK space then he is someone you want to stay in this forum.
He should not be smashed but at the same time he should not carry on like some Alpha male super star either.
I had some information via a close media friend who knew a board member well that advised me on some news & I shared it 6 months later when it was no longer relevant & Jaxons dismissed it like he knew better.

My guess is the following:

He is not employed in the AFL industry as he would be compromising his job.
I do not think he would be getting it from someone employed inside the club as he would be seriously jeopardizing that person's position by sharing ITK information on here.
I believe he is either a friend of a well connected players agent or someone in the media.
Either way if his mail is reasonably good that is great but that does not make him a messiah or everything he says is 100% correct or that other people don't have strong connections also.

At one stage people were feeding his ego & he got a rise out of it & we were enjoying some good mail...

All good.... we all want the scoop, everyone wants to know what our club is up to and lets just keep it all in perspective.



Sorry Vazelos what information did I dismiss that I apparently knew better?


We approached Brisbane for Armitage to be swapped for Rockliff but were turned down instantly.
You told me that didn't happen. I know it did at end of last year.



I agree with you comments that we are all Saints people and should not attack each other.
So lets move on mate.
I will say that Armitage and Rockliff deal was never discussed at all.
Rockliff's management came to us last year and tried to see if we were interested in him.
We were not for the dollars he was on plus the trade required to get him.
Armo was never discussed as it never went that far.
jaxons
Club Player
 
Posts: 538
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 7:36pm

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby SMS » Sun 08 Oct 2017 12:23pm

So Jaxons calls everything spot on for years and there are still skeptics because 1-2 things didnt come off but were clearly in play at the time?? Joking or what??
How many years does he have to nail it before you morons accept it?
SMS
Club Player
 
Posts: 803
Joined: Fri 04 Nov 2011 3:00pm

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby Teflon » Sun 08 Oct 2017 12:35pm

The Fireman wrote:I wish I was famous here on SS.


It's overrated trust me...
I see dumb people...
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 15059
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby Vazelos » Sun 08 Oct 2017 12:49pm

jaxons wrote:
Vazelos wrote:
jaxons wrote:
Vazelos wrote:If he is that strong with the ITK space then he is someone you want to stay in this forum.
He should not be smashed but at the same time he should not carry on like some Alpha male super star either.
I had some information via a close media friend who knew a board member well that advised me on some news & I shared it 6 months later when it was no longer relevant & Jaxons dismissed it like he knew better.

My guess is the following:

He is not employed in the AFL industry as he would be compromising his job.
I do not think he would be getting it from someone employed inside the club as he would be seriously jeopardizing that person's position by sharing ITK information on here.
I believe he is either a friend of a well connected players agent or someone in the media.
Either way if his mail is reasonably good that is great but that does not make him a messiah or everything he says is 100% correct or that other people don't have strong connections also.

At one stage people were feeding his ego & he got a rise out of it & we were enjoying some good mail...

All good.... we all want the scoop, everyone wants to know what our club is up to and lets just keep it all in perspective.



Sorry Vazelos what information did I dismiss that I apparently knew better?


We approached Brisbane for Armitage to be swapped for Rockliff but were turned down instantly.
You told me that didn't happen. I know it did at end of last year.



I agree with you comments that we are all Saints people and should not attack each other.
So lets move on mate.
I will say that Armitage and Rockliff deal was never discussed at all.
Rockliff's management came to us last year and tried to see if we were interested in him.
We were not for the dollars he was on plus the trade required to get him.
Armo was never discussed as it never went that far.


Happy to move on Jaxons...
Unless your there I would not 100% know but I was told we threw Armitage'a name up for a straight swap and were quickly dismissed but take on board what you say and it's irrelevant now anyway.

I will say re Dunstan( our initial debate) that after 3 demotions last year my fears for him seemed to come to fruition but his comeback the last month gives me great hope for him. You did mention his great character and he showed that after struggling at one stage. I hope goes on with it next year.. we need all our young boys to take the next step.
Vazelos
Club Player
 
Posts: 691
Joined: Sun 12 Sep 2010 1:17am

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby Drake Huggins » Sun 08 Oct 2017 1:13pm

Dunstan's a beauty, trust me. I'm no itk, but I'm told he's very highly regarded internally, a future leader, maybe even as captain. His first year was very good and probably raised expectations too high. Second-year blues, then a significant shoulder injury slowed his progress, but getting dropped three times in a year was probably the kick up the backside he needed. I noted he was seeing a psych about his body language and demeanour earlier in the year. It seems to have done the trick. He could end up our premier inside mid.
"HAve you been told to walk 500 miles? Have you been directed to walk 500 more? You may have a claim for workplace compensation. Call the Pro Claimers now."
Drake Huggins
Club Player
 
Posts: 186
Joined: Wed 04 Oct 2017 4:28pm
Location: The G.G. Huggins Stand

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby Vazelos » Sun 08 Oct 2017 1:56pm

I'm happy to hear that we have plenty of grunt in the middle now.
Vazelos
Club Player
 
Posts: 691
Joined: Sun 12 Sep 2010 1:17am

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby jaxons » Sun 08 Oct 2017 8:54pm

Vazelos wrote:
jaxons wrote:
Vazelos wrote:
jaxons wrote:
Vazelos wrote:If he is that strong with the ITK space then he is someone you want to stay in this forum.
He should not be smashed but at the same time he should not carry on like some Alpha male super star either.
I had some information via a close media friend who knew a board member well that advised me on some news & I shared it 6 months later when it was no longer relevant & Jaxons dismissed it like he knew better.

