NATHAN BURKE IS on the footy show tonight!

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
Buckets
SS Life Member
Posts: 2501
Joined: Wed 25 Aug 2004 5:35pm
Location: Wodonga

Post: # 455773Post Buckets »

chook23 wrote:
Buckets wrote:
chook23 wrote:If RB had have answered some of the questions the way Burkie did

he would be ridiculed.....

Perception

Difference one considered past use by date

the other a fresh approach and a club legend to boot

No matter how RB answers is damaged goods in most eyes

Must admit burkie only just ok BUT first time probably under the grill in that enviroment
Actually there is a big difference -
1. RB did an exclusive interview for TFS with only Hutchy asking leading questions and allowing him to waffle on in the only way that RB can, business rhetoric
2. Burkie came on live and faced not only Hutchy but Gary Lyon and his patsies and tried to make a fool out of a club legend. As AOK said in another thread Burkie's first reply to Hutchy in reference to allowing the AFL to give the tick of approval for the challengers would have won a lot of people over. Kudos for having the balls to go on to the show to face that firing squad.
my comparisons or view was not based only on the interviews tonight but RB over a period of time......

Burkies was based on the interview
Fair enough, RB to me just seems to hide behind interviews like the one tonight or comes out with prepared statements with business rhetoric, simple straight forward responses would impress me. The fact that he wants the independent AFL to look at the challengers proposal lost me. As Burkie said when did the AFL represent the members of the St. Kilda Football Club.


Thats Mr. Smartarse to you
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22622
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 696 times
Been thanked: 1640 times

Post: # 455777Post Teflon »

Buckets wrote:
chook23 wrote:
Buckets wrote:
chook23 wrote:If RB had have answered some of the questions the way Burkie did

he would be ridiculed.....

Perception

Difference one considered past use by date

the other a fresh approach and a club legend to boot

No matter how RB answers is damaged goods in most eyes

Must admit burkie only just ok BUT first time probably under the grill in that enviroment
Actually there is a big difference -
1. RB did an exclusive interview for TFS with only Hutchy asking leading questions and allowing him to waffle on in the only way that RB can, business rhetoric
2. Burkie came on live and faced not only Hutchy but Gary Lyon and his patsies and tried to make a fool out of a club legend. As AOK said in another thread Burkie's first reply to Hutchy in reference to allowing the AFL to give the tick of approval for the challengers would have won a lot of people over. Kudos for having the balls to go on to the show to face that firing squad.
my comparisons or view was not based only on the interviews tonight but RB over a period of time......

Burkies was based on the interview
Fair enough, RB to me just seems to hide behind interviews like the one tonight or comes out with prepared statements with business rhetoric, simple straight forward responses would impress me. The fact that he wants the independent AFL to look at the challengers proposal lost me. As Burkie said when did the AFL represent the members of the St. Kilda Football Club.
If Rod Butters is "hiding" where was our Presidnet elect Greg Westaway tonight?>

Id suggest hiding behind Burkie.......


“Yeah….nah””
aussierules0k
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6440
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 11:13pm

Post: # 455784Post aussierules0k »

Last edited by aussierules0k on Tue 23 Jun 2009 5:53am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Buckets
SS Life Member
Posts: 2501
Joined: Wed 25 Aug 2004 5:35pm
Location: Wodonga

Post: # 455786Post Buckets »

Teflon wrote:
Buckets wrote:
chook23 wrote:
Buckets wrote:
chook23 wrote:If RB had have answered some of the questions the way Burkie did

he would be ridiculed.....

Perception

Difference one considered past use by date

the other a fresh approach and a club legend to boot

No matter how RB answers is damaged goods in most eyes

Must admit burkie only just ok BUT first time probably under the grill in that enviroment
Actually there is a big difference -
1. RB did an exclusive interview for TFS with only Hutchy asking leading questions and allowing him to waffle on in the only way that RB can, business rhetoric
2. Burkie came on live and faced not only Hutchy but Gary Lyon and his patsies and tried to make a fool out of a club legend. As AOK said in another thread Burkie's first reply to Hutchy in reference to allowing the AFL to give the tick of approval for the challengers would have won a lot of people over. Kudos for having the balls to go on to the show to face that firing squad.
my comparisons or view was not based only on the interviews tonight but RB over a period of time......

