Saints Back in for Dusty

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1695488Post Wayne42 »

There is no way the club will risk imploding over a Richmond player.

I hope. :shock:


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
David-Lee
Club Player
Posts: 493
Joined: Sat 10 Jun 2017 2:01pm
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 41 times

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1695494Post David-Lee »

Do people on here really think players like Kelly or Dusty are interested in a move to St Kilda?
Kelly is at a great club with years of winning to come and likely an illusive GF win.
He is on OK money but not crazy money.

Dusty would want the $ possibly more than Kelly but why leave a team that is finally in contention for a team that is no where near contention and facts are we really don't know if we will be? We hope too but is that easy to sell to a mega star?

Can we match North's big dollar deals? Why would we?

To me it seems we think because we have to first round picks we are a destination club. I had two mates really question me why we are a destination for anyone trading in! There is nothing I can say!

I said well maybe they have old mates playing at Saints ( umm very lame)...then I said we have a great up and coming group of young players...but so do Essendon, Bulldogs, Hawthorn, Carlton, Brisbane, Melbourne and so forth...wait I know! We have Alan Richardson! Of course one of me mates is a jerk and said name a rising star let's check his progress...well the truth is we are Saints see it but it has not yet truly translated to the field as predominately.

I think everyone should leave and come to St Kilda because we are the greatest club ever but it seems not too many other takers out there.


chook23
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7220
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:31am
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 134 times

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1696918Post chook23 »

The Fireman wrote:
stonecold wrote:
The Fireman wrote:is his name on the locker yet ?
He's coming, is he Fiery?????
Yep !!!!!!
Yep


saint4life
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1696930Post Con Gorozidis »

Ive said it before and Ill say it again.
Waldron is a snake oil salesman.
Absolutely full of a s***. A blow hard full of bluster.


cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4092
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1321 times

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1696931Post cwrcyn »

Junction Oval wrote:
These types of selections are what our Recruiters get paid for. Let's hope that they are good enough to get a top-notch name in, but I am not confident. Apart from Carlisle, their overall track record is not great.

Bringbackmadog responded:
Really? In last weeks side we had Steele, Roberton, Longer, Bruce, Savage, Weller, Brown and Membrey. All except for Weller have been good contributors for us this year. Membrey, Steele Bruce and Roberton are better than average players with potential A grade ability and none of them cost us anything more than pick 25 in the draft.
I would suggest that our recent trading has been very, very good


BBMD, I agree. Also, paying 1.3 million for one player is madness, and even if we got Kelly, I'd be unimpressed if we coughed up that kind of money. Using 10% of your salary cap on one player will eventually get you into strife with you salary cap and list management, not to mention pissing off other players within the club. Geelong are paying Dangerfield well under a million.


User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10627
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 791 times

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1696940Post ace »

cwrcyn wrote:Junction Oval wrote:
These types of selections are what our Recruiters get paid for. Let's hope that they are good enough to get a top-notch name in, but I am not confident. Apart from Carlisle, their overall track record is not great.

Bringbackmadog responded:
Really? In last weeks side we had Steele, Roberton, Longer, Bruce, Savage, Weller, Brown and Membrey. All except for Weller have been good contributors for us this year. Membrey, Steele Bruce and Roberton are better than average players with potential A grade ability and none of them cost us anything more than pick 25 in the draft.
I would suggest that our recent trading has been very, very good


BBMD, I agree. Also, paying 1.3 million for one player is madness, and even if we got Kelly, I'd be unimpressed if we coughed up that kind of money. Using 10% of your salary cap on one player will eventually get you into strife with you salary cap and list management, not to mention pissing off other players within the club. Geelong are paying Dangerfield well under a million.
Fremantle allegedly paying $1.4M for 6 years to Fyfe
Richmond allegedly paying $1.3M for 7 years to Martin


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30051
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 702 times
Been thanked: 1217 times

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1696945Post saintsRrising »

Con Gorozidis wrote:Ive said it before and Ill say it again.
Waldron is a snake oil salesman.
Absolutely full of a s***. A blow hard full of bluster.

He said we were chasing him. Did not say we had landed him.

PS: He was first with the news that Martin had re-signed today.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
David-Lee
Club Player
Posts: 493
Joined: Sat 10 Jun 2017 2:01pm
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 41 times

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1696991Post David-Lee »

Lol Dusty in his statement said North never mentions our name once...but we were definitely chasing him, its just he never knew about bit lol!


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30051
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 702 times
Been thanked: 1217 times

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1697019Post saintsRrising »

David-Lee wrote:Lol Dusty in his statement said North never mentions our name once...but we were definitely chasing him, its just he never knew about bit lol!
A number of clubs were chasing him. But North offered the most $$$ as they are on the slide bigtime.