My guess is the following:

He is not employed in the AFL industry as he would be compromising his job.
I do not think he would be getting it from someone employed inside the club as he would be seriously jeopardizing that person's position by sharing ITK information on here.
I believe he is either a friend of a well connected players agent or someone in the media.
Either way if his mail is reasonably good that is great but that does not make him a messiah or everything he says is 100% correct or that other people don't have strong connections also.

At one stage people were feeding his ego & he got a rise out of it & we were enjoying some good mail...

All good.... we all want the scoop, everyone wants to know what our club is up to and lets just keep it all in perspective.



Sorry Vazelos what information did I dismiss that I apparently knew better?


We approached Brisbane for Armitage to be swapped for Rockliff but were turned down instantly.
You told me that didn't happen. I know it did at end of last year.



I agree with you comments that we are all Saints people and should not attack each other.
So lets move on mate.
I will say that Armitage and Rockliff deal was never discussed at all.
Rockliff's management came to us last year and tried to see if we were interested in him.
We were not for the dollars he was on plus the trade required to get him.
Armo was never discussed as it never went that far.


Happy to move on Jaxons...
Unless your there I would not 100% know but I was told we threw Armitage'a name up for a straight swap and were quickly dismissed but take on board what you say and it's irrelevant now anyway.

I will say re Dunstan( our initial debate) that after 3 demotions last year my fears for him seemed to come to fruition but his comeback the last month gives me great hope for him. You did mention his great character and he showed that after struggling at one stage. I hope goes on with it next year.. we need all our young boys to take the next step.



Dunstan will be a jet trust me.
Think of some Aussie cricketers who made the Test side early on talent then got dropped and came back after some shield games and then became stars.
Dunstan had a few issues this year that affected his form and then lost some confidence.
He started to show his real talent at the end of the year and I expect him to be a star for many years.
jaxons
Club Player
 
Posts: 538
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2011 7:36pm

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby Vazelos » Mon 09 Oct 2017 1:55pm

I saw enough in the last 4 games to have some confidence in what you are saying.
I have spoken to him and he seems a strong character with good traits.
I have been critical of him but he is now entering that phase of 60-100 games 4/5 year player where we should expect a higher and consistent output.
Fingers crossed for the boy.
Vazelos
Club Player
 
Posts: 691
Joined: Sun 12 Sep 2010 1:17am

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby 35...LEGEND » Mon 09 Oct 2017 2:06pm

Teflon wrote:
The Fireman wrote:I wish I was famous here on SS.


It's overrated trust me...




:P :P :P
35...LEGEND
Club Player
 
Posts: 1143
Joined: Tue 11 Apr 2006 9:45pm
Location: Tassies Wild West

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby The_President » Mon 09 Oct 2017 3:17pm

MG & Jaxsons are the same person.
The_President
Club Player
 
Posts: 521
Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2016 8:05pm

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby parkeysainter » Mon 09 Oct 2017 3:46pm

The_President wrote:MG & Jaxsons are the same person.


A double agent is running around on Saintsational.net?
Bring back Phil Narkle's helmet into fashion
User avatar
parkeysainter
Club Player
 
Posts: 556
Joined: Thu 20 Jul 2017 2:59am

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby saynta » Wed 18 Oct 2017 10:28am

parkeysainter wrote:
The_President wrote:MG & Jaxsons are the same person.


A double agent is running around on Saintsational.net?



Well now I think he is claiming to be Bains or at least his best mate.

Complete bull crap artist if you ask me.




"' jaxons » Wed 18 Oct 8:22 am

cwrcyn wrote:
This forum is becoming less pleasant by the day. So many people just sticking the boots in constantly. The criticism of Jaxons and Ameet Bains has been deplorable...and by the usual suspects, of course. Really disappointing. It's no wonder I barely post on here these days. I notice quite a few have dropped off in recent times, too. Probably for the same reason, i suspect.



And if only you knew the link between Ameet and Jaxons it is quite ironic".
saynta
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 4874
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby degruch » Wed 18 Oct 2017 10:43am

I got slapped on the wrist for (rightly) potting a poster a few months back, yet there's effectively a whole thread for it here...

...mods awake? This is BS.
SaintPav wrote:It's a cliche now piss off you snot nose ignoramus.
User avatar
degruch
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 7693
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
Location: Sunny Doncaster

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby saynta » Wed 18 Oct 2017 10:51am

degruch wrote:I got slapped on the wrist for (rightly) potting a poster a few months back, yet there's effectively a whole thread for it here...

...mods awake? This is BS.


I agree with you there, but sadly, in my defense I was only following orders from the forum gods, or at least the guys who believe that they are in control.
saynta
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 4874
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm

Re: the Jaxons skeptics thread, only for the enlightened one

Postby SuperDuper » Wed 18 Oct 2017 11:59am

degruch wrote:I got slapped on the wrist for (rightly) potting a poster a few months back, yet there's effectively a whole thread for it here...

...mods awake? This is BS.


No.. this is a thread to keep muppets like you out of the other thread... Yet instead if using it you want to draw attention to yourself so you go to the inappropriate thread.
SuperDuper
Club Player
 
Posts: 889
Joined: Sun 25 Mar 2012 9:45pm

PreviousNext

Return to Saintsational Fan Forum (open to all ages)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: avid, Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Choppa, Darth Vader, Peastify, saintpaul74, SinCitySainter, ss1986 and 45 guests