Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby st.byron » Fri 19 May 2017 5:11pm

The user nics lennyhaze and Jackstevo have been permanently banned.

There is enough evidence to leave the mods in no doubt that both of these nics are usernames on the forum of the poster previously known as Plugger66.

That poster was previously permanently banned from posting in the forum. Creating a new username does not give a banned poster the right to continue posting on the forum.

The mods also take note of a poll posted on the forum in February 2017 under the heading, "Should Plugger66 be re-instated?" From a total of 94 responses, 63% of forum members voted "no".

Accordingly the above named usernames have been permanently banned.
User avatar
st.byron
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 7496
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: Netanya

Re: Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby dragit » Fri 19 May 2017 5:36pm

st.byron wrote:The mods also take note of a poll posted on the forum in February 2017 under the heading, "Should Plugger66 be re-instated?" From a total of 94 responses, 63% of forum members voted "no".

Fair enough that you would re-ban a poster who is meant to be permanently banned, however I fail to see the relevance of citing a popularity poll… unless we are going to ban other posters who aren't popular?

That's not how it works surely?
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 11497
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am

Re: Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby Viking3 » Fri 19 May 2017 5:42pm

dragit wrote:
st.byron wrote:The mods also take note of a poll posted on the forum in February 2017 under the heading, "Should Plugger66 be re-instated?" From a total of 94 responses, 63% of forum members voted "no".

Fair enough that you would re-ban a poster who is meant to be permanently banned, however I fail to see the relevance of citing a popularity poll… unless we are going to ban other posters who aren't popular?

That's not how it works surely?


You are right Dragit, but don't call him surely! :wink:
Give me one flag & I'll go to my grave a happy man.
Viking3
Club Player
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Mon 04 Sep 2006 10:21am
Location: McKinnon

Re: Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby Dave McNamara » Fri 19 May 2017 6:03pm

http://www.saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=92665&p=1671277#p1671271

Jackstevo can't be Pluggsy. This is getting all cereal.
It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hArSps&feature=player_detailpage

Matt Finnis CEO wrote:"St Kilda is an iconic part of Melbourne which has an identifiable attitude and spirit that is really aligned with where we want to take the club. It is grounded but it is aspirational, it is eclectic, everyone belongs, and we say how do we capture that as an identity? It would be a good move on so many levels for the club."
User avatar
Dave McNamara
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 5062
Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!

Re: Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby st.byron » Fri 19 May 2017 6:07pm

dragit wrote:
st.byron wrote:The mods also take note of a poll posted on the forum in February 2017 under the heading, "Should Plugger66 be re-instated?" From a total of 94 responses, 63% of forum members voted "no".

Fair enough that you would re-ban a poster who is meant to be permanently banned, however I fail to see the relevance of citing a popularity poll… unless we are going to ban other posters who aren't popular?

That's not how it works surely?



Nope it doesn't work that way. The poll was secondary. The decision would have been the same, poll or no poll. The poll did though, clarify what a clear majority of posters want. Good that the mods decision and what the majority want are the same.
User avatar
st.byron
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 7496
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: Netanya

Re: Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby st.byron » Fri 19 May 2017 6:08pm

Dave McNamara wrote:http://www.saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=92665&p=1671277#p1671271

Jackstevo can't be Pluggsy. This is getting all cereal.


Clear evidence Dave. Beyond reasonable doubt. End of story.
User avatar
st.byron
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 7496
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: Netanya

Re: Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby Dave McNamara » Fri 19 May 2017 6:11pm

st.byron wrote:
Dave McNamara wrote:http://www.saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=92665&p=1671277#p1671271

Jackstevo can't be Pluggsy. This is getting all cereal.


Clear evidence Dave. Beyond reasonable doubt. End of story.

Wow!

The garden maintenance industry must be really picking up. Pluggsy can now afford to hire a ghostwriter. :lol:
It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hArSps&feature=player_detailpage

Matt Finnis CEO wrote:"St Kilda is an iconic part of Melbourne which has an identifiable attitude and spirit that is really aligned with where we want to take the club. It is grounded but it is aspirational, it is eclectic, everyone belongs, and we say how do we capture that as an identity? It would be a good move on so many levels for the club."
User avatar
Dave McNamara
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 5062
Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!

Re: Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby dals_da_bomb » Fri 19 May 2017 6:23pm

Talking as a member of the community, and not as a mod - I think the relevance of the poll is important - not in a decision making process officially but in understanding what the forum wants.
Effectively you have a team- a very very small portion of the page having to make decisions that effect the page by interpretation of the rules.
It seems fair to take all available information in to account.
Fairs important given its a forum based solely on those that add to it. Feedback from those people in that case is paramount.

In terms of changing the outcome.
Impossible basically. The rules stipulate what they do.
SO no its not how it works.