It is not really that hard to follow is it?

PS On LOLs...I am not sure which is the bigger one:
- That you really expected Dusty to list every club that made an offer
- Or even bigger, that North was the only club outside of the Tiger's to put an offer to Dusty's Manager

Both are pissers!


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1697022Post dragit »

The biggest LOL is a serial troll doing a big farewell only to be back within 24 hours with the same baiting rubbish.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1697023Post Con Gorozidis »

saintsRrising wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:Ive said it before and Ill say it again.
Waldron is a snake oil salesman.
Absolutely full of a s***. A blow hard full of bluster.

He said we were chasing him. Did not say we had landed him.

PS: He was first with the news that Martin had re-signed today.
Get real.
No he wasn't.
Martin was never leaving but the Nth offer was tempting.
We were never in the running.
If calling his manager is 'chasing him in a big way' then all 17 clubs would have done this. He is the best player in the comp for crying out loud.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22479
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8405 times
Been thanked: 3716 times

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1697030Post saynta »

Rocket wrote:He won't be staying at Richmond !!! Someone is right into him, just not sure if us or North.

Sure.


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30051
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 702 times
Been thanked: 1217 times

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1697057Post saintsRrising »

Con Gorozidis wrote:
saintsRrising wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:Ive said it before and Ill say it again.
Waldron is a snake oil salesman.
Absolutely full of a s***. A blow hard full of bluster.

He said we were chasing him. Did not say we had landed him.

PS: He was first with the news that Martin had re-signed today.
Get real.
No he wasn't.
Who announced it earlier then?
Con Gorozidis wrote: Martin was never leaving but the Nth offer was tempting.
We were never in the running.
If calling his manager is 'chasing him in a big way' then all 17 clubs would have done this. He is the best player in the comp for crying out loud.
Con if you has of read my posts throughout the year you will have read that I have stated that Martin was most likely to stay at the Tigers. Even more so than Kelly is likely to stay at GWS.

That does dot mean that Martin could not have been made an offer by the Saints. And his manager certainly received offers from more than just North. North just made the biggest $$$ offer and were the only club to continually leak their offers in detail to the media.

When Walsron said what he said about the Saints and Martin, did I think that meant we woyld get him?. No, i just thought it meant that we had a made an other.

Very good players like Martin rarely leave their clubs. There has to be another factor at play. ie Dangerfield want to come home. Buddy wanted to escape the constant attention he got in Melbourne. Mitchell was being offered ridiculously low money by the Swans as they were squeezed by Buddy and Tippet and the Academy rort meant that they had young guns in Heeney and Mills to pay as well, Ablett got a godfather offer for the time with the AFL marketing bonus on top for cream, Carlisle was pissed with Dons, Hamill was pissed with Elliott.


Also with the Saints at present I have long been sceptical about the Saint's Big Fish strategy as Big Fish do not tend to join bottom or emerging teams. However none of that means that the Saints have not had a crack at players like Martin or Kelly.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
sunsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5212
Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1697058Post sunsaint »

saintsRrising wrote:
Very good players like Martin rarely leave their clubs. There has to be another factor at play. ie Dangerfield want to come home. Buddy wanted to escape the constant attention he got in Melbourne. Mitchell was being offered ridiculously low money by the Swans as they were squeezed by Buddy and Tippet and the Academy rort meant that they had young guns in Heeney and Mills to pay as well, Ablett got a godfather offer for the time with the AFL marketing bonus on top for cream, Carlisle was pissed with Dons, Hamill was pissed with Elliott.

.
Goddard?
sorry Im just feeling a little cheeky!


Seeya
*************
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30051
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 702 times
Been thanked: 1217 times

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1697072Post saintsRrising »

sunsaint wrote:
saintsRrising wrote:
Very good players like Martin rarely leave their clubs. There has to be another factor at play. ie Dangerfield want to come home. Buddy wanted to escape the constant attention he got in Melbourne. Mitchell was being offered ridiculously low money by the Swans as they were squeezed by Buddy and Tippet and the Academy rort meant that they had young guns in Heeney and Mills to pay as well, Ablett got a godfather offer for the time with the AFL marketing bonus on top for cream, Carlisle was pissed with Dons, Hamill was pissed with Elliott.

.
Goddard?
sorry Im just feeling a little cheeky!
I did say rarely. :wink:

However with BJ Saints wanted to start a rebuild with more youth and hence were happy to part with both BJ and Dal. So St Kilda did not try that hard to keep him.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Joe Bloggs
Club Player
Posts: 354
Joined: Sat 13 Dec 2014 3:06pm

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1697073Post Joe Bloggs »

Bj stated the dons had more talent than the saints ....he was right.