Burkies was based on the interview
Fair enough, RB to me just seems to hide behind interviews like the one tonight or comes out with prepared statements with business rhetoric, simple straight forward responses would impress me. The fact that he wants the independent AFL to look at the challengers proposal lost me. As Burkie said when did the AFL represent the members of the St. Kilda Football Club.
If Rod Butters is "hiding" where was our Presidnet elect Greg Westaway tonight?>

Id suggest hiding behind Burkie.......
Thing is Teflon the SFF members are showing more courage fronting up to shows like TFS and copping the heat from a media scrum that all of a sudden have fallen deeply in love with RB and the board. Yet all we have from RB is a conference today where he skirted around issues and then had a one on one with his buddy Hutchy.


Thats Mr. Smartarse to you
chook23
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7225
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:31am
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 134 times

Post: # 455788Post chook23 »

aussierules0k wrote:As a member, I'd much preferred to hear from a past legend as the problems of our club than some guy I've never heard of.

SFF made a good decision on behalf of us...the members.
Admire burkie as much as anyone but I do think Westaway should have
been the front man tonight............but good use of a legend by SFF


saint4life
aussierules0k
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6440
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 11:13pm

Post: # 455790Post aussierules0k »

Last edited by aussierules0k on Tue 23 Jun 2009 5:53am, edited 1 time in total.


HarveysDeciple

Post: # 455794Post HarveysDeciple »

What annoyed me was the difference in interviews..

Hutchy interviews Rod and asks easy soft questions and even implies that the challenge was rude and stupid.

He interviews Burke, questions his integrity and subtly slams the challenge.

Ridiculous.


User avatar
saint patrick
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4338
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 5:20pm
Location: mt.martha

Post: # 455804Post saint patrick »

HarveysDeciple wrote:What annoyed me was the difference in interviews..

Hutchy interviews Rod and asks easy soft questions and even implies that the challenge was rude and stupid.

He interviews Burke, questions his integrity and subtly slams the challenge.

Ridiculous.
Exactly HD ...and the fact that Rod thinks the AFL not the members should decide who is on the board at St.Kilda...

that broke the back for me... :evil:

Bring on the vote and banish the whole GT,Butterss Sorry bitter Sage to the bin and move forward as a united force :roll:


Never take a backward step even to gain momentum.....

'It's OK to have the capabilities and abilities, but you've got to get it done." Terry Daniher 05

"We have beauty in our captain and we have a true leader in our coach. Our time will come"
Thinline.Post 09 Grand final.
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22622
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 696 times
Been thanked: 1640 times

Post: # 455835Post Teflon »

Westaway WANTS to President - he shouldve fronted and stopped trying to manouvre the popular Burke into the spotlight while sparing himself the tough questions.

He made the drug comments - NOT Burkie - he shouldve fronted to answer the questions.


“Yeah….nah””
bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18393
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1728 times
Been thanked: 801 times

Post: # 455838Post bigcarl »

saint patrick wrote:Bring on the vote and banish the whole GT, Butterss sorry bitter saga to the bin and move forward as a united force
agree. only way forward to the club, unfortunately, on reflection. thanks for your contribution rod


User avatar
Apu
Club Player
Posts: 149
Joined: Tue 26 Jun 2007 6:05pm
Location: Caroline Springs

Post: # 455879Post Apu »

HarveysDeciple wrote:What annoyed me was the difference in interviews..

Hutchy interviews Rod and asks easy soft questions and even implies that the challenge was rude and stupid.

He interviews Burke, questions his integrity and subtly slams the challenge.

Ridiculous.
My thoughts exactly!!! absolutely disgraceful journalism in the way he treated the two interviews differently


_________________
Silly customer, you cannot hurt a twinkie
Post Reply