Look thats just my personal opinion.
I think your feedback is great. Its certainly worth noting and talking over.
The Tiger and the Lion may be more powerful, but the Wolf does not perform in the circus.
User avatar
dals_da_bomb
Club Player
 
Posts: 645
Joined: Sun 03 Aug 2008 7:49pm

Re: Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby dragit » Fri 19 May 2017 6:24pm

st.byron wrote:
dragit wrote:
st.byron wrote:The mods also take note of a poll posted on the forum in February 2017 under the heading, "Should Plugger66 be re-instated?" From a total of 94 responses, 63% of forum members voted "no".

Fair enough that you would re-ban a poster who is meant to be permanently banned, however I fail to see the relevance of citing a popularity poll… unless we are going to ban other posters who aren't popular?

That's not how it works surely?



Nope it doesn't work that way. The poll was secondary. The decision would have been the same, poll or no poll. The poll did though, clarify what a clear majority of posters want. Good that the mods decision and what the majority want are the same.

From memory another poll suggested that 70% of posters would rather Saynta/Stinger be permanently removed as opposed to pluggs though… so should we run the forum on what the majority of posters want or just by the rules?

There would be heaps of posters who would fail the popularity poll test… no doubt me included.

I understand the ban, but think the poll reference is probably in poor taste. Popularity doesn't decide who is allowed to post here.
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 11497
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am

Re: Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby The Fireman » Fri 19 May 2017 6:28pm

well done..we have enough s*** stirrers on here as it is....don't let that dick head back.....and Plugger if you are reading this , which I'm sure you are , I said dick head.
User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 6193
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm

Re: Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby Proph3t of egan » Fri 19 May 2017 6:32pm

Wasn't around back then, what's the big whoop about plugger66?
Proph3t of egan
Club Player
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Sun 08 May 2016 8:02pm

Re: Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby The Fireman » Fri 19 May 2017 6:36pm

Proph3t of egan wrote:Wasn't around back then, what's the big whoop about plugger66?

antagonist , would cause fights on here on a regular basis...would correct posters on just about everything..you say white he would go black...had the mods pulling their hair out .. a sigh of relief from most when he was shown the door.
Last edited by The Fireman on Fri 19 May 2017 6:45pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 6193
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm

Re: Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby Joe Bloggs » Fri 19 May 2017 6:38pm

Mods may have hung an innocent man.
Joe Bloggs
Club Player
 
Posts: 225
Joined: Sat 13 Dec 2014 3:06pm

Re: Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby st.byron » Fri 19 May 2017 6:43pm

dragit wrote:
st.byron wrote:
dragit wrote:
st.byron wrote:The mods also take note of a poll posted on the forum in February 2017 under the heading, "Should Plugger66 be re-instated?" From a total of 94 responses, 63% of forum members voted "no".

Fair enough that you would re-ban a poster who is meant to be permanently banned, however I fail to see the relevance of citing a popularity poll… unless we are going to ban other posters who aren't popular?

That's not how it works surely?



Nope it doesn't work that way. The poll was secondary. The decision would have been the same, poll or no poll. The poll did though, clarify what a clear majority of posters want. Good that the mods decision and what the majority want are the same.

From memory another poll suggested that 70% of posters would rather Saynta/Stinger be permanently removed as opposed to pluggs though… so should we run the forum on what the majority of posters want or just by the rules?

There would be heaps of posters who would fail the popularity poll test… no doubt me included.

I understand the ban, but think the poll reference is probably in poor taste. Popularity doesn't decide who is allowed to post here.


Dragit, to re-iterate - the poll was secondary. The decision would have been the same, poll or no poll. That the decision reflects the wishes of the majority is a good thing, nothing more.
User avatar
st.byron
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 7496
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: Netanya

Re: Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby st.byron » Fri 19 May 2017 6:43pm

Joe Bloggs wrote:Mods may have hung an innocent man.


On what basis?
User avatar
st.byron
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 7496
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: Netanya

Re: Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby asiu » Fri 19 May 2017 6:55pm

i also agree
... citing that Poll isn't fair


i wouldnt have voted in it
others wouldnt have voted in it
coz we ALL know , its of no point.

its gossip fodder for the likes of SP and his bitches
(traducement SS style basically)



but regardless ... RIP Plugger , Lenny and stevo.
Thanx for the laughs

best get shiftier than a canetoad if u wanna play again on these boards dude ... lol

if you are reading this Pluggs
(which we all know u are)

I still love ya.



fwtw.
Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
asiu
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 4752
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm

Re: Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby WellardSaint » Fri 19 May 2017 7:29pm

Proph3t of egan wrote:Wasn't around back then, what's the big whoop about plugger66?


plugger66 would argue with a signpost :shock: :evil:
he stuck his nose in and argued just to get a rise out of folks.
He used very few words and his tone was one of "oh, you are so stupid"
he was totally obnoxious.
User avatar
WellardSaint
SS Life Member
 
Posts: 2657
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: EUROPA- the smallest of the four Galilean moons orbiting Jupiter

Re: Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby asiu » Fri 19 May 2017 7:36pm

likes a drink
Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
asiu
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 4752
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm

Re: Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby Proph3t of egan » Fri 19 May 2017 7:37pm

WellardSaint wrote:
Proph3t of egan wrote:Wasn't around back then, what's the big whoop about plugger66?


plugger66 would argue with a signpost :shock: :evil:
he stuck his nose in and argued just to get a rise out of folks.
He used very few words and his tone was one of "oh, you are so stupid"
he was totally obnoxious.

