Season of average

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3268
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 161 times
Been thanked: 491 times

Season of average

Post: # 1696336Post older saint »

Just looking at the teams results and where the opposition finished:

GWS, Richmond and WC are the only teams that we beat that finished above us

We didn't lose to a team that finished below us which is a big positive.

In theory due to the structure of the draw we finished exactly where we should have. The middle bracket of teams we played twice ( Melbourne, Richmond, WC,) we went 2-4. We also played Sydney, and North twice (2-2) .

Basically we beat who we were suppose to but weren't able to beat the teams we needed to push past.

Danger is now we fall into the Richmond, North, and others of the past decade finishing in the 9-12 bracket and treading water.

From a list perspective we have 2 players make the AA top 40. We probably have 4-5 others who have ability to make such a list in the future ( Carlisle, Billings, Steven, Membrey, Gresham) . From there we have a lot of good foot soldiers , which teams need, but too many to compete with the next level of teams.

We need A Grade Talent and to do that we must trade picks and/or players who many like what they bring to the table and will be good AFL players (Webster, Newness, Hickey) for quality in return.


The Pinch Hitters
Club Player
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun 16 Apr 2017 10:34pm

Re: Season of average

Post: # 1696577Post The Pinch Hitters »

Great analysis.


Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6508
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1173 times
Been thanked: 444 times

Re: Season of average

Post: # 1696644Post Jacks Back »

older saint wrote:Just looking at the teams results and where the opposition finished:

GWS, Richmond and WC are the only teams that we beat that finished above us

We didn't lose to a team that finished below us which is a big positive.

In theory due to the structure of the draw we finished exactly where we should have. The middle bracket of teams we played twice ( Melbourne, Richmond, WC,) we went 2-4. We also played Sydney, and North twice (2-2) .

Basically we beat who we were suppose to but weren't able to beat the teams we needed to push past.

Danger is now we fall into the Richmond, North, and others of the past decade finishing in the 9-12 bracket and treading water.

From a list perspective we have 2 players make the AA top 40. We probably have 4-5 others who have ability to make such a list in the future ( Carlisle, Billings, Steven, Membrey, Gresham) . From there we have a lot of good foot soldiers , which teams need, but too many to compete with the next level of teams.

We need A Grade Talent and to do that we must trade picks and/or players who many like what they bring to the table and will be good AFL players (Webster, Newness, Hickey) for quality in return.
Richmond finished 3rd this year. While they had a bad year last year they have played finals for 2-3 years before that (but didn't win a final). I know the joke about them finishing 9th is a tried and tested one but they haven't finished there for at least 5 years. North also played two prelims in a row.


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3268
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 161 times
Been thanked: 491 times

Re: Season of average

Post: # 1697066Post older saint »

Jacks Back wrote:
older saint wrote:Just looking at the teams results and where the opposition finished:

GWS, Richmond and WC are the only teams that we beat that finished above us

We didn't lose to a team that finished below us which is a big positive.

In theory due to the structure of the draw we finished exactly where we should have. The middle bracket of teams we played twice ( Melbourne, Richmond, WC,) we went 2-4. We also played Sydney, and North twice (2-2) .

Basically we beat who we were suppose to but weren't able to beat the teams we needed to push past.

Danger is now we fall into the Richmond, North, and others of the past decade finishing in the 9-12 bracket and treading water.

From a list perspective we have 2 players make the AA top 40. We probably have 4-5 others who have ability to make such a list in the future ( Carlisle, Billings, Steven, Membrey, Gresham) . From there we have a lot of good foot soldiers , which teams need, but too many to compete with the next level of teams.

We need A Grade Talent and to do that we must trade picks and/or players who many like what they bring to the table and will be good AFL players (Webster, Newness, Hickey) for quality in return.
Richmond finished 3rd this year. While they had a bad year last year they have played finals for 2-3 years before that (but didn't win a final). I know the joke about them finishing 9th is a tried and tested one but they haven't finished there for at least 5 years. North also played two prelims in a row.
were just using then as an example of teams which for many years were in those areas , not necessarily the last couple years. Point of the sentence is the position and consequences of that rather than the specific teams


Post Reply