Contract Shockers

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Contract Shockers

Post: # 1677055Post Con Gorozidis »

Many of us have considered Ameet Bains as some kind of savant but I feel that may end up being premature.

Sure we got lucky with the Hawks draft pick deal as they were desperate to get JOM but the following contract extensions have me going :shock:

Longer - 2018
Wright 2018
Minchington - 2018
Armitage 2019
Pierce - 2019
Dunstan - 2019
McKenzie - 2019
Last edited by Con Gorozidis on Sun 11 Jun 2017 10:41pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
White Winmar
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5014
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm

Re: Contract Shockers

Post: # 1677058Post White Winmar »

Things that make you go hmmmmmm.................Con.


I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11273
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1270 times
Been thanked: 431 times

Re: Contract Shockers

Post: # 1677068Post Sainternist »

Which of these players will still be playing AFL football after 2019?


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
Vazelos
Club Player
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun 12 Sep 2010 1:17am
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 317 times

Re: Contract Shockers

Post: # 1677084Post Vazelos »

Mckenzie is the only one that has some chance the rest won't be playing at St Kilda...
Longer is an outside chance as a back up ruckman somewhere else..


User avatar
ausfatcat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6512
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:36pm
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 95 times

Re: Contract Shockers

Post: # 1677098Post ausfatcat »

Only Mckenzie and Pierce seem the bad ones there, the rest should have next year. Far from shockers Dunston at 2019 ain't great but not bad either but put into context of clubs circling at the time of there resigning's. Armo is no prob a great player who will come back.


User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7671
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 532 times

Re: Contract Shockers

Post: # 1677100Post magnifisaint »

What a reactionary thread


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
mr six o'clock
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4237
Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006 1:05am
Has thanked: 42 times
Been thanked: 231 times

Re: Contract Shockers

Post: # 1677103Post mr six o'clock »

magnifisaint wrote:What a reactionary thread
Yes
And they would be performance based


In red white and black from 73
User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7890
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1692 times
Been thanked: 787 times

Re: Contract Shockers

Post: # 1677104Post WellardSaint »

Wright is a bit of :shock:
because he started in 2013, and has just been in and out,
he's had mostly VFL games, and only a handful of senior appearances.
Someone at the club has seen something in him and figured
that he might come good.

Maybe contracts are structured in that way so they can plan 2 and 3 years ahead
and know exactly where they stand re salary cap.
It's not about how much promise they have, it's how much you're paying in total.
Just forward planning/budgeting/forecasts

I really don't see a problem.


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7671
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 532 times

Re: Contract Shockers

Post: # 1677115Post magnifisaint »

mr six o'clock wrote:
magnifisaint wrote:What a reactionary thread
Yes
And they would be performance based
Hindsight is a beautiful thing. What about the Giants today, how's Freo going? If you're flat you will be spanked.


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Contract Shockers

Post: # 1677120Post Con Gorozidis »

magnifisaint wrote:What a reactionary thread

Wright is 23. Dunstan 22 going on 32. Minch 23, Longer 24, Pierce 22, Armo 29 and injured.
If Armo gets his body right then he might still be good in 2018/19 but that is a big IF at this stage. The rest arent going to improve much and just arent AFL standard. Simple as that.

The only one who might still be ok is McKenzie (21) and that is looking 50:50 at this point. Still absolutely no need to give him such a long contract. I am sure he would have taken a contract until 2018 happily. Not like he has offers lining up. Has not established or proved himself at AFL level at all. Why give him until 2019? Seems ridiculous on form shown.


User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7890
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1692 times
Been thanked: 787 times

Re: Contract Shockers

Post: # 1677122Post WellardSaint »

Con Gorozidis wrote:
magnifisaint wrote:What a reactionary thread

Wright is 23. Dunstan 22 going on 32. Minch 23, Longer 24, Pierce 22, Armo 29 and injured.
If Armo gets healthy then he might be ok in 2018/19 but that is a big IF at this stage. The rest arent going to improve much and just arent AFL standard. Simple as that.

The only one who might still be ok is McKenzie (21) and that is looking 50:50 at this point. Still absolutely no need to give him such a long contract. I am sure he would have taken a contract until 2018 happily. Not like he has offers lining up. Has not established or proved himself at AFL level at all. Why give him until 2019? Seems ridiculous on form shown.
They might want to secure players, not so much to keep the players happy, but so they can look on their database and know exactly where the list is
in terms of who can we delist this year, next year, and 2019.
The fringe players will just play Zebs until their contracts run out.
A contract doesn't mean the club thinks those bods are destined to play many senior games.
It's just bums on seats, basically.
If we have to delist 4 each year (is that right?)
contracts ending this year are
Sinclair
Savage
Rooey
Joey
Gilbo
Lonie
Holmes

Marshall (rookie?)
Last edited by WellardSaint on Mon 12 Jun 2017 2:12am, edited 1 time in total.