Sounds like a peace of work, glad I wasn't around back the I guess
Proph3t of egan
Club Player
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Sun 08 May 2016 8:02pm

Re: Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby saynta » Fri 19 May 2017 8:10pm

dragit wrote:
st.byron wrote:
dragit wrote:
st.byron wrote:The mods also take note of a poll posted on the forum in February 2017 under the heading, "Should Plugger66 be re-instated?" From a total of 94 responses, 63% of forum members voted "no".

Fair enough that you would re-ban a poster who is meant to be permanently banned, however I fail to see the relevance of citing a popularity poll… unless we are going to ban other posters who aren't popular?

That's not how it works surely?



Nope it doesn't work that way. The poll was secondary. The decision would have been the same, poll or no poll. The poll did though, clarify what a clear majority of posters want. Good that the mods decision and what the majority want are the same.

From memory another poll suggested that 70% of posters would rather Saynta/Stinger be permanently removed as opposed to pluggs though… so should we run the forum on what the majority of posters want or just by the rules?

There would be heaps of posters who would fail the popularity poll test… no doubt me included.

I understand the ban, but think the poll reference is probably in poor taste. Popularity doesn't decide who is allowed to post here.


Not the first time you have mentioned a poll calling for a poster to be banned.
I would think that is a clear breach of the rules.

"Do not start threads or make posts requesting the discipline of other members, nor PM the Moderators requesting discipline or punishment. Use the REPORT FUNCTION (!) instead. You are entitled to report behaviour you believe breaches the rules, but it will be at the Moderator discretion as to the punishment required. Where possible, your report will be acknowledged and/or decisions will be explained to you."


Starting a poll, if in fact you started such a poll, trying to get a poster banned is in my view contrary to the intentions of those who make up and enforce the rules.

I am sick and tired of you mentioning me in connection with such issues every time that banned cockhead is mentioned.

Keep it up and I will report such posts.

For the record no such poll ever mentioned saynta ffs.
Last edited by saynta on Sat 20 May 2017 11:57am, edited 1 time in total.
saynta
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 4244
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm

Re: Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby asiu » Fri 19 May 2017 8:30pm

liked calling out pomposity outlandishness silliness and cleaners

loves the underdog 'n the newbies
... i heard he happily and cheerfully shared ozzy kulture with 4 folded up beer garden unbrellas one night
for an hour after a little drinky.

He was alright.
... dont listen to the sooks Poe
Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
asiu
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 4752
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm

Re: Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby The Fireman » Fri 19 May 2017 8:33pm

asiu wrote:liked calling out pomposity outlandishness silliness and cleaners

loves the underdog 'n the newbies
... i heard he happily and cheerfully shared ozzy kulture with 4 folded up beer garden unbrellas one night
for an hour after a little drinky.

He was alright.
... dont listen to the sooks Poe

you maybe his only supporter...I know you dont mind swimming against the tide..but the majority was happy he was outed. :)
User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 6193
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm

Re: Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby dragit » Fri 19 May 2017 8:34pm

st.byron wrote:Dragit, to re-iterate - the poll was secondary. The decision would have been the same, poll or no poll. That the decision reflects the wishes of the majority is a good thing, nothing more.

So I guess if the poll had been 100% in pluggers favour but he still couldn't post, then it is completely irrelevant.

Like asiu, I didn't vote in the poll, just like I won't get behind a fresh Harold Holt campaign.

I think some people might see the poll reference as an attempt to justify what was a controversial ban in the first place… I think it is well accepted that the culpable offensive messages sent to a mod were in fact not sent by plugger… but others using his device, so there is still some considerable conjecture regarding the merit of his original ban.

Now the moderators are referencing a poll that was allowed to stay on the main board for over a week when any other similar polls are removed hastily… it doesn't really pass the smell test TBH.
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 11497
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am

Re: Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby The Fireman » Fri 19 May 2017 8:43pm

If it was a dodgy legal process that incarcerated Julian Knight...I could live with that.

(please excuse over the top analogy )
User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 6193
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm

Re: Lennyhaze, Jackstevo permanent bans

Postby Sainternist » Fri 19 May 2017 8:49pm

Sounds like poor old P66 has really missed this place.
The Saints are looking prettay...prettay...prettay...PRETTY GOOD!
User avatar
Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
 
Posts: 8478
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven

Next

Return to Saintsational Fan Forum (open to all ages)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 8856brother, barneyboyz, Bing [Bot], borderbarry, carn_sainter, Google [Bot], Linton Lodger, longtimesaint, one point, peter van ravenstein, PremiershipSaint, realdeal, remboy, SaintAndrew, shrodes and 31 guests