2017 Rising Star Nominations

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

2017 Rising Star Nominations

Post: # 1689824Post Con Gorozidis »

2017 NOMINEES
Rd
1 PA Sam Powell-Pepper
2 HAW Ryan Burton
3 GEEL Brandan Parfitt
4 ESS Andrew McGrath
5 BL Eric Hipwood
6 CARL Caleb Marchbank
7 CARL Sam Petrevski-Seton
8 GWS Tim Taranto
9 COLL Tom Phillips
10 ADEL Wayne Milera
11 RICH Dan Butler
12 CARL David Cuningham
13 CARL Jack Silvagni
14 BL Hugh McCluggage
15 HAW Blake Hardwick
16 CARL Charlie Curnow
17 BL Alex Witherden
18 SYD Lewis Melican
19 RICH Jason Castagna


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: 2017 Rising Star Nominations

Post: # 1689916Post Con Gorozidis »

Crickets.
Chirp.
Chirp.


User avatar
shrodes
SS Life Member
Posts: 2596
Joined: Tue 12 Aug 2014 2:34pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 663 times
Been thanked: 327 times

Re: 2017 Rising Star Nominations

Post: # 1689938Post shrodes »

We haven't played many sub-10-game players, which I assume is your point?

I think Brandon White, Ben Long and Josh Battle may be the only eligible?

Marshall was 21 at the beginning of the year so wouldn't count.


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9240
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 129 times
Been thanked: 1162 times

Re: 2017 Rising Star Nominations

Post: # 1689939Post CURLY »

No idea what this is supposed to prove,


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: 2017 Rising Star Nominations

Post: # 1690002Post Con Gorozidis »

CURLY wrote:No idea what this is supposed to prove,
Fact check:
1. We are 11th. We are not contending.
2. We are not developing players under 22.

But hey Curls. In your mind we have an awesome list and we we would have three flags this century if it weren't for those pesky cheating umps right.


older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3248
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 159 times
Been thanked: 486 times

Re: 2017 Rising Star Nominations

Post: # 1690009Post older saint »

Con Gorozidis wrote:
CURLY wrote:No idea what this is supposed to prove,
Fact check:
1. We are 11th. We are not contending.
2. We are not developing players under 22.

But hey Curls. In your mind we have an awesome list and we we would have three flags this century if it weren't for those pesky cheating umps right.
in fairness though while we are 11th we are 1 game out of 7th and for much of the last 2 months floated between 6-10.

Many were also early draft picks which we haven't had. Gresham, Acres, Dunstan, Lonie, Sinclair, Steele, Billings, would all meet that under 22 criteria though just blooded earlier.
I do agree overall there is a slowing in the development of some , which could be players thinking they have made it, other teams putting more work not them or coaching - or a combination of above.


thejiggingsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9354
Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
Has thanked: 625 times
Been thanked: 471 times

Re: 2017 Rising Star Nominations

Post: # 1690012Post thejiggingsaint »

older saint wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:
CURLY wrote:No idea what this is supposed to prove,
Fact check:
1. We are 11th. We are not contending.
2. We are not developing players under 22.

But hey Curls. In your mind we have an awesome list and we we would have three flags this century if it weren't for those pesky cheating umps right.
in fairness though while we are 11th we are 1 game out of 7th and for much of the last 2 months floated between 6-10.

Many were also early draft picks which we haven't had. Gresham, Acres, Dunstan, Lonie, Sinclair, Steele, Billings, would all meet that under 22 criteria though just blooded earlier.
I do agree overall there is a slowing in the development of some , which could be players thinking they have made it, other teams putting more work not them or coaching - or a combination of above.
rising star nominations dont win a flag. (IMHO) ...ask Melbourne, Carlton, Richmond oh...and US!


St Kilda forever 🔴⚪️⚫️ ( God help me)
satchmo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6655
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
Location: Hotel Bastardos
Has thanked: 191 times
Been thanked: 166 times
Contact:

Re: 2017 Rising Star Nominations

Post: # 1690024Post satchmo »



*Allegedly.

Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.

You can't un-fry things.


Last Post
User avatar
shrodes
SS Life Member
Posts: 2596
Joined: Tue 12 Aug 2014 2:34pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 663 times
Been thanked: 327 times

Re: 2017 Rising Star Nominations

Post: # 1690037Post shrodes »

Brandon White vs. NOK next week in the battle for the Rising Star nomination


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: 2017 Rising Star Nominations

Post: # 1690093Post Con Gorozidis »

thejiggingsaint wrote:
older saint wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:
CURLY wrote:No idea what this is supposed to prove,
Fact check:
1. We are 11th. We are not contending.
2. We are not developing players under 22.

But hey Curls. In your mind we have an awesome list and we we would have three flags this century if it weren't for those pesky cheating umps right.
in fairness though while we are 11th we are 1 game out of 7th and for much of the last 2 months floated between 6-10.

Many were also early draft picks which we haven't had. Gresham, Acres, Dunstan, Lonie, Sinclair, Steele, Billings, would all meet that under 22 criteria though just blooded earlier.
I do agree overall there is a slowing in the development of some , which could be players thinking they have made it, other teams putting more work not them or coaching - or a combination of above.
rising star nominations dont win a flag. (IMHO) ...ask Melbourne, Carlton, Richmond oh...and US!
Dogs have had 9 RS nominees since 2012!
They also have a flag!


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: 2017 Rising Star Nominations

Post: # 1690094Post Con Gorozidis »

Bulldogs have had 9 RS nominations since 2012.


freely
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2024
Joined: Fri 07 Jun 2013 1:03pm
Has thanked: 208 times
Been thanked: 334 times

Re: 2017 Rising Star Nominations

Post: # 1690097Post freely »

Con is really the jiggster's evil twin! The weird thing is when I read con's posts I feel like Mary poppins but when I read jiggster's I'm thinking "we'll never make it!"


Beno88
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2209
Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007 11:14am
Location: Bentleigh East
Has thanked: 265 times
Been thanked: 525 times

Re: 2017 Rising Star Nominations

Post: # 1690100Post Beno88 »

We have 13 rising star nominees on our list.

Not that it means anything.

For example, Jack Newnes was never nominated, Arryn Siposs was.


thejiggingsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9354
Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
Has thanked: 625 times
Been thanked: 471 times

Re: 2017 Rising Star Nominations

Post: # 1690101Post thejiggingsaint »

freely wrote:Con is really the jiggster's evil twin! The weird thing is when I read con's posts I feel like Mary poppins but when I read jiggster's I'm thinking "we'll never make it!"


"never make" what? Colleague? :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


St Kilda forever 🔴⚪️⚫️ ( God help me)
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22439
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8359 times
Been thanked: 3703 times

Re: 2017 Rising Star Nominations

Post: # 1690102Post saynta »

Con Gorozidis wrote:
CURLY wrote:No idea what this is supposed to prove,
Fact check:
1. We are 11th. We are not contending.
2. We are not developing players under 22.

But hey Curls. In your mind we have an awesome list and we we would have three flags this century if it weren't for those pesky cheating umps right.
Well, one goal umpire at least. Plus the maggot who didn't pay a free to Schneider when he had his jumper pulled over his head


Post Reply