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Contract Shockers

Post: # 1677125Post Con Gorozidis »

WellardSaint wrote:
They might want to secure players, not so much to keep the players happy, but so they can look on their database and know exactly where the list is
in terms of who can we delist this year, next year, and 2019.
The fringe players will just play Zebs until their contracts run out.
A contract doesn't mean the club thinks those bods are destined to play many senior games.
It's just bums on seats, basically.
I would like to see that as our logo or marketing slagn for next year's membership drive

ST KILDA FC
Bums on Seats
Since 1873


User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7890
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1692 times
Been thanked: 787 times

Re: Contract Shockers

Post: # 1677128Post WellardSaint »

Con Gorozidis wrote:
WellardSaint wrote:
They might want to secure players, not so much to keep the players happy, but so they can look on their database and know exactly where the list is
in terms of who can we delist this year, next year, and 2019.
The fringe players will just play Zebs until their contracts run out.
A contract doesn't mean the club thinks those bods are destined to play many senior games.
It's just bums on seats, basically.
I would like to see that as our logo or marketing slogan for next year's membership drive

ST KILDA FC
Bums on Seats
Since 1873
:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Contract Shockers

Post: # 1677156Post dragit »

Con Gorozidis wrote:Many of us have considered Ameet Bains as some kind of savant but I feel that may end up being premature.

Sure we got lucky with the Hawks draft pick deal as they were desperate to get JOM but the following contract extensions have me going :shock:

Longer - 2018
Wright 2018
Minchington - 2018
Armitage 2019
Pierce - 2019
Dunstan - 2019
McKenzie - 2019
I don't mind most of those TBH...

Longer needed to be locked away to keep his trade value up

Wright looks incredibly unlikely of making it long term.

I like Minch but it appears richobdirsnt rate him, which is a bad sign.

Arno he'll play more good football yet

Pierce - not sure about that contract, how many years can you develop a player for when there are only 40 spots on the list? He needs to show something this year.

Dunstan & Mckenzie - both worth persisting with.


User avatar
The Recruit
Club Player
Posts: 911
Joined: Tue 12 May 2015 12:50am
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 118 times

Re: Contract Shockers

Post: # 1677204Post The Recruit »

Sinclair
Savage GONE
Rooey
Joey GONE
Gilbo
Lonie
Holmes GONE
Dempster GONE

Those that are contracts to 2019 will be fine.
Dunstan can play, Longer is trade bait, wright is a very good 21-22nd player...tough and quick. Minchington the only one that is dodgy....Armo looks like a bad one as well but who would have thought he would have such a bad run with his body


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Contract Shockers

Post: # 1677208Post Con Gorozidis »

The Recruit wrote:Sinclair
Savage GONE
Rooey
Joey GONE
Gilbo
Lonie
Holmes GONE
Dempster GONE

Those that are contracts to 2019 will be fine.
Dunstan can play, Longer is trade bait, wright is a very good 21-22nd player...tough and quick. Minchington the only one that is dodgy....Armo looks like a bad one as well but who would have thought he would have such a bad run with his body
Wright is quick and tough yes......but he is 23 and simply cannot get a kick even in the VFL.
How does that make him a 'very good' 21-22nd player? His inability to get a kick at VFL level is a serious concern. At 23 he should be getting over 25 in the VFL most weeks. He struggles to get 10.

I think he is in the wrong sport and should switch to UFC/MMA.


User avatar
Joffa Burns
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7081
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
Has thanked: 1871 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: Contract Shockers

Post: # 1677215Post Joffa Burns »

I think questioning these contracts asks more questions about player development than it does about contracts.
Would you have questioned this at the time they were signed or applauded signing up the future?

The fact they have not come on as expected poses the question IMO


Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Contract Shockers

Post: # 1677232Post Con Gorozidis »

Joffa Burns wrote:I think questioning these contracts asks more questions about player development than it does about contracts.
Would you have questioned this at the time they were signed or applauded signing up the future?

The fact they have not come on as expected poses the question IMO
Seems to me a disconnect between the perception of the player and the player's actual performance.
Is the footy dept saying to the contract team 'this guy is a gun'. Maybe the footy dept are over rating our own which is not hard to do when you spend so much time looking internally.
We were all told Longer was going to be a star this year based merely on a pre-season training campaign.


Post Reply