Just a question regarding the challengers

[Dan Warna]

was it fair to ask for the proxi vote prior to the incumbants getting the right of reply?

is this a bit of an ambush?

this i'm raising as a seperate debating issue from the general approach by FFS, but before they deliver their plans and strategy, the are asking us to trust them on the value of the CV, and the failings of the previous board.

[crowjelly]

To me it looks a lot like an ambush! SFF need to present the members with a 5 year business plan, as does the current board and then let the members decide.

Otherwise they'll need to book the dome so we can all attend and vote at the EGM.

Priorities have to be conditioning/injury management, sponsorship, player facilities, recruiting and revenue generation.

Let us hope the football operations are not distracted in the interim.

On another note, on what basis were members' names and addresses made available to SFF?

[Armoooo]

On another note, on what basis were members' names and addresses made available to SFF?

I was wondering that also...

[riccardo]

They are asking the members for a proxy, so its a choice. You can say yes or no, no right of reply is required.

[chook23]

Dan

Have similar queries

Whilst their right so many have made a decision based without theses facts.

[Dan Warna]

Dan

Have similar queries

Whilst their right so many have made a decision based without theses facts.

Not entirely without fact.

there seems to be a lot of circumstantial evidence that Fraser isn't performing well.

there is a lot of practical evidence that RB has let personal issues get in the way of decision making.

[saintsRrising]

is this a bit of an ambush?

.

While I have now decided to vote FF....I am very uneasy about Gdanski.....and yes would tend to believe that he has beena chief instigator and ambusher...including engineering that he stays despite his clear failings in the Elite Sports Cente issue.