JLT3: Saints v Swans Replay Link for your viewing pleasure

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30034
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 700 times
Been thanked: 1212 times

JLT3: Saints v Swans Replay Link for your viewing pleasure

Post: # 1653811Post saintsRrising »



Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7641
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 187 times
Been thanked: 528 times

Re: JLT3: Saints v Swans Replay Link for your viewing pleasu

Post: # 1653988Post magnifisaint »

About time McCartin started getting selfish and kick some goals. He wasn't recruited as a midfielder.


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
mr six o'clock
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4233
Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006 1:05am
Has thanked: 42 times
Been thanked: 227 times

Re: JLT3: Saints v Swans Replay Link for your viewing pleasu

Post: # 1653998Post mr six o'clock »

Thanks for posting !

We kicked a goal from a 50 metre penalty in the third quarter , the commentators said " this will be for nine points " .
We were only paid six .
Three points would have drawn the game .
Does anyone know why a nine pointer wasn't paid ? or did I miss the explanation in the coverage .


In red white and black from 73
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7641
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 187 times
Been thanked: 528 times

Re: JLT3: Saints v Swans Replay Link for your viewing pleasu

Post: # 1654008Post magnifisaint »

mr six o'clock wrote:Thanks for posting !

We kicked a goal from a 50 metre penalty in the third quarter , the commentators said " this will be for nine points " .
We were only paid six .
Three points would have drawn the game .
Does anyone know why a nine pointer wasn't paid ? or did I miss the explanation in the coverage .
f*** the 9 pointer. It's the biggest dud trial rule introduced


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30034
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 700 times
Been thanked: 1212 times

Re: JLT3: Saints v Swans Replay Link for your viewing pleasu

Post: # 1654009Post saintsRrising »

mr six o'clock wrote:Thanks for posting !

We kicked a goal from a 50 metre penalty in the third quarter , the commentators said " this will be for nine points " .
We were only paid six .
Three points would have drawn the game .
Does anyone know why a nine pointer wasn't paid ? or did I miss the explanation in the coverage .
The umpire offered our player the ability to kick for 9 points. To achieve this the player still had to kick from outside the 50m arc. He opted to take the more certain closer shot on goal.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7641
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 187 times
Been thanked: 528 times

Re: JLT3: Saints v Swans Replay Link for your viewing pleasu

Post: # 1654011Post magnifisaint »

saintsRrising wrote:
mr six o'clock wrote:Thanks for posting !

We kicked a goal from a 50 metre penalty in the third quarter , the commentators said " this will be for nine points " .
We were only paid six .
Three points would have drawn the game .
Does anyone know why a nine pointer wasn't paid ? or did I miss the explanation in the coverage .
The umpire offered our player the ability to kick for 9 points. To achieve this the player still had to kick from outside the 50m arc. He opted to take the more certain closer shot on goal.
In previous years that counted as a 9 pointer.


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
User avatar
shrodes
SS Life Member
Posts: 2594
Joined: Tue 12 Aug 2014 2:34pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 662 times
Been thanked: 326 times

Re: JLT3: Saints v Swans Replay Link for your viewing pleasu

Post: # 1654026Post shrodes »

magnifisaint wrote:
saintsRrising wrote:
mr six o'clock wrote:Thanks for posting !

We kicked a goal from a 50 metre penalty in the third quarter , the commentators said " this will be for nine points " .
We were only paid six .
Three points would have drawn the game .
Does anyone know why a nine pointer wasn't paid ? or did I miss the explanation in the coverage .
The umpire offered our player the ability to kick for 9 points. To achieve this the player still had to kick from outside the 50m arc. He opted to take the more certain closer shot on goal.
In previous years that counted as a 9 pointer.
Could be wrong, but I believe it was changed at least a year or two ago. I thought they talked about it on the commentary, saying the coach wouldn't be happy if they elected to try for 9 when they could take the easier 6.


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30034
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 700 times
Been thanked: 1212 times

Re: JLT3: Saints v Swans Replay Link for your viewing pleasu

Post: # 1654028Post saintsRrising »

magnifisaint wrote:
saintsRrising wrote:
mr six o'clock wrote:Thanks for posting !

We kicked a goal from a 50 metre penalty in the third quarter , the commentators said " this will be for nine points " .
We were only paid six .
Three points would have drawn the game .
Does anyone know why a nine pointer wasn't paid ? or did I miss the explanation in the coverage .
The umpire offered our player the ability to kick for 9 points. To achieve this the player still had to kick from outside the 50m arc. He opted to take the more certain closer shot on goal.
In previous years that counted as a 9 pointer.
Not since 2010. Rule was amended for 2011 NAB Cup on.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
mr six o'clock
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4233
Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006 1:05am
Has thanked: 42 times
Been thanked: 227 times

Re: JLT3: Saints v Swans Replay Link for your viewing pleasu

Post: # 1654033Post mr six o'clock »

saintsRrising wrote:
magnifisaint wrote:
saintsRrising wrote:
mr six o'clock wrote:Thanks for posting !

We kicked a goal from a 50 metre penalty in the third quarter , the commentators said " this will be for nine points " .
We were only paid six .
Three points would have drawn the game .
Does anyone know why a nine pointer wasn't paid ? or did I miss the explanation in the coverage .
The umpire offered our player the ability to kick for 9 points. To achieve this the player still had to kick from outside the 50m arc. He opted to take the more certain closer shot on goal.
In previous years that counted as a 9 pointer.
Not since 2010. Rule was amended for 2011 NAB Cup on.
Thanks for explanation
Makes you wonder why they still have the supergoal , when teams are playing for no reward .


In red white and black from 73
Post Reply