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18321
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1474 times
Been thanked: 1848 times

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1697077Post SaintPav »

Brian Waldron, a bona fide ITK.

:roll:


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18321
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1474 times
Been thanked: 1848 times

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1697078Post SaintPav »

Con Gorozidis wrote:
saintsRrising wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:Ive said it before and Ill say it again.
Waldron is a snake oil salesman.
Absolutely full of a s***. A blow hard full of bluster.

He said we were chasing him. Did not say we had landed him.

PS: He was first with the news that Martin had re-signed today.
Get real.
No he wasn't.
Martin was never leaving but the Nth offer was tempting.
We were never in the running.
If calling his manager is 'chasing him in a big way' then all 17 clubs would have done this. He is the best player in the comp for crying out loud.
He was definitely half way out the door. Almost gone.

His conscience probably got the better of him.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18321
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1474 times
Been thanked: 1848 times

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1697079Post SaintPav »

Joe Bloggs wrote:Bj stated the dons had more talent than the saints ....he was right.
BJ left at the end of 2012 so 90% of the list is gone. We finished bottom in 2014 so he was right.

and?


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
thejiggingsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9356
Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
Has thanked: 629 times
Been thanked: 473 times

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1697121Post thejiggingsaint »

Kelly will remain with GWS. Logical choice for him.


St Kilda forever 🔴⚪️⚫️ ( God help me)
Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11273
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1270 times
Been thanked: 431 times

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1697237Post Sainternist »

thejiggingsaint wrote:Kelly will remain with GWS. Logical choice for him.
I disagree, colleague.

Dusty set a precedent in signing a new contract with Richmond. One which Kelly isn't following.

He'll be champing at the bit to become a Saint once GWS' season reaches a conclusion.


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
thejiggingsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9356
Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
Has thanked: 629 times
Been thanked: 473 times

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1697247Post thejiggingsaint »

Sainternist wrote:
thejiggingsaint wrote:Kelly will remain with GWS. Logical choice for him.
I disagree, colleague.

Dusty set a precedent in signing a new contract with Richmond. One which Kelly isn't following.

He'll be champing at the bit to become a Saint once GWS' season reaches a conclusion.
I'd love to be proved wrong Colleague, but feel reasonably sure that Kelly will re-sign with GWS. I'm not sure that Dusty "set a precedent" , as many pundits and ( ahem ) " experts " (?!?!) had Nathan Fyffe firmly installed at the Saints, before he made his commitment to the Dockers.


St Kilda forever 🔴⚪️⚫️ ( God help me)
saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1697251Post saintspremiers »

SaintPav wrote:
Joe Bloggs wrote:Bj stated the dons had more talent than the saints ....he was right.
BJ left at the end of 2012 so 90% of the list is gone. We finished bottom in 2014 so he was right.

and?
Essendon are drug cheats and will get flogged this coming Saturday twilight.


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
MickThomas
Club Player
Posts: 631
Joined: Mon 21 Aug 2017 1:23am
Location: Doncaster, Victoria
Has thanked: 77 times
Been thanked: 33 times

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1697263Post MickThomas »

Sainternist wrote:
thejiggingsaint wrote:Kelly will remain with GWS. Logical choice for him.
I disagree, colleague.

Dusty set a precedent in signing a new contract with Richmond. One which Kelly isn't following.

He'll be champing at the bit to become a Saint once GWS' season reaches a conclusion.
then why mention "a precedent"?
if it's not going to be followed?
Then it's not really a precedent, is it


2020 was an aberration, when we travelled twice to Adelaide and won both, beat Tigers early, beat our bogey Swans. 2021 we've returned to our old ways. Damn
thejiggingsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9356
Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
Has thanked: 629 times
Been thanked: 473 times

Re: Saints Back in for Dusty

Post: # 1697270Post thejiggingsaint »

MickThomas wrote:
Sainternist wrote:
thejiggingsaint wrote:Kelly will remain with GWS. Logical choice for him.
I disagree, colleague.

Dusty set a precedent in signing a new contract with Richmond. One which Kelly isn't following.

He'll be champing at the bit to become a Saint once GWS' season reaches a conclusion.
then why mention "a precedent"?
if it's not going to be followed?
Then it's not really a precedent, is it
:? :shock: :? :roll: :| :?: :arrow: :arrow: :arrow: :arrow: :lol:


St Kilda forever 🔴⚪️⚫️ ( God help me)
Post Reply