So let's talk about our ruck situation...

[Sainternist]

Look stone cold and Sainternist..... let me settle your argument: .... RIX ROX RUX!

Barks was good value.

Now this forum has the likes of Stonecold. Ugh... can the bar be lowered any more?

[stonecold]

Look stone cold and Sainternist..... let me settle your argument: .... RIX ROX RUX!

Barks was good value.

Now this forum has the likes of Stonecold. Ugh... can the bar be lowered any more?

You have chosen not to correct me about ruckwork, so that anwsers my question, no need to keep baiting me thanks, particularly about ruckwork, you haven't got your memo, have you???????

[thejiggingsaint]

[quote="stonecold"][quote="Sainternist"][quote="thejiggingsaint"]Look stone cold and Sainternist..... let me settle your argument: .... RIX ROX RUX! [/quote]

Barks was good value.

Now this forum has the likes of Stonecold. Ugh... can the bar be lowered any more?[/quote]

You have chosen not to correct me about ruckwork, so that anwsers my question, no need to keep baiting me thanks, particularly about ruckwork, you haven't got your memo, have you???????[/quote]

[Superboot]

Add to the mix Hickey's taps that go the advantage of the opposition, even leading to a goal, and the fact the he is bound to give away 2 or 3 silly frees.

[Sainternist]

Look stone cold and Sainternist..... let me settle your argument: .... RIX ROX RUX!

Barks was good value.

Now this forum has the likes of Stonecold. Ugh... can the bar be lowered any more?

You have chosen not to correct me about ruckwork, so that anwsers my question, no need to keep baiting me thanks, particularly about ruckwork, you haven't got your memo, have you???????

Thank you. I won't be responding to your posts in the future. Please don't respond to mine. I think it's best for both parties that we now ignore each other altogether.